Literature DB >> 32378975

Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on skeletal muscle size and function in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Michael J Toth1,2,3,4, Thomas B Voigt1, Timothy W Tourville3,5, Shannon M Prior4, Blas A Guigni1,2, Axel V Schlosberg1, Isaac B Smith1, Taylor J Forest1, Peter A Kaufman1,4, Marie E Wood1,4, Hibba Rehman1,4, Kim Dittus1,4.   

Abstract

Exercise has numerous benefits for patients with cancer, but implementation is challenging because of practical and logistical hurdles. This study examined whether neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can serve as a surrogate for classic exercise by eliciting an exercise training response in skeletal muscle of women diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Patients (n = 22) with histologically confirmed stage I, II, or III breast cancer scheduled to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to 8 wk of bilateral neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES; 5 days/wk) to their quadriceps muscles or control. Biopsy of the vastus lateralis was performed at baseline and after 8 wk of intervention to assess muscle fiber size, contractility, and mitochondrial content. Seventeen patients (8 control/9 NMES) completed the trial and were included in analyses. NMES promoted muscle fiber hypertrophy (P < 0.001), particularly in fast-twitch, myosin heavy chain (MHC) IIA fibers (P < 0.05) and tended to induce fiber type shifts in MHC II fibers. The effects of NMES on single-muscle fiber contractility were modest, and it was unable to prevent declines in the function in MHC IIA fibers. NMES did not alter intermyofibrillar mitochondrial content/structure but was associated with reductions in subsarcolemmal mitochondria. Our results demonstrate that NMES induces muscle fiber hypertrophy and fiber type shifts in MHC II fibers but had minimal effects on fiber contractility and promoted reductions in subsarcolemmal mitochondria. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the utility of NMES as an exercise surrogate in cancer patients and other conditions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to evaluate whether neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be used as an exercise surrogate to improve skeletal muscle fiber size or function in cancer patients receiving treatment. We show that NMES promoted muscle fiber hypertrophy and fiber type shifts but had minimal effects on single-fiber contractility and reduced subsarcolemmal mitochondria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise; hypertrophy; muscle contraction

Year:  2020        PMID: 32378975      PMCID: PMC7311687          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00203.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  79 in total

1.  Mechanisms underlying the training effects associated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  M H Trimble; R M Enoka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1991-04

2.  Morphology, metabolism, microcirculation, and strength of skeletal muscles in cancer-related cachexia.

Authors:  Marc-André Weber; Holger Krakowski-Roosen; Leif Schröder; Ralf Kinscherf; Martin Krix; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Marco Essig; Peter Bachert; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Wulf Hildebrandt
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 3.  Neural control of phenotypic expression in mammalian muscle fibers.

Authors:  D Pette; G Vrbová
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training induces atypical adaptations of the human skeletal muscle phenotype: a functional and proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Lorenza Brocca; Elena Bellinzona; Giuseppe D'Antona; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Danilo Miotti; Maria A Pellegrino; Roberto Bottinelli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-12-02

5.  Skeletal muscle fiber size and fiber type distribution in human cancer: Effects of weight loss and relationship to physical function.

Authors:  Michael J Toth; Damien M Callahan; Mark S Miller; Timothy W Tourville; Sarah B Hackett; Marion E Couch; Kim Dittus
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  In vivo microscopy reveals extensive embedding of capillaries within the sarcolemma of skeletal muscle fibers.

Authors:  Brian Glancy; Li-Yueh Hsu; Lam Dao; Matthew Bakalar; Stephanie French; David J Chess; Joni L Taylor; Martin Picard; Angel Aponte; Mathew P Daniels; Shervin Esfahani; Samuel Cushman; Robert S Balaban
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Altered expression of skeletal muscle myosin isoforms in cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Gary M Diffee; Katherine Kalfas; Sadeeka Al-Majid; Donna O McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.249

8.  Development of Exercise as Interception Therapy for Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Neil M Iyengar; Lee W Jones
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 9.  Weight management and physical activity throughout the cancer care continuum.

Authors:  Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Kathryn H Schmitz; Catherine M Alfano; Jennifer R Bail; Pamela J Goodwin; Cynthia A Thomson; Don W Bradley; Kerry S Courneya; Christie A Befort; Crystal S Denlinger; Jennifer A Ligibel; William H Dietz; Melinda R Stolley; Melinda L Irwin; Marcas M Bamman; Caroline M Apovian; Bernardine M Pinto; Kathleen Y Wolin; Rachel M Ballard; Andrew J Dannenberg; Elizabeth G Eakin; Matt M Longjohn; Susan D Raffa; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Joanne S Buzaglo; Sharyl J Nass; Greta M Massetti; Erin P Balogh; Elizabeth S Kraft; Anand K Parekh; Darshak M Sanghavi; G Stephen Morris; Karen Basen-Engquist
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Skeletal muscle atrophy and dysfunction in breast cancer patients: role for chemotherapy-derived oxidant stress.

Authors:  Blas A Guigni; Damien M Callahan; Timothy W Tourville; Mark S Miller; Brad Fiske; Thomas Voigt; Bethany Korwin-Mihavics; Vikas Anathy; Kim Dittus; Michael J Toth
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.249

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of total knee arthroplasty on skeletal muscle structure and function at the cellular, organellar, and molecular levels.

Authors:  Michael J Toth; Patrick D Savage; Thomas B Voigt; Bradley M Anair; Janice Y Bunn; Isaac B Smith; Timothy W Tourville; Michael Blankstein; Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley; Nathaniel J Nelms
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 2.  Muscular contraction's therapeutic potential for cancer-induced wasting.

Authors:  Justin P Hardee; James A Carson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.282

Review 3.  The Impact of Immune Cells on the Skeletal Muscle Microenvironment During Cancer Cachexia.

Authors:  Brandon N VanderVeen; E Angela Murphy; James A Carson
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  The Acute Effects of 5 Fluorouracil on Skeletal Muscle Resident and Infiltrating Immune Cells in Mice.

Authors:  Brandon N VanderVeen; Alexander T Sougiannis; Kandy T Velazquez; James A Carson; Daping Fan; E Angela Murphy
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Effects of Various Muscle Disuse States and Countermeasures on Muscle Molecular Signaling.

Authors:  Kristina Sharlo; Sergey A Tyganov; Elena Tomilovskaya; Daniil V Popov; Alina A Saveko; Boris S Shenkman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.