Manami Kawai1, Toshiaki Goseki2, Hitoshi Ishikawa1, Sonoko Tatsui1, Nobuyuki Shoji1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan. gosekikun@aol.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the importance and efficacy of the standard coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis method for the correct clinical diagnosis of the sagging eye syndrome. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the standard coronal MRI efficacy by comparing the positions of the orbital pulleys and extraocular muscles in patients with sagging eye syndrome as well as controls. The participants included 50 patients with sagging eye syndrome (aged 73.3 ± 6.7 years) and 17 age-matched control patients (aged 70.9 ± 4.3 years) that presented optic neuritis. The participants were classified into groups of age-related distance esotropia and cyclo-vertical strabismus. Lateral rectus-superior rectus band condition, lateral rectus vertical angle, lateral rectus tilting angle, and superior rectus-lateral rectus displacement angle were examined. RESULTS: The lateral rectus-superior rectus band was more frequently disordered in the two groups than that in the control. The lateral rectus vertical and tilt angle examinations exhibited a significant difference in the age-related distance esotropia [(- 13.3 ± 10.9°, p < 0.05) and (- 24.1 ± 9.5°, p < 0.01)] and cyclo-vertical strabismus [(- 11.9 ± 6.9°, p < 0.05) and (- 20.8 ± 9.3°, p < 0.01)] groups compared with those in the control group [(- 7.5 ± 5.1°) and (- 12.2 ± 9.1°)]. The superior rectus-lateral rectus displacement angle did not present a significant difference between the patients and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sagging eye syndrome exhibited disordered orbital pulley and extraocular muscle malposition, as determined by standard coronal magnetic resonance imaging, indicating the effectiveness of the procedure for diagnosing sagging eye syndrome.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the importance and efficacy of the standard coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis method for the correct clinical diagnosis of the sagging eye syndrome. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the standard coronal MRI efficacy by comparing the positions of the orbital pulleys and extraocular muscles in patients with sagging eye syndrome as well as controls. The participants included 50 patients with sagging eye syndrome (aged 73.3 ± 6.7 years) and 17 age-matched control patients (aged 70.9 ± 4.3 years) that presented optic neuritis. The participants were classified into groups of age-related distance esotropia and cyclo-vertical strabismus. Lateral rectus-superior rectus band condition, lateral rectus vertical angle, lateral rectus tilting angle, and superior rectus-lateral rectus displacement angle were examined. RESULTS: The lateral rectus-superior rectus band was more frequently disordered in the two groups than that in the control. The lateral rectus vertical and tilt angle examinations exhibited a significant difference in the age-related distance esotropia [(- 13.3 ± 10.9°, p < 0.05) and (- 24.1 ± 9.5°, p < 0.01)] and cyclo-vertical strabismus [(- 11.9 ± 6.9°, p < 0.05) and (- 20.8 ± 9.3°, p < 0.01)] groups compared with those in the control group [(- 7.5 ± 5.1°) and (- 12.2 ± 9.1°)]. The superior rectus-lateral rectus displacement angle did not present a significant difference between the patients and control groups. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with sagging eye syndrome exhibited disordered orbital pulley and extraocular muscle malposition, as determined by standard coronal magnetic resonance imaging, indicating the effectiveness of the procedure for diagnosing sagging eye syndrome.
Entities:
Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging; Orbit; Sagging eye syndrome; Strabismus
Authors: Toshiaki Goseki; Soh Youn Suh; Laura Robbins; Stacy L Pineles; Federico G Velez; Joseph L Demer Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-09-14 Impact factor: 5.258