| Literature DB >> 32377766 |
Marine Goudelin1,2, Pauline Champy1, Jean-Bernard Amiel1, Bruno Evrard1,2, Anne-Laure Fedou1,2, Thomas Daix1,2, Bruno François1,2, Philippe Vignon3,4,5,6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the role of left ventricular overload and cumulated fluid balance in the development weaning-induced pulmonary edema (WIPO).Entities:
Keywords: Echocardiography; Echocardiography Doppler; Pulmonary edema; Ventilator weaning; Water-electrolyte balance
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32377766 PMCID: PMC7223421 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06061-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med ISSN: 0342-4642 Impact factor: 17.440
Fig. 1Study flow chart. Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; SBT, spontaneous breathing trial
Patients characteristics at inclusion according to the result of the first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)
| Study population | SBT success | SBT failure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 62 (52–73) | 63 (52–73) | 58 (45–70) | 0.38 |
| Gender, M/F | 39/20 | 29/18 | 10/2 | 0.157 |
| Heart failure with LVEF ≤ 40% (%) | 44 (75) | 35 (74) | 9 (75) | 0.97 |
| COPD (%) | 20 (36) | 16 (34) | 4 (33) | 0.848 |
| Acute pulmonary edema (%) | 13 (22) | 10 (21) | 3 (25) | 0.78 |
| Cardiogenic shock (%) | 7 (12) | 6 (13) | 1 (8) | 0.67 |
| Cardiorespiratory arrest (%) | 7 (12) | 6 (13) | 1 (8) | 0.78 |
| Exacerbation of COPD (%) | 6 (10) | 5 (11) | 1 (8) | 0.81 |
| Post cardiac surgery (%) | 9 (15) | 8 (17) | 1 (8) | 0.76 |
| Other (%) | 17 (29) | 12 (26) | 5 (41) | 0.47 |
| Ischemic cardiomyopathy (%) | 38 (53) | 31 (66) | 7 (58) | 0.95 |
| Dilated cardiomyopathy (%) | 11 (19) | 7 (28) | 4 (33) | 0.09 |
| Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (%) | 6 (10) | 6 (13) | 0 (0) | 0.22 |
| Severe aortic valve disease (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | – |
| Severe pulmonary hypertension (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | – |
| Non severe valve disease (%) | 8 (17) | 6 (13) | 2 (17) | 0.62 |
| Obesity (%) | 13 (22) | 10 (21) | 3 (25) | 0.64 |
| SAPS 2 | 38.5 (30–53) | 39 (30–53) | 35.5 (23.5–51) | 0.46 |
| SOFA | 6 (4–9) | 6 (4–9) | 6 (3–10) | 0.72 |
| ICU mortality (%) | 4 (7) | 2 (4) | 2 (17) | 0.13 |
| Bronchodilators (%) | 9 (15) | 7 (15) | 2 (16) | 0.765 |
| Corticosteroids (%) | 8 (14) | 6 (13) | 2 (16) | 0.62 |
| Furosemide (%) | 25 (42) | 20 (43) | 5 (42) | 0.82 |
| Nitrates (%) | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 0.63 |
| Catecholamines (%) | 17 (29) | 13 (28) | 4 (33) | 0.54 |
| FiO2, % | 30 (30–40) | 30 (30–40) | 30 (30–37.5) | 0.695 |
| Pressure support level, cm H2O | 12 (10–14) | 12 (10–14) | 14 (11–15) | 0.234 |
| PEEP, cmH2O | 7 (4–10) | 6 (4–10) | 9 (7–10) | 0.128 |
| RR, breath/min | 19 (16–24) | 19 (16–22) | 20 (16–20) | 0.884 |
| Duration of mechanical ventilation, h | 110 (60–180) | 96 (54–171) | 127 (86–241) | 0.30 |
| SaO2, % | 98 (96–99) | 100 (96–100) | 97 (96–99) | 0.59 |
| PaO2, mmHg | 142 (81–234) | 99 (85–108) | 86 (85–120) | 0.51 |
| PaO2/FiO2 | 287 (235–351) | 287 (228–353) | 288 (241–340) | 0.91 |
| PaCO2, mmHg | 42 (33–60) | 36 (32–43) | 35 (32–40) | 0.55 |
| Weight difference (admission), kg | − 2.0 (− 4.2/ + 1.2) | − 2.5 (− 4.8/ + 1) | 0.75 (− 2.95/ + 5.6) | 0.02 |
| Fluid balance (admission), ml | − 2150 (− 3505/ + 1282) | − 2326 (− 3715/ + 863) | 146 (− 2654/ + 4434) | 0.047 |
Results are expressed as medians (with 25th and 75th percentiles in parentheses), or as numbers (percentages in parentheses)
COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SAPS Simplified Acute Physiology score, SOFA sepsis-related organ failure assessment, ICU intensive care unit, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, RR respiratory rate
Hemodynamic parameters and echocardiographic findings obtained immediately before and during the first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)
| General population | SBT success | SBT failure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamic parameters | ||||
| HR, bpm | 94 (82–108) | 90 (80–103) | 96 (86–113) | 0.13 |
| sBP, mmHg | 138 (130–151) | 142 (130–153) | 131 (108–138) | 0.08 |
| dBP, mmHg | 79 (71–87)* | 78 (71–87) | 81 (69–88) | 0.65 |
| mBP, mmHg | 97 (87–107)* | 98 (88–107)* | 92 (82–110) | 0.61 |
| Echocardiography findings | ||||
| 85 (61–100)* | 83 (62–91) | 101 (84–144) | 0.046 | |
| 85 (62–109) | 86 (23–172) | 58 (37–101) | 0.025 | |
| 0.9 (0.8–1.4)* | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | 1.7 (1.3–2.4) | 0.001 | |
| DTE, ms | 147 (109–206)* | 173 (128–213) | 107 (94–129) | 0.002 |
| | 9.9 (7.5–12.6) | 9.9 (7.5–12.4) | 9.8 (7–15.3) | 0.66 |
| | 8.4 (5.7–11.3)* | 9.1 (5.6–11) | 9.2 (6.6–12.5) | 0.32 |
| MR/LA area | 0.18 (0.14–0.23) | 0.2 (0.16–0.24) | 0.15 (0.13–0.31) | 0.87 |
| LVEF, % | 35 (24–40) | 35 (26–40) | 24 (18–36) | 0.083 |
| LVOT VTI, cm | 16.1 (12.8–21) | 16.6 (13.4–20.9) | 14.6 (8.5–21.2) | 0.295 |
| TR peak velocity, m/s | 2.96 (2.66–3.38)* | 2.87 (2.53–3.05) | 3.39 (2.86–3.78) | 0.047 |
| Hemodynamic parameters | ||||
| HR, bpm | 102 (91–115) | 96 (86–113) | 131 (113–143) | < 0.0001 |
| sBP, mmHg | 146 (125–158) | 147 (125–157) | 140 (118–168) | 0.8 |
| dBP, mmHg | 80 (70–95)* | 80 (70–93) | 80 (65–98) | 0.98 |
| mBP, mmHg | 104 (90–113)* | 104 (93–113)* | 111 (72–113) | 0.95 |
| Echocardiography findings | ||||
| | 95 (75–115)* | 93 (74–109) | 122 (92–159) | 0.017 |
| | 83 (68–112) | 88 (75–114) | 60 (33–94) | 0.012 |
| | 0.9 (0.8–1.8)* | 0.88 (0.8–1.3) | 2.1 (1.2–3.6) | 0.001 |
| DTE, ms | 128 (89–163)* | 147 (103–175) | 85 (72–125) | 0.004 |
| | 10.6 (8–12.6) | 10 (8.1–12.3) | 11.4 (7–16.1) | 0.26 |
| | 9.5 (7.5–12.7)* | 9.6 (7.2–12.7) | 9.3 (7.8–16) | 0.84 |
| MR/LA area | 0.21 (0.15–0.3) | 0.21 (0.14–0.24) | 0.26 (0.17–0.4) | 0.57 |
| LVEF, % | 32 (22–42) | 33 (24–46) | 23 (13–33) | 0.033 |
| LVOT VTI, cm | 16.8 (12.8–20.7) | 17.5 (14.1–20.8) | 11.5 (7.7–19.2) | 0.088 |
| TR peak velocity, m/s | 3.18 (2.92–3.56)* | 3.01 (2.73–3.3) | 3.67 (3.15–4.15) | 0.12 |
HR heart rate, sBP systolic blood pressure, dBP diastolic blood pressure, mBP mean blood pressure, DTE deceleration time of mitral E wave, MR mitral regurgitation, LA left atrium, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVOT left ventricular outflow tract, VTI velocity–time integral, TR tricuspid regurgitation
*Significant difference between parameters measured under positive pressure ventilation and during the weaning trial
Hemodynamic parameters and echocardiography findings in the subset of patients who failed the first SBT but succeeded the second weaning trial
| 1st failed SBT | 2nd passed SBT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamic parameters | |||
| HR, bpm | 107 (92–126)* | 102 (91–114) | 0.308 |
| sBP, mmHg | 131 (108–142) | 144 (120–160) | 0.475 |
| dBP, mmHg | 82 (68–90) | 82 (77–91) | 0.477 |
| mBP, mmHg | 92 (82–111) | 102 (90–116) | 0.312 |
| Echocardiography parameters | |||
| | 102 (85–149) | 84 (67–127) | 0.017 |
| | 58 (41–110) | 62 (48–93) | 0.88 |
| 1.7 (1.2–2.7) | 1.3 (0.8–2.1) | 0.139 | |
| DTE, ms | 103 (92–134) | 133 (103–184) | 0.139 |
| 11.1 (7.6–16.4) | 13.5 (8.8–15.4) | 0.646 | |
| | 8.9 (5.9–13.1) | 7.3 (5–10.4) | 0.028 |
| MR/LA area | 0.15 (0.14–0.2) | 0.11 (0.06–0.17) | 0.249 |
| LVEF, % | 30 (20–36) | 34 (27–38) | 0.161 |
| LVOT VTI, cm | 14.6 (9.3–22.6) | 15.0 (10.9–19) | 0.678 |
| TR peak velocity, m/s | 3.43 (2.69–4.52) | 3.2 (2.64–3.48) | 0.285 |
| Hemodynamic parameters | |||
| HR, bpm | 131 (112–138) | 108 (99–111) | 0.011 |
| sBP, mmHg | 143 (125–168) | 133 (113–156) | 0.919 |
| dBP, mmHg | 88 (63–99) | 77 (70–78) | 0.308 |
| mBP, mmHg | 112 (72–115) | 94 (85–106) | 0.507 |
| Echocardiography parameters | |||
| | 122 (93–168) | 100 (85–122) | 0.009 |
| | 60 (34–103) | 67 (48–93) | 0.48 |
| 2.5 (1.1–3.6) | 1.5 (0.9–2.3) | 0.009 | |
| DTE, ms | 81 (71–128) | 130 (97–133) | 0.093 |
| | 12.5 (8.9–16.4) | 14.2 (8.5–15.6) | 0.878 |
| | 9.3 (7.5–12.6) | 7.7 (6.2–9.9) | 0.047 |
| MR/LA area | 0.26 (0.2–0.39) | 0.11 (0.06–0.29) | 0.028 |
| LVEF, % | 26 (16–35) | 29 (26–36) | 0.401 |
| LVOT VTI, cm | 14 (8.9–20.1) | 15.5 (12.6–20) | 0.263 |
| TR peak velocity, m/s | 3.67 (3–4.18) | 2.90 (2.69–3.37) | 0.068 |
| Hydric balance | |||
| Weight difference (admission), kg | + 1.6 (− 2.1/ + 6.5) | − 5.0 (− 9.5/− 1.7) | 0.005 |
| Fluid balance (admission), ml | + 146 (− 2654/ + 4434) | − 2224 (− 7056/ + 100) | 0.005 |
HR heart rate, sBP systolic blood pressure, dBP diastolic blood pressure, mBP mean blood pressure, DTE deceleration time of mitral E wave, MR mitral regurgitation, LA left atrium, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVOT left ventricular outflow tract, VTI velocity–time integral, TR tricuspid regurgitation
*Significant difference between parameters measured under positive pressure ventilation and during the weaning trial
Fig. 2Variations of functional mitral regurgitation severity during spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) and effect of echocardiography-guided therapy. Central functional mitral regurgitation at baseline (upper left, arrow) significantly increased during the failed spontaneous breathing trial (lower left panel, arrow). After a treatment associating diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, the central mitral regurgitation which remained trivial at baseline (upper right panel, arrow) failed to significantly worsen during the second weaning trial (lower right panel, arrow), and the patient was successfully extubated
Fig. 3Variations of E wave velocity and E/E′ induced by spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) in patients who succeed at the first attempt and in those who failed during the first weaning trial but then successfully passed the second SBT after an echocardiography-guided therapy. Results are expressed in percentages of baseline values (positive-pressure ventilation). *: despite a large SBT-induced increase in E wave velocity during the second (successful) weaning trial in this patient, the absolute value of E wave was markedly lower when compared to the first (failed) SBT: baseline 2 = 65 cm/s and SBT 2 = 103 cm/s vs. baseline 1 = 88 cm/s and SBT 1 = 122 cm/s
| In high-risk patients, weaning-induced pulmonary edema is related to left ventricular overload associated with excessive fluid balance. Critical care echocardiography allows guiding treatment for successful weaning. |