| Literature DB >> 32375898 |
Raj Packianathan1, Melissa Pittorino2, Andrew Hodge3, Natalie Bruellke3, Kelly Graham4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of a new spot-on formulation of selamectin plus sarolaner were evaluated for the treatment and control of natural flea infestations on cats in two non-randomised, multi-centre clinical trials conducted in 8 different locations in Queensland, Australia.Entities:
Keywords: Cats; Ctenocephalides felis; Ectoparasites; Efficacy; Field study; Flea; Isoxazoline; Parasiticide; Revolution® Plus; Sarolaner; Selamectin; Topical
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32375898 PMCID: PMC7201956 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04099-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Locations of cats enrolled in two clinical field studies in Australia. Study A Locations (Southern Queensland): 1, Tugun; 2, Paradise Point; 3, Pialba. Study B Locations (Northern Queensland): 4a, Gracemere; 4b, Yeppoon (branch clinics and enrolled as one clinic in the study); 5, Rockhampton; 6, Townsville; 7, Stratford; 8, Mossman
Demographic characteristics of primary cats enrolled in two clinical field studies in Australia and treated with selamectin (6–12 mg/kg) plus sarolaner (1–2 mg/kg)
| Characteristic | Study A | Study B |
|---|---|---|
| Breed | ||
| Purebred | 1 (3) | 2 (6) |
| Non-purebred | 30 (97) | 32 (94) |
| Living condition | ||
| Indoors and outdoors | 17 (55) | 15 (44) |
| Mostly indoors | 9 (29) | 13 (38) |
| Mostly outdoors | 5 (16) | 6 (18) |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 17 (55) | 19 (56) |
| Female | 14 (45) | 15 (44) |
| Neutered | ||
| Yes | 24 (77) | 16 (47) |
| No | 7 (23) | 18 (53) |
| Hair type | ||
| Long | 5 (16) | 2 (6) |
| Medium | 6 (19) | 7 (21) |
| Short | 20 (65) | 25 (74) |
Flea counts, ranges of counts and arithmetic mean (AM) efficacy at each time point for primary cats treated with selamectin (6–12 mg/kg) plus sarolaner (1–2 mg/kg) in two clinical field studies in Australia
| Day of study | Study A | Study B |
|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | ||
| No. of animals | 31 | 34 |
| Arithmetic mean count | 21.0 | 10.0 |
| Range of counts | 6–107 | 6–22 |
| Day 30 | ||
| No. of animals | 29 | 29 |
| Arithmetic mean count | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Range of counts | 0–4 | 0–1 |
| AM efficacy (%)a | 98.0 | 99.7 |
| Day 60 | ||
| No. of animals | 27 | 28 |
| Arithmetic mean count | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Range of counts | 0–0 | 0–0 |
| AM efficacy (%)a | 100 | 100 |
| Day 90 | ||
| No. of animals | 21 | 26 |
| Arithmetic mean count | 0.0 | 0-0 |
| Range of counts | 0–0 | 0–0 |
| AM efficacy (%)a | 100 | 100 |
aEfficacy calculated based on comparison to arithmetic mean on Day 0