| Literature DB >> 32375744 |
Salar Siami1, Behnoush Aminzadeh2, Razieh Karimi3, Seyed Mostafa Hallaji4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the feasibility of enhancing anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge with triple, dual, and individual pretreatment of waste activated sludge with heat, alkalinity, and hydrogen peroxide. These pretreatments disrupt sludge flocs, organisms' cell walls, extracellular polymeric substance, and intracellular organic matter, which increase biodegradability and hydrolysis rate of activate sludge. In addition, the influence of various variables on methane production was analyzed using the response surface methodology with the quadratic model. Eventually, an optimized temperature and chemical concentration for the highest methane production and lowest chemical usage is suggested.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Methane production; Pretreatment; Response surface methodology; Sewage sludge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32375744 PMCID: PMC7201573 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-020-00614-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Characteristics of sludge used in the experiment
| Parameters | PS | WAS | Inoculum |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCOD (gL− 1) | 35.94 ± 1.6 | 63.51 ± 3.5 | 37.00 ± 0.8 |
| sCOD (gL− 1) | 5.25 ± 0.2 | 4.81 ± 0.1 | 4.23 ± 0.1 |
| TS (gL− 1) | 27.91 ± 1.4 | 44.20 ± 1.6 | 29.06 ± 1.4 |
| VS (gL− 1) | 20.12 ± 0.4 | 35.41 ± 1.4 | 17.40 ± 0.3 |
| TSS (gL−1) | 23.82 ± 1.1 | 39.30 ± 1.9 | 22.14 ± 0.9 |
| VSS (gL−1) | 17.76 ± 0.9 | 30.11 ± 1.3 | 14.58 ± 0.2 |
| pH | 6.36 ± 0.1 | 6.52 ± 0.3 | 7.33 ± 0.2 |
TCOD total chemical oxygen demand, sCOD soluble chemical oxygen demand, TS total solid, VS volatile solids, TSS total suspended solids, VSS volatile suspended solids
Levels and code of variables
| Variables | Symbols | Range and value of variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (Low) | 1 (Medium) | 2 (High) | ||
| Temperature (° | A | 25 | 75 | 90 |
| Alkalinity (pH) | B | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| H2O2 concentration (mg/ g TS) | C | 0 | 30 | 60 |
Experimental design with response surface methodology and the results
| No. | Input Variables | Results | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methane Production | Microbial | |||||||||
| Temp. (° | pH | H2O2 concentration (mg/ g TS) | Cumulative MP (mL/ g VS) | Increase MP (%) | COD Solubilization (%) | Increase of sCOD (g/L) | Decrease of VSS (g/L) | Increase of Protein (g/L) | Increase of Polysaccharide (g/L) | |
| 1 | 25 | 8 | 0 | 314 | 0 | 3.65 | 2.32 | 1.95 | 0.52 | 0.01 |
| 2 | 25 | 8 | 30 | 373 | 18.79 | 8.09 | 5.14 | 5.11 | 0.95 | 0.03 |
| 3 | 25 | 8 | 60 | 358 | 14.01 | 9.05 | 5.75 | 4.25 | 1.35 | 0.04 |
| 4 | 25 | 10 | 30 | 410 | 30.57 | 18.67 | 11.86 | 10.61 | 2.16 | 0.27 |
| 5 | 25 | 10 | 60 | 426 | 35.67 | 18.97 | 12.05 | 12.24 | 2.53 | 0.22 |
| 6 | 25 | 12 | 0 | 444 | 41.4 | 14.56 | 9.25 | 8.67 | 1.66 | 0.17 |
| 7 | 25 | 12 | 60 | 471 | 50 | 22.59 | 14.35 | 13.88 | 2.94 | 0.18 |
| 8 | 75 | 8 | 30 | 402 | 28.02 | 16.72 | 10.62 | 10.98 | 1.68 | 0.22 |
| 9 | 75 | 8 | 30 | 415 | 32.17 | 16.34 | 10.38 | 11.21 | 1.84 | 0.2 |
| 10 | 75 | 10 | 30 | 480 | 52.67 | 21.67 | 13.76 | 14.35 | 2.87 | 0.38 |
| 11 | 75 | 10 | 30 | 469 | 49.36 | 21.82 | 13.86 | 14.51 | 2.46 | 0.34 |
| 12 | 75 | 10 | 30 | 488 | 55.41 | 21.56 | 13.69 | 14.2 | 2.81 | 0.28 |
| 13 | 75 | 10 | 60 | 506 | 61.15 | 23.43 | 14.88 | 15.72 | 2.97 | 0.33 |
| 14 | 75 | 10 | 60 | 502 | 59.87 | 23.51 | 14.93 | 15.99 | 3.02 | 0.23 |
| 15 | 75 | 12 | 0 | 492 | 56.69 | 17.86 | 11.34 | 12.01 | 2.39 | 0.17 |
| 16 | 90 | 8 | 0 | 418 | 33.12 | 15.24 | 9.68 | 8.08 | 2.14 | 0.18 |
| 17 | 90 | 8 | 60 | 524 | 66.88 | 22.17 | 14.08 | 15.64 | 2.85 | 0.31 |
| 18 | 90 | 10 | 0 | 479 | 52.55 | 21.1 | 13.4 | 14.55 | 2.74 | 0.36 |
| 19 | 90 | 12 | 30 | 615 | 95.86 | 30.37 | 19.29 | 19.47 | 3.81 | 0.52 |
| 20 | 90 | 12 | 30 | 621 | 97.77 | 30.17 | 19.16 | 19.71 | 3.91 | 0.59 |
Fig. 1Normal plots of residuals for a COD solubilization b increase of protein
Fig. 2Contour and 3D plots for COD solubilization at different concentration of H2O2a 0 b 30 and c 60 mg/g TS
Fig. 3Contour and 3D plots for Increase of protein at different concentration of H2O2a 0 b 30 and c 60 mg/g TS
Fig. 4Daily specific biogas production
Fig. 5Effect of pretreatments on cumulative methane production. Error bars represent standard errors gained from triplicate measurements
Fig. 6Contour and 3D plots for MP at different concentration of H2O2a 0 b 30 and c 60 mg/g TS
Constraints of optimum condition
| Name | Goal | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | Lower Weight | Upper Weight | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: Temperature | Minimize | 75 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| B: pH | Minimize | 8 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| C: H2O2 Concentration | Minimize | 0 | 60 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Cumulative MP | Maximize | 314 | 621 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Increase MP | Maximize | 0 | 97.77 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Increase of sCOD | Maximize | 2.32 | 19.29 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| COD solubilization | Maximize | 3.65 | 30.37 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Decrease of VSS | Maximize | 1.95 | 19.71 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| VSS solubilization | Maximize | 4.96 | 50.15 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Increase of Protein | Maximize | 0.52 | 3.91 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Increase of Polysaccharide | Maximize | 0.01 | 0.59 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Predicted and actual observation data at the achieved optimum pretreatment
| Input Variables | Result | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp (° | pH | H2O2 Concentr-ation (mg/g TS) | Cumulative MP (mL/g VS) | Increase MP (%) | Increase of sCOD (g/g VS) | COD solubiliza-tion (%) | Decrease of VSS (g/g VS) | VSS solubilization (%) | Increase of protein (g/L) | Increase of polysaccharide (g/L) | ||||||||
| 83.2 | 10.6 | 34.8 | Pre | Act | Pre | Act | Pre | Act | Pre | Act | Pre | Act | Pre | Act | Pre | Act | Pre | Act |
| 542 | 529 | 72.6 | 71.1 | 17.1 | 17.9 | 26.9 | 28.2 | 17.9 | 18.1 | 45.4 | 45.7 | 3.35 | 3.55 | 0.46 | 0.42 | |||