| Literature DB >> 32375678 |
Anna Bobyn1,2,3, Mehdi Zarrei4,5,6, Yuankun Zhu7, Mary Hoffman1,2,8, Darren Brenner9, Adam C Resnick7, Stephen W Scherer10,11,12, Marco Gallo13,14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs) are incurable malignant brain cancers. Clear somatic genetic drivers are difficult to identify in the majority of cases. We hypothesized that this may be due to the existence of germline variants that influence tumor etiology and/or progression and are filtered out using traditional pipelines for somatic mutation calling.Entities:
Keywords: Germline variants; Pediatric high-grade glioma; Single-cell RNA-seq; Whole-genome sequencing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32375678 PMCID: PMC7201963 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-01033-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Fig. 1Linked-read sequencing data for two pHGG patients at the NEGR1 locus. a. Homozygous NEGR1 deletion in the tumor profile of patient 6 (G641). b. Homozygous deletion in the germline of patient 6 (G641B). c. Heterozygous NEGR1 deletion in the tumor profile of patient 1 (SM2932). d. Heterozygous deletion in the germline of patient 1 (SM2819). In all panels, linked-reads are organized in haplotype blocks. Each haplotype is color-coded (green/yellow or pink/purple). Unassigned linked-reads are shown in back/gray at the bottom of each panel
Summary of the frequencies of NEGR1 and BTNL8-BTNL3 deletion
| NEGR1 deletion | BTNL8-BTNL3 deletion | |
|---|---|---|
| Calgary Cohort (n = 8) | 100% | 62.5% |
| CBTTC (n = 73) | 86.3% | 17.8% |
| MSSNG controls ( | 87.1% | 48.0% |
| 1000 Genomes Project ( | 89% | 38.2% |
| Personal Genome Project Canada (n = 93) | 77.4% | 48.4% |
Datasets include the Calgary cohort, a pediatric HGG dataset from the CBTTC and individuals from the general population (coded parental control Canadian samples in MSSNG); 1000 Genomes Project CNVs obtained from the Database of Genomic Variants [DGV]; and control samples from Personal Genome Project Canada (PGPC)). Deletions are either heterozygous or homozygous
Fig. 2Single cell RNA-sequencing of NEGR1 expression levels. a. tSNE plot showing single cell RNA-sequencing data illustrates NEGR1 transcription levels in a xenograft derived from recurrence one of patient 3. b. tSNE plot showing NEGR1 transcription levels in single cell RNA-sequencing datasets generated from a xenograft derived from the third recurrence of patient 5. c. A Kaplan-Meier Curve for patient populations with either high or low expression of NEGR1
Fig. 3Linked-read sequencing data for two pHGG patients at the BTNL8-BTNL3 locus. a Homozygous BTNL8-BTNL3 deletion in the tumor profile of patient 6 (G641). b Homozygous deletion in the germline of patient 6 (G641B). c Heterozygous BTNL8-BTNL3 deletion in the tumor profile of patient 1 (SM2932). d Heterozygous deletion in the germline of patient 1(SM2819)
Fig. 4NEGR1 and BTNL8-BTNL3 deletion frequencies in the general population. a. Frequency of NEGR1 deletions in the general population for all ethnicities. b. Frequency of BTNL8-BTNL3 deletions in the general population for all ethnicities. c. NEGR1 deletions stratified by European, East Asian, South East Asian, African, American, and “Other” descent. d. BTNL8-BTNL3 deletions stratified by European, East Asian, South East Asian, African, American, and “Other” descent
NEGR1 and BTNL8-BTNL3 deletions in population controls
| NEGR1 deletion | BTNL8-BTNL3 deletion | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homozygous | Heterozygous | Homozygous | Heterozygous | |
| European ( | 36.4% | 50.1% | 8.6% | 42.7% |
| East Asian ( | 80.5% | 16.9% | 1.7% | 37.3% |
| South East Asian ( | 42.5% | 50.0% | 2.5% | 15.0% |
| African ( | 14.3% | 57.1% | 2.4% | 21.4% |
| American ( | 49.1% | 47.2% | 11.3% | 39.6% |
| Other ( | 44.6% | 41.6% | 4.0% | 30.7% |
Frequencies of the control collection (n = 2596) stratified by ethnic groups and homozygous or heterozygous deletion types
Chi-square analysis of NEGR1 deletions in the general population
| East Asian | African | American | SE Asian | Other | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91.8 | 12.8 | 6.03 | 2.88 | 6.00 | |
| 62.1 | 18.0 | 30.3 | 40.4 | ||
| 18.6 | 15.2 | 14.6 | |||
| 1.09 | 4.13 | ||||
| 2.90 |
Analysis of the parental controls from the MSSNG cohort. Values are statistically significant to 95% above the critical value 5.99 (df = 2) and shown in blue. Statistically insignificant results are shown in red
Chi-square analysis of BTNL8-BTNL3 deletions in the general population
| East Asian | African | American | SE Asian | Other | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7 | 12.7 | 0.556 | 35.4 | 21.5 | |
| 3.53 | 8.21 | 11.7 | 2.42 | ||
| 7.82 | 0.799 | 1.87 | |||
| 17.1 | 6.97 | ||||
| 8.12 |
Analysis of the parental controls from the MSSNG cohort. Values are statistically significant to 95% above the critical value 5.99 (df = 2) and shown in blue. Statistically insignificant results are shown in red
Fig. 5Model workflow for the identification of novel candidate germline variants associated with cancer. We suggest several filters to identify candidate cancer germline variants. As a first step, information on whether the variant itself or the transcription levels of its associated gene can stratify patients based on survival should be considered. Next steps should include comparing variant frequency in cancer and non-cancer populations, and adjusting for the ancestry of the cancer and non-cancer cohorts. These steps could streamline the identification of candidate germline variants associated with a specific cancer type, and which should be selected for further validation