| Literature DB >> 32375658 |
Samuel Nkansah Darko1, Henry Hanson2, Sampson Twumasi-Ankrah3, Sandra Baffour-Awuah4, Priscilla Adjei-Kusi2, Denis Yar5, Ellis Owusu-Dabo6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Praziquantel (PZQ) is the standard treatment for Schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa. However, there is evidence suggesting praziquantel treatment failure in Schistosome infections with associated potential renal impairment. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of three monthly doses of 60 mg/kg/day PZQ on schistosome egg count, liver and renal function during the treatment of urinary schistosomiasis in Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Praziquantel; Renal; Resistance; Schistosomiasis; Urinary
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32375658 PMCID: PMC7204294 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05053-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Map of study communities and sites (Rivers) in Ashanti region, Ghana
Fig. 2Sampling of study participants
Fig. 3Flowchart of experimental design
Demographics, schistosome counts and biochemical variables before treatment
| Variable | Normal Ranges | Schistosome positive | Schistosome negative | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.6 | 81.1 | |||
| 15.0 (12.5, 21.5) | 16.0 (13.0, 22.0) | 0.547 | ||
| 3.0 (2.0, 11.0) | 0 | 0.033 | ||
| 35–55 | 51.9 (48.5, 53.0) | 55.9 (52.1, 61.5) | 0.003 | |
| 20–35 | 36.7 (32.8, 40.1) | 30.5 (22.4, 33.8) | 0.005 | |
| 0–5 | 5.7 (3.4, 7.5) | 5.7 (4.5, 7.1) | 0.825 | |
| 3–22 | 14.1 (11.4, 20.2) | 14.8 (12.4, 19.2) | 0.809 | |
| 50–110 | 99.0 (77.0, 116.0) | 91.0 (75.0, 114.0) | 0.587 | |
| 9–48 | 20.0 (16.0, 26.0) | 24.0 (16.0, 33.0) | 0.243 | |
| 5–35 | 13.0 (9.0, 16.0) | 13.0 (9.0, 18.0) | 0.420 | |
| 7–40 | 33.0 (28.0, 36.0) | 30.0 (25.0, 35.0) | 0.825 | |
| 0.8 | 2.5 (1.9, 3.1) | 2.6 (2.0, 3.1) | 0.457 | |
| 60–80 | 89.0 (82.0, 92.0) | 87.0 (80.0, 91.0) | 0.840 | |
| 2.9–8.2 | 2.7 (2.1, 3.1) | 2.6 (2.1, 3.0) | 0.344 | |
| > 90 | 96.0 (80.0, 116.0) | 101.0 (88.0, 127.0) | 0.600 | |
| > 90 | 100.5 (82.5, 120.0) | 95.0 (83.0, 123.0) | 0.776 |
Sh S. haematobium egg. eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2), proportion reported as percentage (interquartile range), biochemical variables reported as median (interquartile ranges)
Fig. 4Effect of three repeated monthly doses of praziquantel 60 mg/kg on median liver enzymes and S. haematobium egg count. 1 = Pre-treatment, 2 = Before 2nd dose, 3 = Before 3rd dose, 4 = Post-treatment
Fig. 5Effect of three repeated monthly doses of praziquantel 60 mg/kg on median estimated glomerular filtration rate and S. haematobium egg count. 1 = Pre-treatment, 2 = Before 2nd dose, 3 = Before 3rd dose, 4 = Post-treatment. eGFR reported in mL/min/1.73m2
Cure rates of 60 mg/kg praziquantel at stages of repeated dose treatment
| Before 2nd dose | Before 3rd dose | Post-treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | 28 | 28 | |
| 12.0 (1.0, 17.0) | 6.0 (4.0, 38.0) | 0 | |
| 12 | 13 | 27 | |
| 42.9% | 46.4% | 96.4% |
Median eggs reported with interquartile ranges
Schistosome count and biochemical parameters after treatment
| Variable | Normal Range | Schistosome positive | Schistosome negative | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | |||
| 35–55 | 48.8 (45.4, 52.5) | 52.9 (49.6, 55.4) | 0.441 | |
| 20–35 | 35.8 (31.2, 39.1) | 37.4 (29.7, 43.0) | 0.767 | |
| 0–5 | 7.4 (5.8, 8.9) | 7.0 (6.3, 8.0) | 0.075 | |
| 3–22 | 13.6 (11.1, 20.6) | 14.2 (11.6, 16.7) | 0.260 | |
| 50–110 | 91.0 (79.0, 111.0) | 95.0 (77.0, 112.0) | 0.441 | |
| 9–48 | 23.0 (20.0, 31.0) | 26.0 (20.0, 39.0) | 0.678 | |
| 5–35 | 11.0 (8.0, 13.0) | 10.0 (9.0, 13.0) | 0.513 | |
| 7–40 | 32.0 (27.0, 35.0) | 30.0 (26.0, 33.0) | 0.722 | |
| 0.8 | 2.8 (2.3, 3.4) | 2.7 (2.1, 3.3) | 0.441 | |
| 60–80 | 85.0 (77.0, 93.0) | 85.0 (82.0, 96.0) | 0.813 | |
| 2.9–8.2 | 2.5 (2.0, 2.8) | 2.2 (1.9, 2.5) | 0.635 | |
| > 90 | 116.5 (94.0, 128.0) | 94.5 (79.0, 115.0) | 0.753 | |
| > 90 | 105.5 (87.0, 116.0) | 90.0 (75.0, 109.0) | 0.866 |
Sh S. haematobium egg, eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2), biochemical variables, ratio and eGFR reported as median (interquartile ranges)