Literature DB >> 32375585

Prevalence of Ipsilateral Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques on Computed Tomography Angiography in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Johanna M Ospel1,2, Nishita Singh, Martha Marko1, Mohammed Almekhlafi3, Dar Dowlatshahi4, Josep Puig5, Andrew Demchuk1,3, Shelagh B Coutts1, Michael D Hill1,3, Bijoy K Menon1,3, Mayank Goyal1,3.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) constitutes a large proportion of acute ischemic stroke. It is crucial to identify possible stroke etiologies in this patient subgroup to individually tailor secondary stroke prevention strategies. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of carotid plaques causing <50% stenosis in ESUS patients on computed tomography angiography and the association of these plaques with ipsilateral strokes. Methods- Patients from INTERRSeCT-a multicenter prospective study of patients with acute ischemic stroke-were included in this study if their stroke etiology was not large artery atherosclerosis (>50% stenosis), and neck computed tomography angiography was obtained. Degree of stenosis (<30% versus 30%-50%), maximum plaque thickness, degree of plaque calcification (<50% versus ≥50%), plaque irregularity, ulceration, hypodensity, carotid web, and focal vessel outpouching were assessed for both carotid arteries on computed tomography angiography. Prevalence of carotid plaques with <50% stenosis (nonstenotic plaques), ipsilateral and contralateral to the stroke, in ESUS patients was determined and compared with non-ESUS patients. Features of these plaques with versus without ipsilateral stroke in ESUS patients were compared. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine associations between nonstenotic carotid plaque, plaque characteristics, and ipsilateral stroke in ESUS patients. Results- Four hundred forty-six patients were included in the study (median age, 73 years; 218 men), 138 of which were ESUS patients (median age, 70 years; 61 men). Nonstenotic carotid plaques (with <50% stenosis) were present in 54 of 138 (39.1%) ESUS patients. Twelve (8.7%) patients had bilateral carotid plaques. Forty (60.6%) of these plaques were ipsilateral and 26 (39.4%) contralateral to the side of the stroke (P=0.004). Nonstenotic carotid plaques were significantly associated with ipsilateral strokes (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.05-3.18]). Conclusions- In patients with ESUS, nonstenotic carotid plaques were significantly more common on the side of the ischemic stroke, suggesting that these plaques could be a potential stroke etiology in patients in whom the ischemic stroke is classified currently as ESUS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography angiography; cryptogenic stroke; embolic stroke; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32375585     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  11 in total

1.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and its role in the investigation of stroke: an update.

Authors:  Ana Catarina Fonseca; José M Ferro; Ana G Almeida
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Web Browsing: High-Speed Diagnosis and Treatment of Carotid Artery Web.

Authors:  Charles DeMello Schutt; Jorge J Pesquera; Swetha Renati; Daniel J Kaplan; Maxim Mokin; David Z Rose
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Carotid web: the challenging diagnosis of an under-recognized entity.

Authors:  Emilio Rodríguez-Castro; Susana Arias-Rivas; María Santamaría-Cadavid; Iria López-Dequidt; Manuel Rodríguez-Yáñez; Antonio Jesús Mosqueira; Miguel Blanco Ulla; Fernando Vázquez Herrero; José Antonio Castiñeira; Elena Martínez-Sáez; Edurne Pérez Béliz; Nilo Mosquera; Diego Caicedo; Máximo Fraga; José Manuel Pumar
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.682

4.  Carotid artery endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Valentina Nardi; John C Benson; Anthony S Larson; Waleed Brinjikji; Luca Saba; Fredric B Meyer; Giuseppe Lanzino; Amir Lerman; Luis E Savastano
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 5.  [Remote proctoring in neuroradiological interventions].

Authors:  M Bechstein; E Goebell; J Fiehler
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  The Relationship Between Aortic Arch Calcification and Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source-A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Cai; Yu Geng; Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Etiologic reclassification of cryptogenic stroke after implantable cardiac monitoring and computed tomography angiography re-assessment.

Authors:  Francesco Mele; Giuseppe Scopelliti; Arianna Manini; Carola Ferrari Aggradi; Matteo Baiardo; Marco Schiavone; Maurizio Viecca; Andrea Ianniello; Pierluigi Bertora; Giovanni B Forleo; Leonardo Pantoni
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.682

Review 8.  The role of cross-sectional imaging of the extracranial and intracranial vasculature in embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Authors:  Hediyeh Baradaran; Hooman Kamel; Ajay Gupta
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques in Ischemic Stroke: Analysis of the STRATIS Registry.

Authors:  N Singh; J Ospel; A Mayank; M Marko; O O Zaidat; N H Mueller-Kronast; D S Liebeskind; M Goyal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.966

10.  Plaque Length Predicts the Incidence of Microembolic Signals in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke.

Authors:  Liming Zhao; Hongqin Zhao; Yicheng Xu; Aijuan Zhang; Jiatang Zhang; Chenglin Tian
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.