| Literature DB >> 32375273 |
Luis Juli-Gándara1, Ángel Vega-Zamanillo1, Miguel Ángel Calzada-Pérez1, Evelio Teijón-López-Zuazo2.
Abstract
Bituminous mixtures are not perfectly elastic materials, so their viscoelastic properties play a decisive role in knowing their behavior. This research aims to find out this behavior through the values of the resilient modulus, the dynamic modulus, and the fatigue life for asphalt concrete and porous mixtures when they are influenced by the presence of salt (NaCl, sodium chloride). The aforementioned influence of salt has been evaluated by utilizing three different methods: submerging specimens of bituminous mixture in salt water; introducing salt into the specimens as if it was aggregate and immersing the aggregate in salt water; and drying it and then manufacturing the bituminous mixture with it. As the results indicate, the mixtures submerged in salt water do not show large differences in comparison to the reference mixtures for hot mix asphalt and porous mixtures. However, for hot mix asphalt in which salt has been added as aggregate, the resilient modulus is greater than in the reference mixture. For the bituminous mixtures in which an aggregate saturated in salt water has been used for its manufacture, the results of the resilient modulus test, dynamic modulus test, and fatigue life test are lower than in the reference mixture, especially when the specimens are submerged.Entities:
Keywords: NaCl; bituminous mixture; dynamic modulus; fatigue life; resilient modulus; salt; winter road
Year: 2020 PMID: 32375273 PMCID: PMC7254262 DOI: 10.3390/ma13092126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Particle size and asphalt content of bituminous mixture.
Figure 2Passing rate and density of salt.
Figure 3Resilient modulus.
Resilient modulus.
| Series | Resilient Modulus | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-16 Surf D | PA-16 | ||||
| Dry | Wet | Dry | Wet | ||
| Reference | A | 5146 | 4710 | 1875 | 1864 |
| Specimens immersed in salt water | B1 | 5146 | 4583 | 1875 | 1670 |
| B2 | 5146 | 4544 | 1875 | 1479 | |
| B3 | 5146 | 4603 | 1875 | 2246 | |
| NaCl introduced as aggregate | C1 | 5215 | 4927 | 1936 | 1670 |
| C2 | 5470 | 5936 | 2289 | 1470 | |
| Aggregate previously saturated in salt water | D1 | 3873 | 4378 | 1813 | 1712 |
| D2 | 3258 | 3649 | 1774 | 569 | |
Resilient modulus. Standard deviation.
| Series | Standard Deviation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-16 Surf D | PA-16 | ||||
| Dry | Wet | Dry | Wet | ||
| Reference | A | 378 | 320 | 208 | 168 |
| Specimens immersed in salt water | B1 | 378 | 312 | 208 | 203 |
| B2 | 378 | 342 | 208 | 184 | |
| B3 | 378 | 350 | 208 | 192 | |
| NaCl introduced as aggregate | C1 | 278 | 301 | 236 | 211 |
| C2 | 399 | 410 | 315 | 268 | |
| Aggregate previously saturated in salt water | D1 | 287 | 354 | 305 | 242 |
| D2 | 354 | 298 | 289 | 290 | |
Figure 4Dynamic modulus test.
Goodness-of-fit statistic. Dynamic modulus.
| R² | 0.971 |
| Adjusted R² | 0.967 |
Analysis of variance. Dynamic modulus.
| Source | DF | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | F | Pr > f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 5 | 31,629,381.51 | 6,325,876.30 | 203.63 | <0.0001 |
| Error | 30 | 931,953.49 | 31,065.12 | - | - |
| Corrected Total | 35 | 32,561,335.00 | - | - | - |
Computed against model Y = Mean (Y)
Figure 5Fatigue test.
Goodness-of-fit statistic. (Number of load cycles) - (Strain). Fatigue.
| R² | 0.972 |
| Adjusted R² | 0.967 |
Analysis of variance. (Number of load cycles) - (Strain). Fatigue.
| Source | DF | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | F | Pr > f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 4 | 11.29 | 2.82 | 222.16 | < 0.0001 |
| Error | 27 | 0.33 | 0.01 | - | - |
| Corrected Total | 31 | 11.62 | - | - | - |
Computed against model Y = Mean (Y)