OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the in-hospital outcomes in patients with mitral regurgitation treated with percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BACKGROUND: There is lack of data on the outcomes of PMVR for mitral regurgitation in patients with COPD. METHODS: We analyzed the national inpatient sample (NIS) database from January 2012 to December 2016. RESULTS: A total of 9125 patients underwent PMVR in the period between January 2012 and December 2016, of whom 2,495 (27.3%) patients had concomitant COPD. Comparing COPD patients to non-COPD patients, COPD patients had higher proportion of females (48.3% vs. 46.6%, p = .16), were younger (75.8 ± 10.0 years vs. 76.4 ± 12.2 years; p = .04), had higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (17.4% vs. 13.5%; p < .01) and renal failure (39.3% vs. 37%; p < .01). After propensity matching, there was no significant difference in mortality among the COPD group versus non-COPD patients (2.6% vs. 2.9%; p = .6). Patients with COPD had higher proportion of in-hospital morbidities including St-segment elevation myocardial infarction (1.8% vs. 1.0%; p = .02), cardiogenic shock (1.4% vs. 0.4%; p < .01), vascular complications (2% vs. 0.8; p < .01), pneumothorax (1% vs. 0.4%; p < .01), and septic shock (1.2% vs. 0.4%; p < .01). Moreover, surrogates of severe disability (mechanical intubation and non-home discharges), cost of hospitalization, and length of stay were higher in the COPD group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in mortality between the COPD and non-COPD patients after PMVR. Moreover, we observed higher rates of in-hospital morbidities, surrogates of severe disability, and higher resources utilization by the COPD group.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the in-hospital outcomes in patients with mitral regurgitation treated with percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BACKGROUND: There is lack of data on the outcomes of PMVR for mitral regurgitation in patients with COPD. METHODS: We analyzed the national inpatient sample (NIS) database from January 2012 to December 2016. RESULTS: A total of 9125 patients underwent PMVR in the period between January 2012 and December 2016, of whom 2,495 (27.3%) patients had concomitant COPD. Comparing COPD patients to non-COPD patients, COPD patients had higher proportion of females (48.3% vs. 46.6%, p = .16), were younger (75.8 ± 10.0 years vs. 76.4 ± 12.2 years; p = .04), had higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (17.4% vs. 13.5%; p < .01) and renal failure (39.3% vs. 37%; p < .01). After propensity matching, there was no significant difference in mortality among the COPD group versus non-COPD patients (2.6% vs. 2.9%; p = .6). Patients with COPD had higher proportion of in-hospital morbidities including St-segment elevation myocardial infarction (1.8% vs. 1.0%; p = .02), cardiogenic shock (1.4% vs. 0.4%; p < .01), vascular complications (2% vs. 0.8; p < .01), pneumothorax (1% vs. 0.4%; p < .01), and septic shock (1.2% vs. 0.4%; p < .01). Moreover, surrogates of severe disability (mechanical intubation and non-home discharges), cost of hospitalization, and length of stay were higher in the COPD group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in mortality between the COPD and non-COPD patients after PMVR. Moreover, we observed higher rates of in-hospital morbidities, surrogates of severe disability, and higher resources utilization by the COPD group.
Authors: Roberto V P Ribeiro; Bobby Yanagawa; Jean-François Légaré; Ansar Hassan; Maral Ouzounian; Subodh Verma; Jan O Friedrich Journal: J Card Surg Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 1.620
Authors: David R Holmes; J Matthew Brennan; John S Rumsfeld; David Dai; Sean M O'Brien; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Fred H Edwards; John Carroll; David Shahian; Fred Grover; E Murat Tuzcu; Eric D Peterson; Ralph G Brindis; Michael J Mack Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Hesham Z Saleh; Kamlesh Mohan; Matthew Shaw; Omar Al-Rawi; Hany Elsayed; Martin Walshaw; John A C Chalmers; Brian M Fabri Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-01-22 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Vuyisile T Nkomo; Julius M Gardin; Thomas N Skelton; John S Gottdiener; Christopher G Scott; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mariana Mirabel; Bernard Iung; Gabriel Baron; David Messika-Zeitoun; Delphine Détaint; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Eric G Butchart; Philippe Ravaud; Alec Vahanian Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-03-09 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Juan A Crestanello; Jeffrey J Popma; David H Adams; G Michael Deeb; Mubashir Mumtaz; Barry George; Jian Huang; Michael J Reardon Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Nathaniel Mark Hawkins; Mark C Petrie; Pardeep S Jhund; George W Chalmers; Francis G Dunn; John J V McMurray Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Puja Kohli; Pedro V Staziaki; Sumbal A Janjua; Daniel A Addison; Travis R Hallett; Orla Hennessy; Richard A P Takx; Michael T Lu; Florian J Fintelmann; Marc Semigran; Robert S Harris; Bartolome R Celli; Udo Hoffmann; Tomas G Neilan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 3.240