Bethany G Kuerten1, Samuel Brotkin2, Melanie J Bonner2,3, David O Ayuku4, Festus Njuguna5, Steve M Taylor1,6,7, Eve S Puffer1,2. 1. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University. 2. Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University. 3. Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine. 4. Department of Behavioral Science, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University. 5. Department of Child Health and Paediatrics, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University. 6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine. 7. Duke Clinical Research Institute.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the types and magnitude of psychosocial burden present in caregivers who have a child with sickle cell disease (SCD) in Kenya and to identify predictors of caregiver psychosocial burden, including disease severity and financial hardship. METHODS: Primary caregivers (N = 103) of children aged 1-10 years diagnosed with SCD completed surveys assessing multiple domains of caregiver quality of life (QOL), adjustment to child illness, mental health, and financial hardship. Descriptive statistics characterize psychosocial burden, and linear models assess associations. RESULTS: On indicators of QOL, caregivers report multiple difficulties across most domains, including daily activities and physical, social, cognitive, and emotional well-being. Daily activities emerged as most burdensome. On indicators of parental adjustment to chronic illness, guilt and worry emerged as the greatest concern, followed by long-term uncertainty and unresolved sorrow and anger; relative to these, they reported higher levels of emotional resources. Financial hardship was high, as caregivers reported moderate to major financial losses due to the time spent caring for their child. General linear model analyses revealed that level of financial hardship was a significant predictor of all negative psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results document that Kenyan caregivers of children with SCD experience difficulties across multiple domains of functioning and that financial difficulties are likely associated with psychosocial burden. Results can guide intervention development for caregivers of children with SCD in low-resource, global contexts.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the types and magnitude of psychosocial burden present in caregivers who have a child with sickle cell disease (SCD) in Kenya and to identify predictors of caregiver psychosocial burden, including disease severity and financial hardship. METHODS: Primary caregivers (N = 103) of children aged 1-10 years diagnosed with SCD completed surveys assessing multiple domains of caregiver quality of life (QOL), adjustment to child illness, mental health, and financial hardship. Descriptive statistics characterize psychosocial burden, and linear models assess associations. RESULTS: On indicators of QOL, caregivers report multiple difficulties across most domains, including daily activities and physical, social, cognitive, and emotional well-being. Daily activities emerged as most burdensome. On indicators of parental adjustment to chronic illness, guilt and worry emerged as the greatest concern, followed by long-term uncertainty and unresolved sorrow and anger; relative to these, they reported higher levels of emotional resources. Financial hardship was high, as caregivers reported moderate to major financial losses due to the time spent caring for their child. General linear model analyses revealed that level of financial hardship was a significant predictor of all negative psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results document that Kenyan caregivers of children with SCD experience difficulties across multiple domains of functioning and that financial difficulties are likely associated with psychosocial burden. Results can guide intervention development for caregivers of children with SCD in low-resource, global contexts.
Authors: Léon Tshilolo; George Tomlinson; Thomas N Williams; Brígida Santos; Peter Olupot-Olupot; Adam Lane; Banu Aygun; Susan E Stuber; Teresa S Latham; Patrick T McGann; Russell E Ware Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daisy R Singla; Brandon A Kohrt; Laura K Murray; Arpita Anand; Bruce F Chorpita; Vikram Patel Journal: Annu Rev Clin Psychol Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 18.561
Authors: Pim Cuijpers; Matthias Berking; Gerhard Andersson; Leanne Quigley; Annet Kleiboer; Keith S Dobson Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Patrick O Monahan; Enbal Shacham; Michael Reece; Kurt Kroenke; Willis Owino Ong'or; Otieno Omollo; Violet Naanyu Yebei; Claris Ojwang Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Frédéric B Piel; Anand P Patil; Rosalind E Howes; Oscar A Nyangiri; Peter W Gething; Mewahyu Dewi; William H Temperley; Thomas N Williams; David J Weatherall; Simon I Hay Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Tonya M Palermo; Emily F Law; Maggie Bromberg; Jessica Fales; Christopher Eccleston; Anna C Wilson Journal: Pain Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Manase Kilonzi; Dorkasi L Mwakawanga; Fatuma Felix Felician; Hamu J Mlyuka; Lulu Chirande; David T Myemba; Godfrey Sambayi; Ritah F Mutagonda; Wigilya P Mikomangwa; Joyce Ndunguru; Agnes Jonathan; Paschal Ruggajo; Irene Kida Minja; Emmanuel Balandya; Julie Makani; Nathanael Sirili Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-04 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Julie M Buser; Ashura Bakari; Abdul-Aziz Seidu; Alex Osei-Akoto; Vivian Paintsil; Rexford Amoah; Benjamin Otoo; Cheryl A Moyer Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 1.812