Literature DB >> 3237431

The use of next-of-kin to estimate pain in cancer patients.

Jack O'Brien1, Anita Francis.   

Abstract

The clinical management of pain could be improved if more were known about the intensity and duration of the pain. The cancer patient, however, is often unable to communicate this information to caregivers. Relying on next-of-kin to provide information about the patient's pain could help, but little has been done to verify next-of-kin responses with respect to subjective experiences. For the present study 42 pairs of cancer patients and their next-of-kin were independently surveyed in 1982 in Washington state regarding their cancer pain and various aspects of medical treatment to determine whether proxies can give reliable responses. Close agreement between subject and next-of-kin was observed for the items which were salient and had a limited choice of responses, such as the presence of pain. Agreement in the aggregate was achieved for the items having several possible responses, such as the intensity and frequency of pain. Correspondence was virtually random for those items which had a variety of listed responses. The use of proxies in obtaining information, future research directions, and difficulties with measuring agreement are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3237431     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90224-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  6 in total

1.  Criterion-based validation of the EORTC QLQ-C36 in advanced melanoma: the CIPS questionnaire and proxy raters.

Authors:  V Sigurdardóttir; Y Brandberg; M Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The effect of mode of administration on medical outcomes study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS.

Authors:  A W Wu; D L Jacobson; R A Berzon; D A Revicki; C van der Horst; C J Fichtenbaum; M S Saag; L Lynn; D Hardy; J Feinberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians.

Authors:  K A Wilson; A J Dowling; M Abdolell; I F Tannock
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Assessment of cancer pain: a continuous challenge.

Authors:  S A Grossman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Agreement between self reports and proxy reports of quality of life in epilepsy patients.

Authors:  R D Hays; B G Vickrey; B P Hermann; K Perrine; J Cramer; K Meador; K Spritzer; O Devinsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Do Cohabitants Reliably Complete Questionnaires for Patients in a Terminal Cancer Stage when Assessing Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Anxiety?

Authors:  Olivier Q Groot; Nuno Rui Paulino Pereira; Michiel E R Bongers; Paul T Ogink; Erik T Newman; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Kevin A Raskin; Santiago A Lozano-Calderon; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.