| Literature DB >> 32373575 |
Dongqiang Zhang1, Jing Zhao1, Ping Yang1, Yanan Chen1, Yiqun Fan2.
Abstract
High stability Pd/ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membranes were prepared by electroless plating. Ceramic membranes fabricated by an in situ oxidation method were used as an inter-diffusion barrier between the Pd layer and the Ti-Al alloy support of the membranes to prevent intermetallic diffusion. The stabilities of the ceramic membranes at high temperatures in an H2 atmosphere were investigated. The permeation performances and stabilities of the Pd/ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membranes were also studied. The results showed that the thickness, pore size, and microstructure of the ceramic membranes did not change significantly after the treatment in an H2 atmosphere at high temperatures, indicating that the ceramic membranes prepared by the in situ oxidation method were stable in an H2 atmosphere at high temperatures. The thickness of the Pd layer was ~13 μm. The hydrogen permeability and H2/N2 selectivity of the Pd composite membranes at 773 K were 2.13 × 10-3 mol m-2 s-1 Pa-0.5 and 600, respectively. In addition, the H2 flux, N2 flux, and H2/N2 selectivity of the composite membranes remained nearly constant over three heat cycles (under the same conditions), indicating that the structures of the Pd/ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membranes were stable.Entities:
Keywords: Pd composite membrane; Ti-Al alloy; ceramic; hydrogen separation; in situ oxidation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32373575 PMCID: PMC7179701 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Percent of weight gain of ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membrane after treatment in H2 atmosphere at different temperatures for 20 h.
| mfresh/g | 5.45 | 5.72 | 6.19 |
| Oxidation condition | 750°C/2 h | 750°C/2 h | 750°C/2 h |
| moxidation/g | 6.33 | 6.57 | 7.24 |
| Reduction condition | 500°C/H2/20 h | 600°C/H2/20 h | 700°C/H2/20 h |
| mreduction/g | 6.33 | 6.57 | 7.24 |
| Δm(mreduction-moxidation)/g | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Percent of N2 flux change of ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membrane after treatment in H2 atmosphere at different temperatures for 20 h.
| ΔP/MPa | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Jfresh/m3·m−2·h−1 | 239.58 | 258.66 | 260.78 |
| Oxidation condition | 750°C/2 h | 750°C/2 h | 750°C/2 h |
| Joxidation/m3·m−2·h−1 | 24.59 | 33.50 | 23.75 |
| Reduction condition | 500°C/H2/20 h | 600°C/H2/20 h | 700°C/H2/20 h |
| Jreduction/m3·m−2·h−1 | 20.35 | 36.04 | 20.35 |
| ΔJ(Jreduction- Joxidation)/m3·m−2·h−1 | −4.24 | 2.54 | −3.40 |
Figure 1(A) Oxidized at 750°/2 h X300. (B) 700°/H2/20 h X300. (C) Oxidized at 750°/2 h X1200. (D) 700°/H2/20 h X1200. Surface SEM micrographs of the ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membrane in H2 atmosphere at different temperature for 20 h.
Figure 2(A) Ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membrane. (B) 700°/H2/20 h. EDX characterization of the ceramic/T i-Al alloy composite membrane after treatment in H2 atmosphere at different temperature for 20 h.
Figure 3XRD patterns of the ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membrane in H2 atmosphere at different temperature for 20 h.
Figure 4(A) Surface. (B) Cross-section. SEM photographs of the Pd/ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membrane.
Figure 5The dependence of hydrogen flux of Pd/ceramic/Ti-Al alloy composite membrane on - at various temperatures.
Figure 6H2/N2 selectivity as a function of the transmembrane pressure at different temperature.
Comparison of the membrane prepared in this study and similar studies in the literatures.
| PSS/CeO2/Pd | 0.2 | 13 | 500 | 0.5 | 1.27 × 10−3 | ∞ | Tong et al., |
| PSS/Oxide/Pd | 0.2 | 21.3 | 450 | 0.5 | 1.43 × 10−4 | ∞ | Rothenbergera et al., |
| PSS/WO3/Pd | 0.2 | 12 | 500 | 0.5 | 2 × 10−3 | 10,000 | Zahedia et al., |
| PSS/NaAZ80/Pd | 0.2 | 19 | 450 | 0.5 | 1.1 × 10−3 | 608 | Bosko et al., |
| PSS/Al2O3/Pd | 0.2 | 5 | 450 | 0.5 | 2.48 × 10−3 | ∞ | Li et al., |
| Ti-Al/TiO2/Pd | 0.28 | 14 | 500 | 0.5 | 1.07 × 10−3 | ∞ | Zhang et al., |
| Ti-Al/ceramic/Pd | 0.44 | 13 | 500 | 0.5 | 2.13 × 10−3 | 600 | This work |
Figure 7Arrhenius relation between the hydrogen permeance and temperature.
Comparisons of activation energy of different palladium membranes.
| Pd foil | 50 | 11.4 | 350–600 | Jung et al., |
| Pd/PSS | 20 | 16.38 | 350 | Mardilovich et al., |
| Pd/Al2O3 | 15 | 10 | 350 | Dittmeyer et al., |
| Pd/Al2O3 | 2.4–6 | 12.7–18.5 | 330–450 | Keuler et al., |
| Pd/TiO2 | 0.3–0.4 | 21.27 | 500 | Wu et al., |
| Pd/TiO2/Ti-Al | 14 | 13.65 | 350–500 | Zhang et al., |
| Pd/ceramic/Ti-Al | 13 | 13.86 | 400–500 | This work |
Figure 8Variation of the hydrogen flux of Pd composite membrane during thermal cycling (ΔP = 0.1 MPa).
Figure 10Variation of the H2/N2 selectivity of Pd composite membrane during thermal cycling (ΔP = 0.1 MPa).