Heitor Fontes da Silva1, Douglas Rangel Goulart2,3, Alexander Tadeu Sverzut4, Sergio Olate5, Márcio de Moraes4. 1. Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University Unicamp, Av. Limeira, 901, Areiao, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13414-903, Brazil. 2. Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University Unicamp, Av. Limeira, 901, Areiao, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13414-903, Brazil. douglasrgoulart@gmail.com. 3. Dental School University of Goiás - UFG, Goiânia, Brazil. douglasrgoulart@gmail.com. 4. Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University-Unicamp, São Paulo, Brazil. 5. Department of Oral, Facial and Maxillofacial Surgery and Center of Excellence in Surgical and Morphological Studies, University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) has been extensively used for reconstruction of posterior area of maxilla in sinus lift procedure; however, a new graft material (Lumina-Bone Porous®), that has a different manufacturing process, has not been yet compared in clinical and histological terms. The manufacturing process of bovine bone graft is related to size and porosity of the particles, and this can change osteoconductive property of the material and bone formation. The use of Lumina-Porus® could improve bone formation, reduce the remaining particles of the biomaterial using a low-cost material. The aim of this research was to compare the clinical, radiological, and histomorphometrical results from maxillary sinus lift with two different anorganic bovine bone substitutes Bio-Oss® (control) and Lumina-Bone Porous® (test). RESULTS: A split-mouth study was performed with 13 volunteers. The mean bone ridge height in the deepest portion of maxillary sinuses floor was 3.11 ± 0.83 mm in the Bio-Oss® and 2.38 ± 0.75 mm in the Lumina-Bone Porous®. After sinus lift, the Bio-Oss® group shows bone ridge height of 11.56 ± 2.03 mm and Lumina-Bone® of 10.62 ± 1.93 mm. The increase in alveolar bone height scores was significant between pre-augmentation and 6 months after SL in both groups (p < 0.001). No statistical significant difference in newly formed bone in the Bio-Oss® group (20.4 ± 5.4%), and Lumina-Bone Porous® (22.8 ± 8.5%) was histomorphological observed (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the residual graft particles showed significant difference between the Bio-Oss® group (19.9 ± 8.6%) and Lumina-Bone Porous® (14.6 ± 5.6%) (p < 0.05). The survival rate of dental implants for augmented area with Lumina Bone Porous® was 88.88%, while for Bio-Oss® group was 100%. CONCLUSION: Both materials Bio-Oss® and Lumina-Bone Porous® can be used in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation with good predictability in clinical, radiographical, and histological point of view.
BACKGROUND: Anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) has been extensively used for reconstruction of posterior area of maxilla in sinus lift procedure; however, a new graft material (Lumina-Bone Porous®), that has a different manufacturing process, has not been yet compared in clinical and histological terms. The manufacturing process of bovine bone graft is related to size and porosity of the particles, and this can change osteoconductive property of the material and bone formation. The use of Lumina-Porus® could improve bone formation, reduce the remaining particles of the biomaterial using a low-cost material. The aim of this research was to compare the clinical, radiological, and histomorphometrical results from maxillary sinus lift with two different anorganic bovine bone substitutes Bio-Oss® (control) and Lumina-Bone Porous® (test). RESULTS: A split-mouth study was performed with 13 volunteers. The mean bone ridge height in the deepest portion of maxillary sinuses floor was 3.11 ± 0.83 mm in the Bio-Oss® and 2.38 ± 0.75 mm in the Lumina-Bone Porous®. After sinus lift, the Bio-Oss® group shows bone ridge height of 11.56 ± 2.03 mm and Lumina-Bone® of 10.62 ± 1.93 mm. The increase in alveolar bone height scores was significant between pre-augmentation and 6 months after SL in both groups (p < 0.001). No statistical significant difference in newly formed bone in the Bio-Oss® group (20.4 ± 5.4%), and Lumina-Bone Porous® (22.8 ± 8.5%) was histomorphological observed (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the residual graft particles showed significant difference between the Bio-Oss® group (19.9 ± 8.6%) and Lumina-Bone Porous® (14.6 ± 5.6%) (p < 0.05). The survival rate of dental implants for augmented area with Lumina Bone Porous® was 88.88%, while for Bio-Oss® group was 100%. CONCLUSION: Both materials Bio-Oss® and Lumina-Bone Porous® can be used in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation with good predictability in clinical, radiographical, and histological point of view.
Authors: Carlos Ricardo de Queiroz Martiniano; Lídia Audrey Rocha Valadas; Jose Ronildo Lins do Carmo Filho; Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes Alves; Mara Assef Leitão Lotif; Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior; Thereza Cristina Farias Botelho Dantas; Luciane Lacerda Franco Rocha Rodrigues; Carlos Eduardo Francischone Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Ruxandra Elena Caracaş; Horia Octavian Manolea; Ioana Mitruţ; Andrei Mihai Caracaş; Alex Ioan Sălan; Maria Alexandra Drăghici; Ana Maria Rîcă Journal: Curr Health Sci J Date: 2021-09-30