Literature DB >> 32372051

Bioinformatic prediction of potential T cell epitopes for SARS-Cov-2.

Kazuma Kiyotani1, Yujiro Toyoshima2, Kensaku Nemoto2, Yusuke Nakamura2.   

Abstract

To control and prevent the current COVID-19 pandemic, the development of novel vaccines is an emergent issue. In addition, we need to develop tools that can measure/monitor T-cell and B-cell responses to know how our immune system is responding to this deleterious virus. However, little information is currently available about the immune target epitopes of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) to induce host immune responses. Through a comprehensive bioinformatic screening of potential epitopes derived from the SARS-CoV-2 sequences for HLAs commonly present in the Japanese population, we identified 2013 and 1399 possible peptide epitopes that are likely to have the high affinity (<0.5%- and 2%-rank, respectively) to HLA class I and II molecules, respectively, that may induce CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses. These epitopes distributed across the structural (spike, envelope, membrane, and nucleocapsid proteins) and the nonstructural proteins (proteins corresponding to six open reading frames); however, we found several regions where high-affinity epitopes were significantly enriched. By comparing the sequences of these predicted T cell epitopes to the other coronaviruses, we identified 781 HLA-class I and 418 HLA-class II epitopes that have high homologies to SARS-CoV. To further select commonly-available epitopes that would be applicable to larger populations, we calculated population coverages based on the allele frequencies of HLA molecules, and found 2 HLA-class I epitopes covering 83.8% of the Japanese population. The findings in the current study provide us valuable information to design widely-available vaccine epitopes against SARS-CoV-2 and also provide the useful information for monitoring T-cell responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32372051      PMCID: PMC7200206          DOI: 10.1038/s10038-020-0771-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


Introduction

In December 2019, a cluster of several severe pneumonia cases of unknown etiology was found in the city of Wuhan in Hubei province of China. Shortly thereafter, a novel Betacoronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was identified as a causative microbial agent to cause severe acute respiratory disease. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of a coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) as public health emergency of international concern and put in place a series of temporary recommendations on January 30. The current outbreak of COVID-19 has nearly 3 million confirmed cases worldwide with more than 200,000 deaths, as of April 27, 2020, according to the WHO. The genome sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 were reported to consist of ~30,000 nucleotides with high sequence similarities to Betacoronavirus, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV; 79%) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV; 50%) [1-3]. The SARS-CoV-2 genome, like other coronaviruses, encodes for multiple structural and nonstructural proteins. The structural proteins include spike protein (S), envelope protein (E), membrane glycoprotein (M), nucleocapsid phosphoprotein (N), and the nonstructural proteins include open reading frame 1ab (ORF1ab), ORF3a, ORF6, ORF7a, ORF8, and ORF10. The previous studies have suggested that SARS-CoV-2 has putatively a similar cell entry mechanism and human cell receptor usage [4, 5]. Many researches are now underway to develop effective interventions for controlling and preventing the COVID-19 pandemic, including therapeutic drugs such as inhibitors of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase or the viral protease, and blockers of virus-cell membrane fusion as well as vaccines, and large scale clinical trials have just begun [6, 7]. For the vaccine design against SARS-CoV-2 and the evaluation of immunogenicity of candidate vaccines, it is important to predict epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 and detect their immune responses to SARS-CoV-2. However, little information is currently available on which parts of the SARS-CoV-2 sequence are important for our immune responses. Therefore, in the current study, we comprehensively screened potential T cell epitopes from the SARS-CoV-2 sequence using bioinformatic tools, and also assessed the conservation of these epitopes across different coronavirus species, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV.

Methods

Coronavirus sequences

Full-length viral nucleotide sequences of SARS-CoV-2 (accession number MN908947 and MN996527-MN996531) [1, 2], SARS-CoV (accession number AY274119, AY278488 and AY390556), bat-derived SARS-like coronavirus (bat-SL-CoV) RaTG13 (accession number MN996532), and MERS-CoV (accession number JX869059) were downloaded from the NCBI GenBank.

Comparison of coronavirus sequences

Alignment of downloaded sequences was done with Genetyx software (version 8.0.0). The similarity among the sequences was visualized using SimPlot software (version 3.5.1) [8], with the consensus sequence of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from Wuhan-Hu-1 (MN908947) as the query.

T cell epitope prediction for SARS-CoV-2

Epitope prediction was carried out using the predicted proteins, including S, E, N, M, and ORFs (corresponding to accession numbers QHD43415-QHD43423, QHI42199) of the reference SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 (accession number MN908947). To predict HLA-class I epitopes, we selected 7, 10, 8 of human leukocyte antigen-A (HLA-A), HLA-B, HLA-C alleles, respectively, which were reported to be present in more than 5% frequencies in the Japanese population (Supplementary Table 1) [9]. For HLA-class II epitope prediction, we selected 5 and 6 haplotypes of HLA-DPA1-DPB1 and HLA-DQA1-DQB1, respectively, and 7 alleles of HLA-DRB1 that are frequently observed in the Japanese populations (Supplementary Table 1) [9, 10]. Binding affinity to HLA class I molecules was calculated for all 9- and 10-mer peptides from SARS-CoV-2 proteins using NetMHCv4.0 and NetMHCpanv4.0 software [11, 12]. We selected the top 0.5%-ranked epitopes based on the prediction score as strongly binding epitopes. Binding affinity to HLA class II molecules was calculated for all 15-mer peptides from SARS-CoV-2 proteins using NetMHCIIpanv3.1 software [13]. We applied the threshold of top 2%-ranked epitopes based on the prediction score as strong binders.

Mutation analysis

To identify mutations of SARS-CoV-2, we used a total of 6421 SARS-CoV-2 sequences isolated in different areas, including 587 sequences from Asia, 1918 from North America, 3190 from Europe, and 726 from Oceania regions, which were deposited in the Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data as of 18 April 2020. We first aligned each of these SARS-CoV-2 sequences to the reference sequence SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 (accession number MN908947) using BLAT software [14]. After the alignment, we extracted nucleotide sequences corresponding to individual proteins of SARS-CoV-2, translated them to amino acid sequences, and then compared them to reference amino acid sequences of SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 (accession numbers QHD43415-QHD43423, QHI42199).

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the enrichment of epitopes and differences of mutation rates of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from different areas. Statistical analysis was carried out using the R statistical environment version 3.6.1.

Results

We first screened potential epitopes that are likely to be presented on certain HLA class I molecules, HLA-A, B, and C molecules, which are commonly observed (frequencies of more than 5%) in the Japanese population [9], using netMHC4.0 and netMHCpan4.0 algorithm [11, 12]. We selected the top 0.5%-ranked (high affinity) peptides derived from the SARS-CoV-2 protein sequences and obtained a total of 2013 unique predicted epitopes (Fig. 1, Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2). The predicted epitopes were significantly enriched in the M protein (P = 0.00062, odds ratio = 1.64), whereas less enriched in the N protein (P = 0.0074, odds ratio = 0.69). We then performed a screening of HLA-class II-candidate peptide epitopes that show the high affinity to HLA-DPA1, DPB1, DQA1, DQB1, and DRB1, which are common (frequencies of more than 5%) in the Japanese populations [9, 10], using netMHCIIpan3.1 algorithm [13]. We found a total of 1399 possible HLA-class II epitopes after selecting top 2%-ranked peptides (Fig. 1, Table 1 and Supplementary Table 3). The predicted HLA-class II epitopes were enriched in the M protein (P = 0.000051, odds ratio = 1.92), ORF3a (P = 0.0000016, odds ratio = 2.00), and ORF6 (P = 0.000000039, odds ratio = 4.22), whereas less enriched in the N protein (P = 0.00031, odds ratio = 0.53).
Fig. 1

Summary of SARS-CoV-2-dreived T cell epitopes. a Distribution of SARS-CoV-2-dreived HLA-class I and II epitopes with the high binding affinity derived from the SARS-CoV-2 protein sequence (SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1) [1]. Red bars represent strong binding affinity epitopes with <0.5% rank and 2% rank, to HLA class I and class II, respectively, for each HLA molecule. b Genomic organization of SARS-CoV-2. ORF, open reading frame, S spike, E envelope, M membrane, N nucleocapsid proteins. c Similarity plot based on the full-length genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2. Genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2_WIV02 (accession number MN996527), SARS-CoV_GZ02 (AY390556), and Bat-CoV_RaTG13 (MN996532) were compared with SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 (MN908947)

Table 1

SARS-CoV-2-derived T cell epitopes predicted with high affinity to HLA molecules

ProteinLength of protein (amino acids)Number of epitopes
HLA-class I epitopes (rank ≤ 0.5%)HLA-class II epitopes (rank ≤ 2%)
AllHLA-AHLA-BHLA-CAllHLA-DPHLA-DQHLA-DR
ORF1ab709614786659375881002268377572
S1273248105159110154485488
ORF3a2756930482874332546
E751811115113011
M2227236352557162135
ORF661844228101213
ORF7a1212611189161006
ORF812122111410184108
N419602135213241712
ORF10381241077700
Total201389812718051399403516791
Summary of SARS-CoV-2-dreived T cell epitopes. a Distribution of SARS-CoV-2-dreived HLA-class I and II epitopes with the high binding affinity derived from the SARS-CoV-2 protein sequence (SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1) [1]. Red bars represent strong binding affinity epitopes with <0.5% rank and 2% rank, to HLA class I and class II, respectively, for each HLA molecule. b Genomic organization of SARS-CoV-2. ORF, open reading frame, S spike, E envelope, M membrane, N nucleocapsid proteins. c Similarity plot based on the full-length genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2. Genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2_WIV02 (accession number MN996527), SARS-CoV_GZ02 (AY390556), and Bat-CoV_RaTG13 (MN996532) were compared with SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 (MN908947) SARS-CoV-2-derived T cell epitopes predicted with high affinity to HLA molecules Since it is reported that SARS-CoV-2 has about 79% and 50% nucleotide sequence homology to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, respectively [1-3], we compared the homology of predicted SARS-CoV-2 epitope sequences to 3 SARS-CoVs (BJ01, GZ02, and Tor2) and MERS-CoV to evaluate their cross-reactivities (Table 2 and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). 781 (38.8%) of the 2013 HLA-class I epitopes are conserved in all the three SARS-CoV sequences. Among them, 633 (81.0%) are located in ORF1ab, and 58 (7.4%), 15 (1.9%), 28 (3.6%), and 33 (4.2%) peptides are located in S, E, M, and N proteins, respectively. 36 (1.8%) of the HLA-class I epitopes show 100% sequence identity to the MERS-CoV protein sequence, and among them, 33 and 3 are located in ORF1ab and S proteins, respectively. Thirty epitopes in ORF1ab are common to both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Among the 1399 possible HLA-class II epitopes, 418 (29.9%) show 100% sequence identity to all the three SARS-CoVs; 362 (86.7%), 40 (11.0%), 4 (1.1%), 4 (1.1%), and 7 (1.9%) are located in ORF1ab, S, E, M, and N proteins, respectively. Ten (2.4%) epitopes, all of which are in ORF1ab, are also conserved in MERS-CoV.
Table 2

SARS-CoV-2-derived T cell epitopes common to SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV

ProteinLength of protein (amino acids)Number of common epitopes to SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV
HLA-class I epitopesHLA-class II epitopes
SARS-CoVMERS-CoVSARS- and MERS-CoVsSARS-CoVMERS-CoVSARS- and MERS-CoVs
ORF1ab70966333330362109
S127358304000
ORF3a275400000
E751500400
M2222800400
ORF661000000
ORF7a121300100
ORF8121700000
N4193300700
ORF1038000000
Total7813630418109
SARS-CoV-2-derived T cell epitopes common to SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV T cell epitopes, which are likely to be presented commonly on multiple HLA molecules, could cover a larger proportion of individuals/patients. Therefore, we estimated population coverages of SARS-CoV-2-derived, HLA-class I- and II-presented epitopes with high binding affinity on the basis of the allele/haplotype frequencies of HLA (Table 3 and Supplementary Tables 4, 5 and 6). Two epitopes in ORF1ab, ORF1ab2168-2176, and ORF1ab4089-4098, that were predicted to have strong affinity to HLA-A*24:02, HLA-A*02:01, and HLA-A*02:06 showed the highest coverage of 83.8% of the Japanese population. ORF1ab2168-2176 was also predicted as an epitope binding to four HLA-C molecules, including HLA-C*01:02, HLA-C*08:01, HLA-C*12:02, and HLA-C*14:02, which cover 76.5% of the Japanese. Two epitopes in S protein, S268-277, and S448-457, covered more than 70% of Japanese. HLA-oligomers with these peptides are also useful for monitoring the CD8+ T-cell responses in the patients and silently-infected individuals.
Table 3

SARS-CoV-2-derived HLA-class I epitopes with high coverage of Japanese population based on HLA-A frequency

ProteinPosition in proteinPeptide lengthPeptide sequencePopulation coveragea
HLA-AHLA-BHLA-C
ORF1ab21689YMPYFFTLL83.8%A*02:01, A*02:06, A*24:020.0%76.5%C*01:02, C*08:01, C*12:02, C*14:02
ORF1ab408910FTYASALWEI83.8%A*02:01, A*02:06, A*24:0222.0%B*52:0122.2%C*12:02
ORF1ab365310VYMPASWVMR75.7%A*24:02, A*31:01, A*33:030.0%0.0%
S44810NYNYLYRLFR75.7%A*24:02, A*31:01, A*33:030.0%0.0%
ORF1ab365410YMPASWVMRI75.1%A*02:01, A*24:0214.1%B*51:010.0%
ORF1ab167410CYLATALLTL75.1%A*02:01, A*24:020.0%0.0%
ORF1ab641810LYLDAYNMMI75.1%A*02:01, A*24:020.0%0.0%
S26810GYLQPRTFLL75.1%A*02:01, A*24:020.0%0.0%
ORF3a10610LYLYALVYFL75.1%A*02:01, A*24:020.0%0.0%
ORF1ab360510FLYENAFLPF72.3%A*02:06, A*24:0224.3%B*15:01, B*46:0174.7%C*03:04, C*07:02, C*08:01, C*12:02, C*14:03
ORF1ab312610IQWMVMFTPL72.3%A*02:06, A*24:0233.4%0.0%

aCalculated based on the allele frequency of HLA (Supplementary Table 1)

SARS-CoV-2-derived HLA-class I epitopes with high coverage of Japanese population based on HLA-A frequency aCalculated based on the allele frequency of HLA (Supplementary Table 1) All replicating viruses, including coronavirus, accumulate some mutations that persist due to natural selection, and these mutations contribute to an escape from immune responses. Thus, we finally investigated mutation rates in 6421 SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences isolated from patients/individuals in four different regions, including Asia, North America, Europe, and Oceania, and identified a total of 156 amino acid mutations, which were observed at more than 0.5% frequencies (Fig. 2, Table 4 and Supplementary Table 7). ORF1ab P4715L and S D614G, which were previously reported [15, 16], were commonly found in all the four regions, although the frequencies of ORF1ab 4715L and S 614G types were significantly lower in Asian countries than other countries (15.4% vs. 52.6–73.7%; P = 3.81 × 10−125). ORF1ab P5828L and ORF1ab Y5865C were predominant in only North America (30.6% vs. others 0–7.8%; P = 3.26 × 10−237 and 31.4% vs. 0–8.1%; 5.54 × 10−246, respectively). N P13L was frequently observed in only Oceania (10.5% vs. others 0.13–1.7%; P = 4.41 × 10−64) and N R203K/G204R were observed at higher frequencies in Oceania and Europe compared with the other regions (14.7–27.6% vs. 3.6–5.3%; P = 2.56 × 10−105). We found no mutation in the epitope sequences described above.
Fig. 2

Distribution of mutation rates of SARS-CoV-2. A total of 6421 SARS-CoV-2 sequences isolated from four different regions; 587 viruses from an Asian region, 1918 from a North American region, 3190 from European countries, and 726 from an Oceanian region, were compared with the reference protein sequence of SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 [1]. 156 amino acid mutations, which were observed at more than 0.5% frequencies in at least one region, were plotted

Table 4

Mutations frequently (≥10%) observed in SARS-CoV-2 isolated from four different regions

ProteinPosition in proteinReference amino acidaMutant amino acidMutation frequency
Asia (N = 587)North America (N = 1918)Europe (N = 3190)Oceania (N = 726)
ORF1ab265TI0.03460.4240.1040.171
ORF1ab3606LF0.2480.04380.1780.17
ORF1ab4715PL0.1540.5870.7370.526
ORF1ab5828PL00.3060.005990.0783
ORF1ab5865YC00.3140.005300.0805
S614DG0.1550.5860.7360.526
ORF3a57QH0.04260.4890.1420.204
ORF3a251GV0.09910.02560.1720.121
ORF884LS0.2220.3510.02950.206
N13PL0.01710.003130.001260.105
N203RK0.05320.03650.2760.148
N204GR0.05320.03550.2760.147

aProtein sequence based on the reference SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 sequence (GenBank accession number MN908947)

Distribution of mutation rates of SARS-CoV-2. A total of 6421 SARS-CoV-2 sequences isolated from four different regions; 587 viruses from an Asian region, 1918 from a North American region, 3190 from European countries, and 726 from an Oceanian region, were compared with the reference protein sequence of SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 [1]. 156 amino acid mutations, which were observed at more than 0.5% frequencies in at least one region, were plotted Mutations frequently (≥10%) observed in SARS-CoV-2 isolated from four different regions aProtein sequence based on the reference SARS-CoV-2_Wuhan-Hu-1 sequence (GenBank accession number MN908947)

Discussion

To control the current COVID-19 pandemic and prevent the second pandemic in the near future, the development of new drugs and vaccines, and the establishment of tools investigating the immune responses in patients or silently-infected individuals are urgent issues. Especially, effective vaccination or immunotherapy could play a significant role in suppressing the spread of the virus. Since antibodies recognize cell surface proteins, the targets of antibody-based vaccine were limited. Upon viral infection, the viral proteins express in the infected cells and are processed into small peptides by proteasomes. These peptides are then presented by HLA molecules on the surface of the infected cells and recognized by T cells through their T cell receptors. Thus, the potential T cell epitopes can be derived from any of the viral structural and nonstructural proteins. In this study, using the bioinformatics tools, we comprehensively screened potential SARS-CoV-2-derived, HLA-class I- and II-presented epitopes for 43 HLA alleles that are common in the Japanese population, and identified 2013 and 1399 epitopes, respectively. 781 HLA-class I and 418 HLA-class II epitopes are considered to be common between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV (Table 2). We found that four epitopes, S1060-1068, S1220-1229, N222-230, and N315-324 of SARS-CoV-2, have exactly same sequences reported as immunogenic SARS-CoV-derived epitopes for HLA-A*02:01, that correspond to S1042-1050, S1203-1211, N223-231, and N317-325 of SARS-CoV, respectively [17, 18]. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2-derived S1060-1068 epitope is also predicted as high affinity epitopes for HLA-A*02:06 (belonging to the same HLA-A*02 family), HLA-B*52:01, and HLA-C*12:02. In the Japanese population, HLA-A*24:02 is the most common HLA-A molecule with the allelic frequency of 37.8% (implying that 61.3% of the Japanese have at least one HLA-A*24:02 allele), followed by 12.3% and 9.6% of HLA-A*02:01 and HLA-A*02:06, respectively. Two epitopes in ORF1ab, ORF1ab2168-2176, and ORF1ab4089-4098, latter of which is conserved in SARS-CoV, were predicted to have the strong affinity to HLA-A*24:02 as well as HLA-A*02:01 and HLA-A*02:06. Based on their allele frequency, these epitopes could cover 83.8% of the Japanese individuals. Since no mutation was identified in these epitope sequences we identified, these potential candidate epitopes could lead to the contribution to development of rationally designed epitope-based peptide vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. If these epitopes are immunogenic, we are able to use HLA-oligomer with each of these peptides for monitoring T-cell responses in patients and silently-infected individuals. In addition, several reports have suggested that a subset of patients with severe COVID-19 might have a cytokine release syndrome [19, 20]. These HLA-oligomers might be useful to predict and monitor acute T-cell responses in COVID-19 patients who cause these life-threatning symptoms. In conclusion, through bioinformatic screening, we identified a large number of potential T cell epitopes, some of which could cover other coronavirus spices, including SARS-CoV. These peptides can possibly cover a large proportion of the Japanese population. Although further experimental proof to evaluate immunogenicity of the predicted peptides is required, we hope our findings in the current study could contribute to designing vaccines (DNA or RNA vaccine, inactivated viral vaccines, or peptides vaccines) and evaluating these vaccines, and also to immune monitoring of SARS-CoV2-infected patients. Supplementary Table 1 Supplementary Table 2 Supplementary Table 3 Supplementary Table 4 Supplementary Table 5 Supplementary Table 6 Supplementary Table 7
  20 in total

1.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool.

Authors:  W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Gapped sequence alignment using artificial neural networks: application to the MHC class I system.

Authors:  Massimo Andreatta; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  NetMHCpan-4.0: Improved Peptide-MHC Class I Interaction Predictions Integrating Eluted Ligand and Peptide Binding Affinity Data.

Authors:  Vanessa Jurtz; Sinu Paul; Massimo Andreatta; Paolo Marcatili; Bjoern Peters; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes from subtype C-infected seroconverters in India, with evidence of intersubtype recombination.

Authors:  K S Lole; R C Bollinger; R S Paranjape; D Gadkari; S S Kulkarni; N G Novak; R Ingersoll; H W Sheppard; S C Ray
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Genetic and phenotypic landscape of the major histocompatibilty complex region in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Jun Hirata; Kazuyoshi Hosomichi; Saori Sakaue; Masahiro Kanai; Hirofumi Nakaoka; Kazuyoshi Ishigaki; Ken Suzuki; Masato Akiyama; Toshihiro Kishikawa; Kotaro Ogawa; Tatsuo Masuda; Kenichi Yamamoto; Makoto Hirata; Koichi Matsuda; Yukihide Momozawa; Ituro Inoue; Michiaki Kubo; Yoichiro Kamatani; Yukinori Okada
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Xing-Lou Yang; Xian-Guang Wang; Ben Hu; Lei Zhang; Wei Zhang; Hao-Rui Si; Yan Zhu; Bei Li; Chao-Lin Huang; Hui-Dong Chen; Jing Chen; Yun Luo; Hua Guo; Ren-Di Jiang; Mei-Qin Liu; Ying Chen; Xu-Rui Shen; Xi Wang; Xiao-Shuang Zheng; Kai Zhao; Quan-Jiao Chen; Fei Deng; Lin-Lin Liu; Bing Yan; Fa-Xian Zhan; Yan-Yi Wang; Geng-Fu Xiao; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 69.504

7.  HLA-A*0201 T-cell epitopes in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus nucleocapsid and spike proteins.

Authors:  Yeou-Ping Tsao; Jian-Yu Lin; Jia-Tsrong Jan; Chih-Hsiang Leng; Chen-Chung Chu; Yuh-Cheng Yang; Show-Li Chen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.

Authors:  James M Sanders; Marguerite L Monogue; Tomasz Z Jodlowski; James B Cutrell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression.

Authors:  Puja Mehta; Daniel F McAuley; Michael Brown; Emilie Sanchez; Rachel S Tattersall; Jessica J Manson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Induction of T-cell response by a DNA vaccine encoding a novel HLA-A*0201 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus epitope.

Authors:  Ying-Kit Cheung; Samuel Chak-Sum Cheng; Fion Wan-Yee Sin; Kin-Tak Chan; Yong Xie
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  54 in total

1.  Principles in Immunology for the Design and Development of Vaccines.

Authors:  Claudius U Meyer; Fred Zepp
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Molecular Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Lineages in Armenia.

Authors:  Diana Avetyan; Siras Hakobyan; Maria Nikoghosyan; Lilit Ghukasyan; Gisane Khachatryan; Tamara Sirunyan; Nelli Muradyan; Roksana Zakharyan; Andranik Chavushyan; Varduhi Hayrapetyan; Anahit Hovhannisyan; Shah A Mohamed Bakhash; Keith R Jerome; Pavitra Roychoudhury; Alexander L Greninger; Lyudmila Niazyan; Mher Davidyants; Gayane Melik-Andreasyan; Shushan Sargsyan; Lilit Nersisyan; Arsen Arakelyan
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.818

3.  SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses and correlations with COVID-19 patient predisposition.

Authors:  Arne Sattler; Stefan Angermair; Helena Stockmann; Katrin Moira Heim; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Sascha Treskatsch; Fabian Halleck; Martin E Kreis; Katja Kotsch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Potential Antiviral Immune Response Against COVID-19: Lessons Learned from SARS-CoV.

Authors:  Laleh Sharifi; Amir Reza Safdarian; Pooya Farhangnia; Mahzad Akbarpour; Mahdis Borjkhani; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  SARS-CoV-2 spike L452R variant evades cellular immunity and increases infectivity.

Authors:  Chihiro Motozono; Mako Toyoda; Jiri Zahradnik; Akatsuki Saito; Hesham Nasser; Toong Seng Tan; Isaac Ngare; Izumi Kimura; Keiya Uriu; Yusuke Kosugi; Yuan Yue; Ryo Shimizu; Jumpei Ito; Shiho Torii; Akiko Yonekawa; Nobuyuki Shimono; Yoji Nagasaki; Rumi Minami; Takashi Toya; Noritaka Sekiya; Takasuke Fukuhara; Yoshiharu Matsuura; Gideon Schreiber; Terumasa Ikeda; So Nakagawa; Takamasa Ueno; Kei Sato
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 21.023

Review 6.  Bioinformatic HLA Studies in the Context of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and Review on Association of HLA Alleles with Preexisting Medical Conditions.

Authors:  Mina Mobini Kesheh; Sara Shavandi; Parastoo Hosseini; Rezvan Kakavand-Ghalehnoei; Hossein Keyvani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Investigation of nonsynonymous mutations in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and its interaction with the ACE2 receptor by molecular docking and MM/GBSA approach.

Authors:  Reem Y Aljindan; Abeer M Al-Subaie; Ahoud I Al-Ohali; Thirumal Kumar D; George Priya Doss C; Balu Kamaraj
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 8.  Implementing Personalized Medicine in COVID-19 in Andalusia: An Opportunity to Transform the Healthcare System.

Authors:  Joaquín Dopazo; Douglas Maya-Miles; Federico García; Nicola Lorusso; Miguel Ángel Calleja; María Jesús Pareja; José López-Miranda; Jesús Rodríguez-Baño; Javier Padillo; Isaac Túnez; Manuel Romero-Gómez
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 9.  Structure and Function of Major SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Proteins.

Authors:  Ritesh Gorkhali; Prashanna Koirala; Sadikshya Rijal; Ashmita Mainali; Adesh Baral; Hitesh Kumar Bhattarai
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2021-06-22

10.  Lessons Learned from Cutting-Edge Immunoinformatics on Next-Generation COVID-19 Vaccine Research.

Authors:  Chiranjib Chakraborty; Ashish Ranjan Sharma; Manojit Bhattacharya; Sang-Soo Lee
Journal:  Int J Pept Res Ther       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 1.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.