| Literature DB >> 32372027 |
Josephine Mun-Yee Ko1, Vince Vardhanabhuti2, Wai-Tong Ng3,4, Ka-On Lam1,3, Roger Kai-Cheong Ngan3,5, Dora Lai-Wan Kwong1,3, Victor Ho-Fun Lee1,3, Yun-Hoi Lui6, Chun-Chung Yau3,7, Chung-Kong Kwan5, Wing-Sum Li5, Stephen Yau5, Chen Guo1, Sheyne Sta Ana Choi1, Lisa Chan Lei1, Kenneth Chun-Ho Chan1, Candy Chi-Shan Lam1, Candy King-Chi Chan1, Wei Dai1, Pek-Lan Khong2,3, Maria Li Lung8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an important cancer in Hong Kong. We aim to utilise liquid biopsies for serial monitoring of disseminated NPC in patients to compare with PET-CT imaging in detection of minimal residual disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32372027 PMCID: PMC7341819 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0871-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Demographic and clinical information of 21 patients with disseminated NPC .
| Patient No. | Age | Gender | Stage at initial diagnosis (TNM) | Distant metastasis site | PFS (Months) | Recurrence | Treatment outcome (PET3) | Survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57 | M | IVC (T3N3bM1) | Bone, LNs | 4 | Yes | SMD | |
| 2 | 57 | M | IVC (T3N3M1) | Bone | 5 | Yes | SMD | |
| 3 | 70 | M | III (T3N2M0) | Distant LNs | 5 | Yes | PMD | Dead |
| 4 | 37 | M | III (T3N2M0) | Bone, pleural, liver, LN | 5 | Yes | PMD | Dead |
| 5 | 57 | M | IVC (T1N3bM1) | Bone, liver, LNs | 5 | Yes | PMD | Dead |
| 6 | 62 | M | IVA (T4N2M0) | Liver, LN | 5 | Yes | PMD | |
| 7 | 38 | M | IVB (T2N3bM0) | Bone, LN | 6 | Yes | PMD | Dead |
| 8 | 51 | M | III (T3N1M0) | Bone, lung, LN | 4 | Yes | PMD | Dead |
| 9 | 45 | M | IVC (T3N3M1) | Bone, liver, LN | 5 | Yes | PMD | |
| 10 | 59 | F | IVC (T4N0M1) | Bone, liver | 11 PD | Yes | PMR | |
| 11 | 53 | M | IVC (T4N3M1) | Bone, presacral nodule | 12 PD | Yes | PMR | |
| 12 | 69 | M | IVA (T4N1M0) | Lung | 25 | No | PMR | Dead |
| 13 | 52 | M | III (T3N1M0) | Lung, LN | 15 In remission | No | PMR | |
| 14 | 38 | M | III (T3N1M0) | Bone, liver, lung | 10 PD | Yes | CMR | |
| 15 | 64 | F | IVC (T1N2M1) | Liver | 24 PD | Yes | CMR | |
| 16 | 59 | M | IVC (T3N3bM1) | Liver, lung | 8 PD | Yes | CMR | Dead |
| 17 | 50 | M | IVC (T3N2M1) | Liver | 9 PD | Yes | CMR | |
| 18 | 62 | M | IVC (T3N3M1) | Lung | 28 in remission | No | CMR | |
| 19 | 41 | F | III (T3N1M0) | Lung, LN | 17 in remission | No | CMR | |
| 20 | 63 | F | III (T1N2M0) | Bone, lung | 30 in remission | No | CMR | |
| 21 | 13 | F | IVC (T4N3M1) | Bone, liver | 18 in remission | No | CMR |
Fig. 1Circulating tumor cell detection by immunofluorescence staining and in spike-in experiments.
a A representative immunofluorescence (IF) staining image of NPC CTCs after enrichment. b the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and the false discovery rate (FDR) of cell line spike-in experiments with KYSE270 and blood from a healthy individual (RC2202) at concentrations of 100%, 10%, 5%, 2.5% and 1.25% of the DNA content (All mutations detected by Mutect 1).
Serial analysis results of CTC counts, blood mutation load (BML), plasma EBV and imaging for 21 metastatic NPC patients.
| Patients | # CTC samples | CTC | EBV (copies/ml) | Imaging | CTC count | # mutations | BML (#/Mb)a | PFS (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 7838542 | PET1 | 1 | – | – | |
| 3 | 102813 | PET2: PMR | 4 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 172708 | PET3: SMD | 11 | – | – | |||
| 1 | 24958 | PET1 | NA | – | – | |||
| 2 | 4 | 2 | 386 | 0 | – | – | ||
| 3 | 452 | PET2:PMR | NA | – | – | |||
| 4 | 428 | PET3:SMD | 2 | 25 | 3.6 | |||
| 3 | 4 | 1 | 173958 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |
| 2 | 86094 | 0 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 41615 | PET2: SMD | 1 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 15896 | PET3: PMD | 2 | 66 | 9.4 | |||
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 10895471 | PET1 | 2 | – | – | |
| 2 | 1191406 | 7 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 33203125 | PET2: PMR | 2 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 27791667 | PET3: PMD | 4 | 3 | 0.4 | |||
| 5 | 4 | 1 | 394636 | PET1 | 3 | – | – | |
| 2 | 3268 | 18 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 3825 | PET2: PMR | 2 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 3922 | PET3: PMD | 2 | 113 | 16.1 | |||
| 6 | 4 | 1 | 7109375 | PET1 | 5 | – | – | |
| 2 | 156458 | 2 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 385417 | PET2: PMR | 1 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 367083 | PET3: PMD | 2 | 25 | 3.6 | |||
| 7 | 4 | 1 | 34740 | PET1 | 1 | – | – | |
| 2 | 41 | 0 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 102 | PET2: PMR | 0 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 2271 | PET3: PMD | 1 | 100 | 14.3 | |||
| 8 | 4 | 1 | 504167 | PET1 | 8 | – | – | |
| 2 | 1103 | 5 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 654 | PET2: PMR | 4 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 2217 | PET3: PMD | 0 | 129 | 18.4 | |||
| 1 | 52792 | PET1 | 3 | – | – | |||
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 4879 | 4 | – | – | ||
| 3 | 812 | PET2:PMR | 8 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 1121 | PET3:PMD | 18 | 38 | 5.4 | |||
| 10 | 4 | 1 | 42396 | PET1 | 3 | – | – | |
| 2 | 0 | 1 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 27 | PET2: PMR | 0 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 0 | PET3: PMR | 2 | (a) 222 | 31.7 | |||
| (b) 267 | 38.1 | |||||||
| 11 | 4 | 1 | 75542 | PET1 | 5 | – | – | |
| 2 | 109 | 8 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 19 | PET2: PMR | 2 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 2329 | PET3: PMR | 4 | 46 | 6.6 | |||
| 12 | 4 | 1 | 1204 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 0 | PET2: PMR | 0 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 0 | PET3: PMR | 0 | 21 | 3 | Yes (25) | ||
| 1 | 94 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |||
| 13 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 5 | – | – | ||
| 3 | 0 | PET2:SMD | 8 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 0 | PET3:PMR | 5 | – | – | No (15) | ||
| 14 | 5 | 1 | 341146 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |
| 2 | 50 | 1 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 166 | PET2: PMR | 0 | 113 | 16.1 | |||
| 4 | 7 | PET3: CMR | 2 | 75 | 10.7 | |||
| 5 | 963 | 1 | 78 | 11.1 | ||||
| (b) 46 | 6.6 | |||||||
| 15 | 4 | 1 | 123958 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |
| 2 | 86 | 0 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 0 | PET2: PMR | 1 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 0 | PET3: CMR | 1 | 3 | 0.4 | |||
| 16 | 4 | 1 | 399583 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |
| 2 | 288 | 0 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 648 | PET2: PMR | – | – | – | |||
| 4 | 119 | PET3: CMR | 4 | – | – | |||
| 17 | 4 | 1 | 20427 | PET1 | 2 | – | – | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 0 | PET2: CMR | 0 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 53 | PET3: CMR | 0 | 40 | 5.7 | |||
| 18 | 4 | 1 | 40818 | PET1 | 2 | – | – | |
| 2 | 93 | 0 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 11 | PET2: CMR | 0 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 0 | PET3: CMR | 0 | 2 | 0.3 | No (28) | ||
| 19 | 4 | 1 | 899 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |
| 2 | 0 | 4 | – | – | ||||
| 3 | 0 | PET2: CMR | 0 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 0 | PET3: CMR | 0 | 160 | 22.9 | No (17) | ||
| 1 | 165 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |||
| 20 | 3 | 2 | 666 | 0 | – | – | ||
| 3 | – | PET2:CMR | – | – | – | No (30) | ||
| 4 | 35 | PET3:CMR | 0 | – | – | |||
| 1 | 230417 | PET1 | 0 | – | – | |||
| 21 | 4 | 2 | 217 | 0 | – | – | ||
| 3 | 0 | PET2:CMR | 1 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 4 | PET3:CMR | 2 | – | – | No (18) |
PET1, PET2 and PET3 refer to the baseline, middle (before 3rd cycle) and end of treatment, respectively. The high purity runs for CTC enrichment of patients 1, 13, 16, 20 and 21, were not applicable for NGS analysis. Sufficient blood samples were available for duplicate BML analysis for patients 10 and 14.
aBML > 0.57 is defined as positive (four mutations were set as the cut-off in 7 Mb capture regions in the cell line spike-in experiment).
Patient died were shown as bold values in the table.
Fig. 2Representative longitudinal liquid biopsy monitoring and imaging for NPC patients having different treatment outcomes.
a PET-CT imaging of NPC patient 5 showed partial metabolic response (PMR) in the middle and progressive metabolic disease (PMD) at the end of treatment. Serial liquid biopsy monitoring by plasma EBV1-4, CTC1-4 enumeration and CTC4 blood mutation load (16.1 mutations/Mb) all remained positive during treatment. b CTC serial monitoring findings of NPC patient 10 showed concordant results of disease burden compared to the PMR result of radiologic imaging in contrast to the negative mid- and post-treatment plasma EBV results. CTC2 and CTC4 enumeration data remained positive during and at the end of treatment and the CTC NGS assay detected 31.7 mutations/Mb in CTC4. c Radiologic imaging for NPC patient 14 showed complete metabolic response (CMR), but the CTC4 enumeration detected positive CTC counts and NGS analysis, with a high blood mutation load (6.6 mutations/Mb), providing a lead time of 5 months prior to imaging showing minimal residual disease; in contrast the EBV4 results only showed 7 EBV copies/ml. d The minimal residual disease of NPC patient 17, with CMR and ambiguous EBV findings, indicated by both the EBV4 plasma assay (53 copies/ml) and blood mutation load of CTC4 (5.7 mutations/Mb).
Fig. 3Sensitivity and specificity of longitudinal CTC and EBV DNA assays in mNPC.
a Summary of AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of CTCs and EBV DNA load for PFS in mNPC. b ROC analysis to test the specificity and sensitivity of CTC4, EBV4, combined CTC4/EBV4 and CTC4/EBV4/BML for PFS in mNPC patients with favourable response.
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) with EBV status, CTC enumeration and blood mutation load (BML) in serial and longitudinal analyses.
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of association of PFS with a serial EBV status (i–iv) and longitudinal change of EBV status (v–vii) at baseline, during and end of CT, and b serial CTC count status (i–iv), post-CT blood mutation load (BML) (v), longitudinal change of CTC status (vi–vii) at baseline, during and end of CT, and combined CTC4/EBV4 (viii).