Literature DB >> 32371794

Home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children, adolescents and young adults: comparison, diagnostic agreement and association with preclinical organ damage.

Maria Elena Zeniodi1, Angeliki Ntineri1, Anastasios Kollias1, George Servos2, Ioannis Moyssakis3, Antonios Destounis1, Angelos Harokopakis4, Andriani Vazeou5, George S Stergiou1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the association of home (HBP), ambulatory (ABP) and office blood pressure (OBP) measurements with preclinical organ damage in young individuals.
METHODS: Individuals referred for elevated blood pressure and healthy volunteers aged 6-25 years were evaluated with OBP (2-3 visits), 7-day HBP and 24-h ABP monitoring. Organ damage was assessed by echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI), carotid ultrasonography [intima--media thickness (IMT)] and pulse wave velocity (PWV) using piezo-electronic or oscillometric technique.
RESULTS: Analysis included 251 individuals (mean age 14 ± 3.9 years, 70.9% men: 31.1% children, 54.6% adolescents, 14.3% young adults) of whom 189 had LVMI, 123 IMT and 198 PWV measurements. Office, ambulatory and home hypertension was diagnosed in 29.5, 27.1 and 26.3% of participants. The agreement of OBP with ABP was 74.5% (kappa 0.37) and HBP 76.1% (kappa 0.41), with closer agreement between HBP and ABP (84.9%, kappa 0.61). LVMI gave comparable correlations with systolic OBP, 24-h ABP and HBP (r = 0.31/0.31/0.30, all P < 0.01). The same was the case for IMT (0.33/0.32/0.37, all P < 0.01) and piezo-electronic PWV (0.55/0.53/0.52, all P < 0.01), whereas oscillometric PWV gave stronger correlations with OBP than ABP or HBP. In linear regression analysis, the variation of LVMI was determined by night-time ABP, of IMT by HBP and of PWV by OBP and 24-h ABP.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that in young individuals, target organ damage is mainly determined by out-of-office rather than office BP. Home and ambulatory BP give comparable associations with preclinical organ damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32371794     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  2 in total

Review 1.  Blood Pressure in Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Shakia T Hardy; Elaine M Urbina
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.080

2.  Consistency among Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Values in Women with Chronic Hypertension and History of Eclampsia or Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Ewa Wojciechowska; Piotr Sobieraj; Maciej Siński; Maria Anna Zaborska-Dworak; Piotr Gryglas; Jacek Lewandowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.