Literature DB >> 32371247

Perinatal mortality audits and reviews: Past, present and the way forward.

Aenne Helps1, Sara Leitao2, Richard Greene3, Keelin O'Donoghue4.   

Abstract

Perinatal deaths are devastating for families and staff involved. Failure to examine perinatal deaths for substandard care prevents learning and may lead to recurrence of events, as well as prolonged morbidity in bereaved families and hospital staff. Perinatal mortality reviews can identify factors contributing to suboptimal care. An integrative literature review was carried out to study the different types of perinatal mortality reviews currently being done internationally, establishing a comparison and examining promising new developments. We start by outlining issues with the classification of perinatal deaths and the different types of perinatal mortality reviews carried out in high-income countries. We reflect on the challenges that are encountered in the current processes and we then comment on how these may be overcome. Current literature shows that differences in classifications of perinatal deaths continue to impede important international comparisons. National perinatal mortality audits can provide reliable high-quality data to facilitate national and international benchmarking. Confidential enquiries give expert assessment on anonymised information to initiate system-wide improvements, but to provide local information on perinatal deaths unit-based multi-disciplinary team reviews are required. Additionally, there is a need to shift from a blame-culture to a focus on achieving best practice by learning from mistakes. Review tools and processes have been implemented in some countries to standardize perinatal mortality reviews, but there is still more work to be done. Involving the bereaved parents in the perinatal mortality review process is important and ways to achieve this are progressing. A structured approach to the perinatal mortality review process should be developed to facilitate sharing of experiences and challenges at national (or international) level. To achieve a reduction in the number of stillbirths and neonatal deaths, it is crucial to ensure that the perinatal mortality audit and review cycle is completed with implementation and re-evaluation of recommended changes in maternity services.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audit; Bereaved parents’ involvement; Confidential enquiry; Multidisciplinary team; Perinatal mortality review; Stillbirth classification

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32371247     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  3 in total

1.  Walk the Talk: The Transforming Journey of Facility-Based Death Review Committee from Stillbirths to Neonates.

Authors:  Yousef S Khader; Nihaya A Al-Sheyab; Khulood K Shattnawi; Mohammad S Alyahya; Anwar Batieha
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Barriers to attendance at a tertiary hospital's perinatal mortality meeting.

Authors:  Barbara Burke; Sophie Boyd; Karen McNamara; Keelin O'Donoghue
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Effect of a model based on education and teleassistance for the management of obstetric emergencies in 10 rural populations from Colombia.

Authors:  María Fernanda Escobar; María Paula Echavarria; Juan Carlos Gallego; Natalia Riascos; Hilda Vasquez; Daniela Nasner; Stephanie Pabon; Zindy Alexandra Castro; Didier Augusto Cardona; Ana Milena Castro; Isabella Ramos; María Antonia Hincapie; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Diana Marcela Martínez-Ruíz; Javier Andrés Carvajal
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-10-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.