Literature DB >> 32371116

Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial.

Alessandro Repici1, Matteo Badalamenti2, Roberta Maselli2, Loredana Correale2, Franco Radaelli3, Emanuele Rondonotti3, Elisa Ferrara2, Marco Spadaccini2, Asma Alkandari4, Alessandro Fugazza2, Andrea Anderloni2, Piera Alessia Galtieri2, Gaia Pellegatta2, Silvia Carrara2, Milena Di Leo2, Vincenzo Craviotto2, Laura Lamonaca2, Roberto Lorenzetti5, Alida Andrealli3, Giulio Antonelli5, Michael Wallace6, Prateek Sharma7, Thomas Rosch8, Cesare Hassan5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: One-fourth of colorectal neoplasias are missed during screening colonoscopies; these can develop into colorectal cancer (CRC). Deep learning systems allow for real-time computer-aided detection (CADe) of polyps with high accuracy. We performed a multicenter, randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of a CADe system in detection of colorectal neoplasias during real-time colonoscopy.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 685 subjects (61.32 ± 10.2 years old; 337 men) undergoing screening colonoscopies for CRC, post-polypectomy surveillance, or workup due to positive results from a fecal immunochemical test or signs or symptoms of CRC, at 3 centers in Italy from September through November 2019. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups who underwent high-definition colonoscopies with the CADe system or without (controls). The CADe system included an artificial intelligence-based medical device (GI-Genius, Medtronic) trained to process colonoscopy images and superimpose them, in real time, on the endoscopy display a green box over suspected lesions. A minimum withdrawal time of 6 minutes was required. Lesions were collected and histopathology findings were used as the reference standard. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR, the percentage of patients with at least 1 histologically proven adenoma or carcinoma). Secondary outcomes were adenomas detected per colonoscopy, non-neoplastic resection rate, and withdrawal time.
RESULTS: The ADR was significantly higher in the CADe group (54.8%) than in the control group (40.4%) (relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.45). Adenomas detected per colonoscopy were significantly higher in the CADe group (mean, 1.07 ±1.54) than in the control group (mean 0.71 ± 1.20) (incidence rate ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.15-1.86). Adenomas 5 mm or smaller were detected in a significantly higher proportion of subjects in the CADe group (33.7%) than in the control group (26.5%; RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52), as were adenomas of 6 to 9 mm (detected in 10.6% of subjects in the CADe group vs 5.8% in the control group; RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.09-2.86), regardless of morphology or location. There was no significant difference between groups in withdrawal time (417 ± 101 seconds for the CADe group vs 435 ± 149 for controls; P = .1) or proportion of subjects with resection of non-neoplastic lesions (26.0% in the CADe group vs 28.7% of controls; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.90-1.12).
CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter, randomized trial, we found that including CADe in real-time colonoscopy significantly increases ADR and adenomas detected per colonoscopy without increasing withdrawal time. ClinicalTrials.gov no: 04079478.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma Per Colonoscopy; Artificial Intelligence; Comparison; Early Detection

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32371116     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  64 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence for Disease Assessment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: How Will it Change Our Practice?

Authors:  Ryan W Stidham; Kento Takenaka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Alexander Meining
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 3.  Current status and limitations of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Joel Troya; Daniel Fitting
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Artificial intelligence and high-resolution anoscopy: automatic identification of anal squamous cell carcinoma precursors using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  M M Saraiva; L Spindler; N Fathallah; H Beaussier; C Mamma; M Quesnée; T Ribeiro; J Afonso; M Carvalho; R Moura; P Andrade; H Cardoso; J Adam; J Ferreira; G Macedo; V de Parades
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 5.  Preparation of image databases for artificial intelligence algorithm development in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Chang Bong Yang; Sang Hoon Kim; Yun Jeong Lim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  MiWEndo: Evaluation of a Microwave Colonoscopy Algorithm for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection in Ex Vivo Human Colon Models.

Authors:  Marta Guardiola; Walid Dghoughi; Roberto Sont; Alejandra Garrido; Sergi Marcoval; Luz María Neira; Ignasi Belda; Glòria Fernández-Esparrach
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Polyp Detection in Colonoscopy: Where Have We Been, Where Do We Stand, and Where Are We Headed?

Authors:  Thomas Wittenberg; Martin Raithel
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-11-12

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Yutaka Okagawa; Seiichiro Abe; Masayoshi Yamada; Ichiro Oda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence for the detection of polyps or cancer with colon capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander R Robertson; Santi Segui; Hagen Wenzek; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-06-13

10.  The role of AI technology in prediction, diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chaoran Yu; Ernest Johann Helwig
Journal:  Artif Intell Rev       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 8.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.