Literature DB >> 32370976

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Omar Zurkiya1, Suvranu Ganguli2, Sanjeeva P Kalva3, Jonathan H Chung4, Lubdha M Shah5, Bill S Majdalany6, Julie Bykowski7, Brett W Carter8, Ankur Chandra9, Jeremy D Collins10, Andrew J Gunn11, A Tuba Kendi10, Minhajuddin S Khaja12, David S Liebeskind13, Fabien Maldonado14, Piotr Obara15, Patrick D Sutphin16, Betty C Tong17, Kanupriya Vijay16, Amanda S Corey18, Jeffrey P Kanne19, Karin E Dill20.   

Abstract

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is the clinical entity that occurs with compression of the brachial plexus, subclavian artery, and/or subclavian vein at the superior thoracic outlet. Compression of each of these structures results in characteristic symptoms divided into three variants: neurogenic TOS, venous TOS, and arterial TOS, each arising from the specific structure that is compressed. The constellation of symptoms in each patient may vary, and patients may have more than one symptom simultaneously. Understanding the various anatomic spaces, causes of narrowing, and resulting neurovascular changes is important in choosing and interpreting radiological imaging performed to help diagnose TOS and plan for intervention. This publication has separated imaging appropriateness based on neurogenic, venous, or arterial symptoms, acknowledging that some patients may present with combined symptoms that may require more than one study to fully resolve. Additionally, in the postoperative setting, new symptoms may arise altering the need for specific imaging as compared to preoperative evaluation. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome; Paget-Schroetter disease; Thoracic outlet syndrome; Venous thoracic outlet syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32370976     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  2 in total

Review 1.  Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Part I: Systematic Review of the Literature and Consensus on Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Classification of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies' Section of Peripheral Nerve Surgery.

Authors:  Nora Franziska Dengler; Stefano Ferraresi; Shimon Rochkind; Natalia Denisova; Debora Garozzo; Christian Heinen; Ridvan Alimehmeti; Crescenzo Capone; Damiano Giuseppe Barone; Anna Zdunczyk; Maria Teresa Pedro; Gregor Antoniadis; Radek Kaiser; Annie Dubuisson; Thomas Kretschmer; Lukas Rasulic
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Single Center Experience on Robotic Assisted First Rib Resection and Literature Review.

Authors:  Andreas Gkikas; Savvas Lampridis; Davide Patrini; Peter B Kestenholz; Luis Filipe Azenha; Gregor Jan Kocher; Marco Scarci; Fabrizio Minervini
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.