Literature DB >> 32370957

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Head Trauma-Child.

Maura E Ryan1, Sumit Pruthi2, Nilesh K Desai3, Richard A Falcone4, Orit A Glenn5, Madeline M Joseph6, Mohit Maheshwari7, Jennifer R Marin8, Catherine Mazzola9, Sarah S Milla10, David M Mirsky11, John S Myseros12, Sumit N Niogi13, Sonia Partap14, Rupa Radhakrishnan15, Richard L Robertson16, Bruno P Soares17, Unni K Udayasankar18, Matthew T Whitehead19, Jason N Wright20, Boaz Karmazyn21.   

Abstract

Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. The majority of accidental pediatric head trauma is minor and sustained without intracranial injury. Well-validated pediatric-specific clinical decision guidelines should be used to identify very low-risk children who can safely forgo imaging. In those who require acute imaging, CT is considered the first-line imaging modality for suspected intracranial injury because of the short duration of the examination and its high sensitivity for acute hemorrhage. MRI can accurately detect traumatic complications, but often necessitates sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment. There is a paucity of literature regarding vascular injuries in pediatric blunt head trauma and imaging is typically guided by clinical suspicion. Advanced imaging techniques have the potential to identify changes that are not seen by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; CT; Head trauma; MRI; Pediatric

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32370957     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pitfalls in the interpretation of pediatric head CTs: what the emergency radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Hannah Hodges; Katherine N Epstein; Michele Retrouvey; Sherry S Wang; Allyson A Richards; Dustin Lima; Jonathan W Revels
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2022-04-08

2.  Nearly Missed Pharyngeal Foreign Body: A Three-Year-Old van Gogh.

Authors:  Philippe Haroun; Paolo Simoni; Anne-Laure Mansbach; Grammatina Boitsios
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Artificial intelligence for radiological paediatric fracture assessment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; Richard D White; Hantao Liu; Owen J Arthurs; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnosis of Pediatric Skull Fractures on Plain Radiographs.

Authors:  Jae Won Choi; Yeon Jin Cho; Ji Young Ha; Yun Young Lee; Seok Young Koh; June Young Seo; Young Hun Choi; Jung-Eun Cheon; Ji Hoon Phi; Injoon Kim; Jaekwang Yang; Woo Sun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.