Literature DB >> 32370931

Financial incentives promote engagement in employment services for unemployed adults in treatment for opioid use disorder.

August F Holtyn1, Forrest Toegel2, Shrinidhi Subramaniam2, Meghan Arellano2, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos2, Michael Fingerhood2, Kenneth Silverman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Promoting employment among unemployed adults with substance use disorder is a difficult challenge for which existing interventions have had limited effects. This study examined whether financial incentives could increase engagement in employment services for unemployed adults in treatment for opioid use disorder.
METHODS: The study was conducted from 2014 to 2019 in Baltimore, MD. After a 3-month abstinence initiation and training period, participants (N = 91) were randomly assigned to a Control group or an Incentive group and were invited to work with an employment specialist to seek employment in a community job for 12 months. Participants assigned to the Control group (n = 47) did not receive incentives for working with the employment specialist. Participants assigned to the Incentive group (n = 44) could earn financial incentives for working with the employment specialist, but had to provide opiate- and cocaine-negative urine samples to maximize pay.
RESULTS: Incentive participants attended the employment services and worked with the employment specialist on significantly more days than Control participants (41.8 % versus 1.1 % of days; OR = 40.42, 95 % CI = 32.46-48.38, p < .001), and for significantly more hours than Control participants (3.58 versus 1.25 h, on average; OR=2.34, 95 % CI=1.83-2.85, p < .001). Incentive participants were more likely to be retained than Control participants when analyses were based solely on attendance (HR=0.12, 95 % CI=0.06-0.25, p < .001) and attendance and employment combined (HR=0.15, 95 % CI=0.07-0.31, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives were effective in promoting engagement in employment services for individuals who often do not utilize employment services.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cocaine; Employment; Financial incentives; Job seeking; Opioids; Therapeutic workplace

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32370931      PMCID: PMC7293927          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  18 in total

1.  Exploring the limits and utility of operant conditioning in the treatment of drug addiction.

Authors:  Kenneth Silverman
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  The effectiveness of vocational services for substance users in treatment.

Authors:  Stephen Magura; Graham L Staines; Laura Blankertz; Elizabeth M Madison
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  Performance pay improves engagement, progress, and satisfaction in computer-based job skills training of low-income adults.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Anthony DeFulio; Sigurdur O Sigurdsson; Kenneth Silverman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2013

Review 5.  Behavior analysts in the war on poverty: Developing an operant antipoverty program.

Authors:  Kenneth Silverman; August F Holtyn; Shrinidhi Subramaniam
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang; P S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Randomized multi-site trial of the Job Seekers' Workshop in patients with substance use disorders.

Authors:  Dace S Svikis; Lori Keyser-Marcus; Maxine Stitzer; Traci Rieckmann; Lauretta Safford; Peter Loeb; Tim Allen; Carol Luna-Anderson; Sudie E Back; Judith Cohen; Michael A DeBernardi; Bruce Dillard; Alyssa Forcehimes; William Jaffee; Therese Killeen; Ken Kolodner; Michael Levy; Diane Pallas; Harold I Perl; Jennifer Sharpe Potter; Scott Provost; Karen Reese; Royce R Sampson; Allison Sepulveda; Ned Snead; Conrad J Wong; Joan Zweben
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Evaluation of a modified contingency management intervention for consistent attendance in therapeutic workplace participants.

Authors:  Conrad J Wong; Erin M Dillon; Christine Sylvest; Kenneth Silverman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Susan E Assmann; Laura E Enos; Linda E Kasten
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Is employment-focused case management effective for patients with substance use disorders? Results from a controlled multi-site trial in Germany covering a 2-years-period after inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  Susanne Saal; Lukas Forschner; Dietmar Kemmann; Jacqueline Zlatosch; Thomas W Kallert
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.630

View more
  2 in total

1.  Abstinence-contingent wage supplements to promote drug abstinence and employment: Post-intervention outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew D Novak; August F Holtyn; Forrest Toegel; Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos; Kenneth Silverman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Misalignment of Stakeholder Incentives in the Opioid Crisis.

Authors:  Alireza Boloori; Bengt B Arnetz; Frederi Viens; Taps Maiti; Judith E Arnetz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.