Thinzar M Lwin1, Sophie Hernot2, Hannah Hollandsworth3, Siamak Amirfakhri3, Filemoni Filemoni3, Pieterjan Debie2, Robert M Hoffman4, Michael Bouvet5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA. 2. Laboratory for In vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging, ICMI-BEFY/MIMA, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA. 4. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA; AntiCancer, Inc, San Diego, CA. 5. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, CA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, CA. Electronic address: mbouvet@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nanobodies, derived from camelid antibodies made of only heavy chains, are the smallest, biologic, antigen-binding fragments (~15kDa) with faster pharmacokinetics and better tumor penetration efficiency than standard antibodies. The present study evaluates the efficacy of a fluorescent, anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) nanobody for rapid tumor labeling in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Anti-CEA or control nanobodies were conjugated with the near-infrared fluorophore IRDye 800CW. Fragments of BxPC-3 (high-CEA expressing) or MiaPACA-2 (low-CEA expressing) human pancreatic cancer cell lines were orthotopically implanted into the pancreatic tail of nude mice. After tumors reached 7 to 10 mm in size, 2 nmol anti-CEA or control nanobody-IRDye800CW were injected intravenously. Mice were imaged at various time points hours post-injection. RESULTS: Anti-CEA nanobodies clearly labeled BxPC3 orthotopic pancreatic tumors 3 hours after injection. The signal was present as early as 15 minutes after injection and was robust at 1 to 3 hours after injection with a tumor-to-background ratio of 2.66. In contrast, there was very low accumulation in the low CEA-expressing, MiaPACA2 pancreatic orthotopic tumors. The fluorophore-conjugated nanobody was specific for CEA-expressing tumors, while the control nanobody did not show any tumor-specific signal. Both nanobodies had strong kidney uptake as expected for small-molecule probes. The fluorescence signal was detectable using 2 clinical, Food and Drug Administration-approved, 800 nm imaging devices as well as small animal imaging systems. CONCLUSION: This anti-CEA, nanobody-based, fluorescent probe labeled pancreatic orthotopic tumors within 15 minutes of intravenous injection. Fluorescent anti-CEA nanobodies have labeling kinetics that approach the speed of nonspecific dyes such as indocyanine green but with the specificity of antibodies. The use of fluorescently-labeled, intact antibodies leads to a labeling delay of 48 to 96 hours between probe administration and the necessarily delayed time of operation, which can be avoided with nanobodies. The kinetics of a nanobody-based probe makes it a practical agent for same-day, patient administration and fluorescence-guided surgery.
BACKGROUND: Nanobodies, derived from camelid antibodies made of only heavy chains, are the smallest, biologic, antigen-binding fragments (~15kDa) with faster pharmacokinetics and better tumor penetration efficiency than standard antibodies. The present study evaluates the efficacy of a fluorescent, anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) nanobody for rapid tumor labeling in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Anti-CEA or control nanobodies were conjugated with the near-infrared fluorophore IRDye 800CW. Fragments of BxPC-3 (high-CEA expressing) or MiaPACA-2 (low-CEA expressing) humanpancreatic cancer cell lines were orthotopically implanted into the pancreatic tail of nude mice. After tumors reached 7 to 10 mm in size, 2 nmol anti-CEA or control nanobody-IRDye800CW were injected intravenously. Mice were imaged at various time points hours post-injection. RESULTS: Anti-CEA nanobodies clearly labeled BxPC3 orthotopic pancreatic tumors 3 hours after injection. The signal was present as early as 15 minutes after injection and was robust at 1 to 3 hours after injection with a tumor-to-background ratio of 2.66. In contrast, there was very low accumulation in the low CEA-expressing, MiaPACA2 pancreatic orthotopic tumors. The fluorophore-conjugated nanobody was specific for CEA-expressing tumors, while the control nanobody did not show any tumor-specific signal. Both nanobodies had strong kidney uptake as expected for small-molecule probes. The fluorescence signal was detectable using 2 clinical, Food and Drug Administration-approved, 800 nm imaging devices as well as small animal imaging systems. CONCLUSION: This anti-CEA, nanobody-based, fluorescent probe labeled pancreatic orthotopic tumors within 15 minutes of intravenous injection. Fluorescent anti-CEA nanobodies have labeling kinetics that approach the speed of nonspecific dyes such as indocyanine green but with the specificity of antibodies. The use of fluorescently-labeled, intact antibodies leads to a labeling delay of 48 to 96 hours between probe administration and the necessarily delayed time of operation, which can be avoided with nanobodies. The kinetics of a nanobody-based probe makes it a practical agent for same-day, patient administration and fluorescence-guided surgery.
Authors: M Lemaire; M D'Huyvetter; T Lahoutte; E Van Valckenborgh; E Menu; E De Bruyne; P Kronenberger; U Wernery; S Muyldermans; N Devoogdt; K Vanderkerken Journal: Leukemia Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Hop S Tran Cao; Sharmeela Kaushal; Cristina A Metildi; Rhiana S Menen; Claudia Lee; Cynthia S Snyder; Karen Messer; Minya Pu; George A Luiken; Mark A Talamini; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2012-09
Authors: Timothy M Pawlik; Charles R Scoggins; Daria Zorzi; Eddie K Abdalla; Axel Andres; Cathy Eng; Steven A Curley; Evelyne M Loyer; Andrea Muratore; Gilles Mentha; Lorenzo Capussotti; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Willemieke S Tummers; Sarah E Miller; Nutte T Teraphongphom; Adam Gomez; Idan Steinberg; David M Huland; Steve Hong; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli; Alifia Hasan; Robert Ertsey; Bert A Bonsing; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Teri A Longacre; George A Fisher; Sanjiv S Gambhir; George A Poultsides; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Thomas Schnelldorfer; Andrew I Gagnon; Richard T Birkett; Gail Reynolds; Kristen M Murphy; Roger L Jenkins Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Michele McElroy; Sharmeela Kaushal; George A Luiken; Mark A Talamini; A R Moossa; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: World J Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Thinzar M Lwin; Michael A Turner; Hiroto Nishino; Siamak Amirfakhri; Sophie Hernot; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: Thinzar M Lwin; Michael A Turner; Siamak Amirfakhri; Hiroto Nishino; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 6.600