Literature DB >> 32370617

Usefulness of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Aortic Stenosis.

Yohann Bohbot1,2, Cédric Renard3, Alain Manrique4, Franck Levy5, Sylvestre Maréchaux2,6, Bernhard L Gerber7,8, Christophe Tribouilloy1,2.   

Abstract

The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in aortic stenosis (AS). Although CMR is undeniably the gold standard for assessing left ventricular volume, mass, and function, the assessment of the left ventricular repercussions of AS by CMR is not routinely performed in clinical practice, and its role in evaluating and quantifying AS is not yet well established. CMR is an imaging modality integrating myocardial function and disease, which could be particularly useful in a pathology like AS that should be considered as a global myocardial disease rather than an isolated valve disease. In this review, we discuss the emerging potential of CMR for the diagnosis and prognosis of AS. We detail its utility for studying all aspects of AS, including valve anatomy, flow quantification, left ventricular volumes, mass, remodeling, and function, tissue mapping, and 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging. We also discuss different clinical situations where CMR could be useful in AS, for example, in low-flow low-gradient AS to confirm the low-flow state and to understand the reason for the left ventricular dysfunction or when there is a suspicion of associated cardiac amyloidosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve stenosis; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; myocardium; prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32370617     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  9 in total

Review 1.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2021 cases of SCMR and COVID-19 case collection series.

Authors:  Jason N Johnson; Daniel B Loriaux; Elizabeth Jenista; Han W Kim; Anna Baritussio; Estefania De Garate Iparraguirre; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Vanessa Denny; Brian O'Connor; Saira Siddiqui; Kana Fujikura; Charles W Benton; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jonathan Kochav; Jiwon Kim; Chaitanya Madamanchi; Michael Steigner; Raymond Kwong; Diego Chango-Azanza; Mónica Chapa; Sandra Rosales-Uvera; Puja Sitwala; Peter Filev; Anurag Sahu; Jason Craft; George J Punnakudiyil; Viraj Jayam; Farah Shams; Sean G Hughes; Jonan C Y Lee; Edward A Hulten; Kevin E Steel; Sylvia S M Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.903

2.  ANMCO position paper: 2022 focused update of appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging: aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Federico Nardi; Paolo Giuseppe Pino; Leonardo De Luca; Carmine Riccio; Manlio Cipriani; Marco Corda; Giuseppina Maura Francese; Domenico Gabrielli; Fabrizio Oliva; Michele Massimo Gulizia; Furio Colivicchi
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.624

3.  A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Felix Troger; Ivan Lechner; Martin Reindl; Christina Tiller; Magdalena Holzknecht; Mathias Pamminger; Christian Kremser; Johannes Schwaiger; Sebastian J Reinstadler; Axel Bauer; Bernhard Metzler; Agnes Mayr; Gert Klug
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Peak flow measurements in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a prospective comparative study between cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2D and 4D flow and transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Satu M Vaara; Juha I Peltonen; Jyri Lommi; Satu Suihko; Helena Rajala; Minna Kylmälä; Reetta Hälvä; Touko T Kaasalainen; Miia Holmström; Sari Kivistö; Suvi Syväranta
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Aliased Flow Signal Planimetry by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Cesare Mantini; Mohammed Y Khanji; Emilia D'Ugo; Marzia Olivieri; Cristiano Giovanni Caputi; Gabriella Bufano; Domenico Mastrodicasa; Darien Calvo Garcia; Domenico Rotondo; Matteo Candeloro; Claudio Tana; Filippo Cademartiri; Adrian Ionescu; Massimo Caulo; Sabina Gallina; Fabrizio Ricci
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-10-18

6.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of rheumatic mitral stenosis: findings from three worldwide endemic zones.

Authors:  Mahesh K Vidula; Ziqian Xu; Yuanwei Xu; Abdullah Alturki; Bhavana N Reddy; Prayaag Kini; Angel L Alberto-Delgado; Ron Jacob; Tiffany Chen; Victor A Ferrari; Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Yucheng Chen; Sanjaya Viswamitra; Yuchi Han
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.903

Review 7.  Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Miroslawa Gorecka; Malenka M Bissell; David M Higgins; Pankaj Garg; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.903

Review 8.  Dissecting Calcific Aortic Valve Disease-The Role, Etiology, and Drivers of Valvular Fibrosis.

Authors:  Petra Büttner; Lukas Feistner; Philipp Lurz; Holger Thiele; Joshua D Hutcheson; Florian Schlotter
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 9.  How to deal with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricle ejection fraction: from literature review to tips for clinical practice.

Authors:  F Contorni; M Fineschi; A Iadanza; A Santoro; G E Mandoli; M Cameli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.214

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.