| Literature DB >> 32369963 |
Francisco Javier Vázquez-Rodríguez1, Nora Elizondo-Villareal2, Luz Hypatia Verástegui2, Ana Maria Arato Tovar3, Jesus Fernando López-Perales3, José Eulalio Contreras de León3, Cristian Gómez-Rodríguez3, Daniel Fernández-González4, Luis Felipe Verdeja4, Linda Viviana García-Quiñonez5, Edén Amaral Rodríguez Castellanos3.
Abstract
In the present work, the effect of mineral aggregates (pumice stone and expanded clay aggregates) and chemical admixtures (superplasticizers and shrinkage reducing additives) as an alternative internal curing technique was investigated, to improve the properties of high-performance concrete. In the fresh and hardened state, concretes with partial replacements of Portland cement (CPC30R and OPC40C) by pulverized fly ash in combination with the addition of mineral aggregates and chemical admixtures were studied. The physical, mechanical, and durability properties in terms of slump, density, porosity, compressive strength, and permeability to chloride ions were respectively determined. The microstructural analysis was carried out by scanning electronic microscopy. The results highlight the effect of the addition of expanded clay aggregate on the internal curing of the concrete, which allowed developing the maximum compressive strength at 28 days (61 MPa). Meanwhile, the replacement of fine aggregate by 20% of pumice stone allowed developing the maximum compressive strength (52 MPa) in an OPC-based concrete at 180 days. The effectiveness of internal curing to develop higher strength is attributed to control in the porosity and a high water release at a later age. Finally, the lowest permeability value at 90 days (945 C) was found by the substitutions of fine aggregate by 20% of pumice stone saturated with shrinkage reducing admixture into pores and OPC40C by 15% of pulverized fly ash. It might be due to impeded diffusion of chloride ions into cement paste in the vicinity of pulverized fly ash, where the pozzolanic reaction has occurred. The proposed internal curing technology can be considered a real alternative to achieve the expected performance of a high-performance concrete since a concrete with a compressive strength range from 45 to 67 MPa, density range from 2130 to 2310 kg/m3, and exceptional durability (< 2000 C) was effectively developed.Entities:
Keywords: aggregates; cement; clays; concrete; fly ash; limestone; pumice; strength
Year: 2020 PMID: 32369963 PMCID: PMC7254348 DOI: 10.3390/ma13092090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical analysis of the raw material obtained by X-ray fluorescence (wt.%).
| Raw Material | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | Na2O | K2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS | 2.7 | 72 | 143 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.1 |
| EC [ | 0.2 | 58 | 27 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.3 |
| PFA | 2.2 | 63.7 | 25 | 4.9 | 0.6 | − |
| OPC40C | 65.8 | 20.7 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 0.3 | − |
| CPC30R [ | 62.2 | 17 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
Physical properties of aggregates used as curing agents.
| Material | Density ASTM C29-17 (kg/m3) | Blaine ASTM C204-17 (%) | Absorption ASTM C128-15 (%) | Volumetric Weight Dry ASTM C138-17 (kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay aggregate (EC) [ | 1840 | 4.1 | 27 | 990 |
| Pumice stone (PS) | 1470 | 4.9 | 30 | 460 |
Figure 1The average particle size of cementitious materials.
Figure 2Pumice stone characterization. (a) Morphology of the PS aggregate by SEM; (b) Internal structure of the PS aggregate by SEM; (c) Pore distribution in a PS particle by stereoscope; (d) Silica-alumina concentration by EDX analysis.
Description of concrete mixtures.
|
|
|
| R | Reference concrete elaborated with CPC30R (maximum consumption of cement 400 kg/m3). |
| RFA | Substitutions of CPC30R by the PFA in 15% of the mass. |
| IC | Internal curing with substitutions of fine aggregate by the PS (20% mass). |
| ICFA | Internal curing with substitutions of fine aggregate by the PS (20% in mass) and substitutions of CPC30R by the PFA in 15% of the mass. |
| ECFA | Substitution of coarse aggregates for clay aggregates and substitutions of CPC30R by the PFA in 15% of the mass. |
|
|
|
| R1 | Reference 1 is elaborated with OPC40C (maximum consumption of the cement 400 kg/m3). |
| IC2 | Substitutions of fine aggregate by the PS (20% in mass). |
| ICSRA | Substitutions of fine aggregate by the PS (20% in mass) with shrinkage reducing admixture. |
| V | Substitutions of fine aggregate by the PS (20% in mass) saturated with shrinkage reducing admixture into pores. |
| VFA | Substitutions of fine aggregate by the PS 20% (in mass) saturated with shrinkage reducing admixture into pores with substitutions of OPC40C by the PFA in 15% of the mass. |
Mixtures of concrete elaborated with CPC 30R (kg/m3). Stage 1 considering reference [60].
| Mixture | CPC30R | PFA | SRA | PS | EC | Water (w/c = 0.35) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 619 | − | 4 | 1440 | − | 214.6 |
| RFA | 510 | 90 | 4 | 1440 | − | 209.2 |
| IC | 620 | − | 4 | 1155 | − | 214.6 |
| ICFA | 510 | 90 | 4 | 1155 | − | 209.2 |
| ECFA | 510 | 90 | 4 | 1155 | 200 | 209.2 |
Mixtures of concretes elaborated with OPC 40C (kg/m3). Stage 2.
| Mixture | OPC 40C | PFA | FAg | CA | SRA | PS | Water (w/c = 0.40) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 382.5 | − | 889.9 | 712.9 | 2 | − | 153.7 |
| IC2 | 382.5 | − | 703.5 | 711.7 | − | 130.8 | 138.4 |
| ICSRA | 382.5 | − | 699.3 | 707.5 | 2 | 130.1 | 136.3 |
| V | 403.7 | − | 933.3 | 752.7 | 2 | 112.0 | 162.2 |
| VFA | 323 | 59.5 | 742.9 | 747.1 | 2 | 112.0 | 165.5 |
Figure 3Failure of the concrete sample in the compressive test.
Volumetric weight values of all experimental concrete.
| Mixtures (Stage 1) [ | Volumetric Weight (kg/m3) | Mixtures (Stage 2) | Volumetric Weight (kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| R | 2350 | R1 | 2400 |
| RFA | 2310 | IC2 | 2310 |
| IC | 2130 | ICSRA | 2310 |
| ICFA | 2160 | V | 2290 |
| ECFA | 2210 | VFA | 2260 |
The air content and slump in the experimental structural concrete.
| Mixtures (Stage 1) [ | ASTM C185-19 [ | Mixtures (Stage 2) | ASTM C173-16 [ | Slump ASTM C143-15 [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 1.5 | R1 | 2.7 | 13.5 |
| RFA | 2 | IC2 | 2.2 | 13 |
| IC | 1.5 | ICSRA | 2.2 | 14.5 |
| ICFA | 4 | V | 2.5 | 16.5 |
| ECFA | 3.5 | VFA | 2.5 | 21 |
Figure 4The compressive strength of concretes in stages 1 and 2.
Figure 5Microstructural evaluation through the Ca/Si ratio in ITZ. (a) ITZ between coarse aggregate and cementitious matrix in R1 concrete; (b) ITZ between pumice stone and cementitious matriz in R1 concrete; (c) ITZ between coarse aggregate and cementitious matrix in ICSRA concrete; (d) ITZ between PS and cementitious matrix in ICSRA concrete.
Figure 6Petrography of the ICSRA concrete.
Figure 7Open porosity of the concretes elaborated in stage 2.
Figure 8Comparison of the transmitted load of chloride ions in concretes elaborated in stage 2.