| Literature DB >> 32369498 |
Abigail L Whitehouse1, Naseem Mushtaq1, Lisa Miyashita1, Benjamin Barratt2, Ameerah Khan3, Harpal Kalsi1, Lee Koh1, Michele G Padovan1, Rossa Brugha1, Frances R Balkwill2,4, Andrew J Stagg5, Jonathan Grigg1.
Abstract
Urban particulate matter (PM) enhances airway dendritic cell (DC) maturation in vitro. However, to date, there are no data on the association between exposure to urban PM and DC maturation in vivo. We sought to determine whether exposure of school-age children (8 to 14 y) to PM was associated with expression of CD86, a marker of maturation of airway conventional DCs (cDC). Healthy London school children underwent spirometry and sputum induction. Flow cytometry was used to identify CD86 and CCR7 expression on cDC subsets (CD1c+ cDC2 and CD141+ cDC1). Tertiles of mean annual exposure to PM ≤ 10 microns (PM10) at the school address were determined using the London Air Quality Toolkit model. Tertiles of exposure from the 409 children from 19 schools recruited were; lower (23.1 to 25.6 μg/m3, n = 138), middle (25.6 to 26.8 μg/m3, n = 126), and upper (26.8 to 31.0 μg/m3, n = 145). DC expression was assessed in 164/370 (44%) children who completed sputum induction. The proportion (%) of cDC expressing CD86 in the lower exposure tertile (n = 47) was lower compared with the upper exposure tertile (n = 49); (52% (44 to 70%) vs 66% (51 to 82%), p<0.05). There was a higher percentage of cDC1 cells in the lower tertile of exposure (6.63% (2.48 to 11.64) vs. 2.63% (0.72 to 7.18), p<0.05). Additionally; children in the lower exposure tertile had increased FEV1 compared with children in the upper tertile; (median z-score 0.15 (-0.59 to 0.75) vs. -0.21 (-0.86 to 0.48), p<0.05. Our data reveal that children attending schools in the highest areas of PM exposure in London exhibit increased numbers of "mature" airway cDCs, as evidenced by their expression of the surface marker CD86. This data is supportive of previous in vitro data demonstrating an alteration in the maturation of airway cDCs in response to exposure to pollutants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32369498 PMCID: PMC7200006 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow cytometry identification of airway Dendritic Cell (DC) populations.
a) Viable sputum cells were identified on the basis of size and granularity (region R1). b) DCs were identified as a HLA-DR+Lineage- population and gated for further analysis (R2). c) CD11c expression was determined relative to the fluorescence levels of autologous non-myeloid sputum cells in the same sample. d-i) Airway DC expression of costimulatory molecule CD86 was determined relative to isotype‐matched control mAbs. Mature DCs defined as HLA-DR+Lin-CD11c+CD86+. f-g) Airway DC expression of subset marker CD1c was determined relative to isotype‐matched control mAbs. cDC2 DCs defined as HLA-DR+Lin-CD11c+CD1c+.h-i) Airway DC expression of subset marker CD141 was determined relative to isotype‐matched control mAbs. cDC1 DCs defined as HLA-DR+Lin-CD11c+CD141+. Percentage values in the figure refer to the results for the individual.
Fig 2Recruitment to study.
Demographics, atopic status, and induced sputum inflammatory cell differential by tertile of air pollution exposure.
| Tertile of Annual Mean PM10 Exposure at School | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Middle | Upper | ||||
| 138 | 126 | 145 | ||||
| 47 | 68 | 49 | ||||
| 11.3 (0.07) | 11.1 (0.12) | 11 (0.13) | ||||
| 46:92 | 69:57 | 89:57 | ||||
| 33:67 | 55:45 | 61:39 | ||||
| 148.1 | 148 | 147.6 | ||||
| 44.7 | 44.2 | 41.9 | ||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| | 55 | 39.9 | 59 | 46.8 | 61 | 42.1 |
| | 27 | 19.6 | 32 | 25.4 | 24 | 16.6 |
| | 6 | 4.3 | 3 | 2.2 | 6 | 4.1 |
| | 29 | 21.0 | 21 | 16.6 | 40 | 27.6 |
| | 12 | 8.7 | 10 | 7.9 | 14 | 9.7 |
| | 9 | 6.5 | 1 | 0.7 | ||
| 30 (21) | 36 (26) | 31 (21) | ||||
| 18 (13) | 23 (18.3) | 25 (17.2) | ||||
| 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.8) | 4 (2.8) | ||||
| 42 (30.4) | 35 (27.8) | 46 (31.7) | ||||
| 22 (16) | 19 (15.1) | 23 (15.9) | ||||
| 13 (9.4) | 7 (5.9) | 18 (12.4) | ||||
| 18 (13) | 18 (14.3) | 18 (12.4) | ||||
| 11 (8) | 9 (7.1) | 22 (15.2) | ||||
| 3 (2.2) | 3 (2.4) | 5 (3.4) | ||||
| 85 (10) | 73 (17.5) | 78 (14.3) | ||||
| 13 (8.5) | 18 (13.9) | 16 (10.6) | ||||
| 1 (1.2) | 7 (10.2) | 4.4 (6.7) | ||||
| 0.7 (1.9) | 1 (1.8) | 0.4 (0.74) | ||||
Parental smoking defined as any report of parental smoking, in or outside house (self-reported by child).y
Atopy (yes/no) was defined as self-reported atopy symptoms (hay fever, eczema).
SEM (standard error of the mean). HDM (house dust mite), SPT (skin prick test). SD (standard deviation)
Comparative data of participants with DC analysis vs non DC analysis in S1 Table
Fig 3FEV1.
Dot plot of FEV1 z-score–each triangle represents an individual participant’s z-score. Bar reflects median. Scaling omits 6 data points. Significant difference between upper and lower tertiles *p<0.05 by Mann Whitney.
Fig 4CD86.
Dot plot showing the proportion of cDCs expressing CD86 by tertile of mean annual PM10 exposure at the school address. Bar reflects median. Significant difference seen between lower and upper tertiles, *P<0.05 by Mann Whitney.
Fig 5CD1c.
Dot plot showing percentage of cDC1 in each individual sputum sample (defined as CD141 positive) divided by PM10 tertile. Each triangle represents a single participant’s result. Bar reflects median. Significant difference between lower and upper tertiles, *p<0.01 by Mann Whitney.