| Literature DB >> 32368637 |
Atiek Rostika Noviyanti1, Nur Akbar1, Yusi Deawati1, Engela Evy Ernawati1, Yoga Trianzar Malik1, Retna Putri Fauzia2.
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a material that has been widely applied to replace the damaged bone as a bone implant. Different types of HA have been successfully synthesized by a hydrothermal method based on calcium oxide (CaO) which was originated from chicken eggshells and diammonium hydrogen phosphate (DHP)/(NH4)2HPO4 as their precursors. We present a novel approach to the hydrothermal synthesis of HA form eggshells as a new precursor via a one-step synthesis method. The influence of temperature was also observed to study the effect on the crystallinity, purity, and morphology of obtained HAs. The synthesis was carried out at two different temperatures, 200 °C (HA-200) and 230 °C (HA-230) for 48 h respectively. The structures, purities, and morphologies of hydroxyapatite were analyzed by X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR), and Scanning Electron Microscopy- Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The XRD patterns show the HA main phase indicated the purity of 96.5% for HA-200 and 99.5% for HA-230. The TEM micrograph suggested a hexagonal-like of HA with an average particle size of 92.61 nm. Hexagonal-like of HAs are suitable for bone implants and further application.Entities:
Keywords: Eggshells; Hydrothermal; Hydroxyapatite; Materials science; Nanotechnology
Year: 2020 PMID: 32368637 PMCID: PMC7184525 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Phase Composition of chicken eggshells after calcination.
| Component | Composition (%) |
|---|---|
| CaO | 97.80 |
| P2O5 | 0.29 |
| Fe2O3 | 0.01 |
| SiO2 | 0.16 |
| K2O | 0.18 |
| SO3 | 0.16 |
| Al2O3 | 0.18 |
| MgO | 1.17 |
Figure 1XRD pattern of HA-200 and HA-230.
The lattice parameter, crystallite size and percentage of crystallinity of HA-200 and HA-230.
| Samples | Lattice parameter | Crystallite size (nm) | Crystallinity (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a = b (Å) | c = (Å) | |||
| HA-200 | 9.4155(8) | 6.8786(3) | 24.57 | 67.23 |
| HA-230 | 9.4168(1) | 6.8794(1) | 35.28 | 72.76 |
Figure 2The FTIR spectra of HA-200 (a) and HA-230 (b).
Comparison of FTIR spectra of HA-200 and HA-230.
| No | Functional Groups | Wavenumber at 200 °C (cm−1) | Wavenumber at 230 °C (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PO43- stretching | 566 and 962 | 565 and 962 |
| 2 | PO43- asymmetric stretching | 1025 | 1043 |
| 3 | PO43- asymmetric bending | 602 | 602 |
| 4 | Free O–H stretching | 3571 | 3571 |
| 5 | H–O–H | 3422 | 3422 |
| 6 | O–H bending | 632 | 632 |
| 7 | CO32- | 1403 | 1401 |
Figure 3SEM image of HA-200 (a) and HA-230 (b) surface.
Chemical Composition of HA-200 and HA-230 was analized by using SEM.
| Element | Content (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| HA-200 | HA-230 | |
| Ca | 47.02 | 45.98 |
| P | 14.93 | 15.56 |
| O | 38.05 | 38.45 |
Figure 4The elemental mapping of oxygen (O), calcium (Ca), and phosphor (P), respectively in HA-200 and HA-230. The distribution of each element is shown in a different colour.
Figure 5TEM micrograph of HA-200 (a) and HA-230 (b) surface.