| Literature DB >> 32368526 |
Suwandi Sugandi1, Rainy Umbas2, Mieke Satari3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Lycopene has been discussed as a potential effector in the prevention and therapy of prostate cancer. It is red, lipophilic and naturally occurring in many fruits and vegetables, such as tomatoes. Several growth factors, including insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), play important roles in carcinogenesis and metastasis. IGF-1 is a mitogen that plays important roles in the regulation of proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Binding of IGF-1 to its cognate membrane receptor activates Ras/Raf/MAP kinase signaling pathways, which regulate cell-cycle progression, cell survival, and transformation. Lycopene has its protective effect, which affects multiple IGF-1-activated signaling pathways. Lycopene stimulates apoptosis through intrinsic pathways, by stimulating the pro-apoptotic factor of the mitochondrial cavity such as the Bax/Bak protein (an apoptotic promotor). Although tomatoes are widely consumed in Indonesia, there is no research study about the effect of lycopene on prostate cancer in Indonesia. Hence, this study is conducted to measure the influence of lycopene on the level of IGF-1 in Indonesian human prostate cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: insulin growth factor-1; lycopene; prostate cancer
Year: 2020 PMID: 32368526 PMCID: PMC7173949 DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S232745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Rep Urol ISSN: 2253-2447
Figure 1Grouping of lycopene treatment in human prostate cancer cell culture.
Average IGF-1 Level Based on Lycopene Concentrations and Observation Time
| Treatment group | Observation Time (hour) | Average (SD) (ng/mL) | Range (ng/mL) | F test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 24 | 0.112 (0.0) | 0.112 | F count (treatment group) = 3870,558; p=0.000 (p<0.05) |
| 48 | 0.113 (0.0028) | 0.111‒0.115 | ||
| 72 | 0.1125 (0.0007) | 0.112‒0.113 | ||
| Group B | 24 | 0.112 (0.0) | 0.112 | |
| 48 | 0.112 (0.0) | 0.112 | ||
| 72 | 0.113 (0.0) | 0.113 | ||
| Group C | 24 | 0,.115 (0.0049) | 0.108–0.115 | |
| 48 | 0.112 (0.0028) | 0.110–0.114 | ||
| 72 | 0.112 (0.0) | 0.112 | ||
| Group D | 24 | 0.112 (0.0) | 0.112 | |
| 48 | 0.760 (0.0141) | 0.750–0.770 | ||
| 72 | 0.690 (0.0) | 0.690 | ||
| Group E | 24 | 0.785 (0.0212) | 0.770–0.800 | |
| 48 | 0.680 (0.0) | 0.680 | ||
| 72 | 0.515 (0.0212) | 0.530–0.630 | ||
Difference in Average of IGF-1 Level from Combination Treatment Based on Factorial Scheme Analysis
| Treatment Group | Observation Time (hour) | Average (SD) (ng/mL) | Range (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Group A | 24 Hour | 0.112 (0.0) | 0.112 |
Figure 2Average IGF-1 level on various lycopene concentrations and observation time.