| Literature DB >> 32367953 |
Novan Fully Proud Tembo1, John Bwalya Muma2, Bernard Hang'ombe3, Musso Munyeme2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) remains a major public health issue in Zambia and has been exacerbated by human immunodeficiency virus prevalence and consumption of unpasteurized milk in the Southern Province of the country. The prevalence of bTB has been established to be linked to Kafue Lechwe, which act as reservoir hosts and share grazing fields with domestic cattle. No studies have so far used geographic information system (GIS) to investigate the relationship between the reservoir hosts (Kafue Lechwe) and domestic animals. This study, therefore, aimed to apply GIS to investigate the spatial distribution of bTB in Namwala District of the Southern Province of the country.Entities:
Keywords: geographic information system; reservoir hosts; spatial distribution; zoonotic tuberculosis (bovine tuberculosis)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32367953 PMCID: PMC7183465 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.478-488
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1Map of Zambia, showing the geographical location of Namwala District in relation to other Districts in Zambia.
Figure-2Detailed Map of Namwala District, relative to the game management area, showing the names of some of the villages and areas under study, insert shows the Map of Zambia (Munyeme, 2010; co-author).
Figure-3Condemned lungs due to suspected infection with bovine tuberculosis (see the arrows). The criterion was the caseous material and tubercles in the pathological lungs.
The individual prevalence of bovine tuberculosis from the 20 locations geo-captured.
| Location No. herd | Number of herds | Area prevalence % | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Namwala central | 21 | 14 | 2.4-26.2 |
| Chinyemu | 18 | 0 | n/a |
| Baambwe | 25 | 8.6 | 0-18 |
| Kawalizhi | 22 | 11.4 | 0.5-22.3 |
| Musongwa | 19 | 2.8 | 0-8.5 |
| Mbeza | 90 | 5.7 | 0-13.6 |
| Mbeza | 89 | 5.7 | 0-13.6 |
| Kwa Nico | 71 | 8.6 | 0-18.1 |
| Chitongo | 95 | 2.9 | 0-8.5 |
| Maala | 12 | 2.9 | 0-8.5 |
| Maala | 29 | 5.7 | 0-13.6 |
| Nakwanza | 13 | 8.6 | 0-18.1 |
| Kantengwa | 14 | 2.9 | 0-8.5 |
| Mahungu | 19 | 2.9 | 0-8.5 |
| Butele | 175 | 5.7 | 0-13.6 |
| Kabulamwanda | 205 | 2.9 | 0-8.5 |
| Kasaka | 130 | 0 | n/a |
| Kasenga | 106 | 0 | n/a |
| Shikolopa | 100 | 0 | n/a |
| Shimbizi | 177 | 8.5 | 0-18.1 |
Figure-4Spatial distribution of villages (dots), which had positive cattle herds in proximity to interface areas and National Parks, circles within the figure indicate the approximate geographical distribution in relation to the size of cattle herds being positive.
Figure-5The bovine tuberculosis cases within a 10 km buffer of the game management areas.
The test for autocorrelation was done using Moran’s I.
| Variables | Moran’s I | Z | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | E(I) | Sd (I) | |||
| Herd size | 0.18 | −0.053 | 0.093 | 2.519 | 0.006 |
p≤0.05
Summary of biologically plausible deterministic and risk factors that were considered across all the study villages and their proportional representation.
| Risk factor | Proportion % | Confidence interval |
|---|---|---|
| Positive herd | 36.46 | 26.7-46.30 |
| Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination | 29.17 | 19.9-38.4 |
| Treated for TB | 65.63 | 56.0-75.3 |
| TB knowledge | 40.63 | 30.6-50.6 |
| Sour milk drinking | 79.2 | 70.9-87.4 |
| Boiling milk | 26.04 | 17.1-35.0 |
| Freq. of milk | 81.25 | 78.0-97.8 |
| Keeping cattle | 97.95 | 93.3-99.7 |
| Condemnation | 66.67 | 57.1-76.3 |
| Drinking water sharing | 91.67 | 86.0-97.3 |
| Contact with wildlife | 52.08 | 41.9-62.3 |
TB=Tuberculosis
Some risk factors which were considered significant at univariate analysis.
| Risk factor | Chi-square | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Contact with wildlife | 9.42 | 0.002 |
| Movement to the plains | 10.12 | 0.001 |
| Sharing drinking water with wildlife | 5.62 | 0.017 |
| Condemnation at abattoir due to tuberculosis | 5.76 | 0.016 |
Variables with Fisher’s exact p≤0.25 were identified as risk factors for inclusion in the multivariable model (and all the above variables thus transferred for analysis in the multivariate analysis logistic regression model)
Herd-level risk factors for bTB positivity in cattle herds of Namwala District (n=96) in Zambia. Results from the final multivariable logistic regression model.
| Variable | Level | SE( | p-value | OR | 95% Confidence interval (OR) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.19 | - | - | |
| Contact with wildlife | Yes | 0.94 | 0.2 | 0.048 | 0.24 | 0.15-3.86 |
| No | - | - | 1 | - | ||
| Movement of cattle to the plains | Yes | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.32-2.40 |
| No | - | - | - | 1 | - | |
| Sharing grazing and drinking water with wildlife | Yes | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.01 | 5.51 | 4.1-73.4 |
| No | - | - | - | 1 | - | |
| Organs condemned at abattoir due to TB | Yes | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 1.1 | 0.29-1.3 |
| No | - | - | - | 1 | - |
bTB=Bovine tuberculosis, TB=Tuberculosis