Literature DB >> 32367687

Best Practices for Preclinical In Vivo Testing of Cancer Nanomedicines.

Danielle M Valcourt1, Chintan H Kapadia1, Mackenzie A Scully1, Megan N Dang1, Emily S Day1,2,3.   

Abstract

Significant advances have been made in the development of nanoparticles for cancer treatment in recent years. Despite promising results in preclinical animal models, cancer nanomedicines often fail in clinical trials. This failure rate could be reduced by defining stringent criteria for testing and quality control during the design and development stages, and by performing carefully planned preclinical studies in relevant animal models. This article discusses best practices for the evaluation of nanomedicines in murine tumor models. First, a recommended set of experiments to perform is introduced, including discussion of the types of data to collect during these studies. This is followed by an outline of various tumor models and their clinical relevance. Next, different routes of nanoparticle administration are overviewed, followed by a summary of important controls to include in in vivo studies of nanomedicine. Finally, animal welfare considerations are discussed, and an overview of the steps involved in achieving US Food and Drug Administration approval after animal studies are completed is provided. Researchers should use this report as a guideline for effective preclinical evaluation of cancer nanomedicine. As the community adopts best practices for in vivo testing, the rate of clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines is likely to improve.
© 2020 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; clinical translation; experimental design; murine tumor models; nanoparticles

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32367687      PMCID: PMC7473451          DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202000110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater        ISSN: 2192-2640            Impact factor:   9.933


  53 in total

1.  Human tumor xenografts: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Richard A Morgan
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 2.  Immunogenicity of subcutaneously administered therapeutic proteins--a mechanistic perspective.

Authors:  Anas M Fathallah; Richard B Bankert; Sathy V Balu-Iyer
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  The influence of the route of administration of gold nanoparticles on their tissue distribution and basic biochemical parameters: In vivo studies.

Authors:  Marek Bednarski; Magdalena Dudek; Joanna Knutelska; Leszek Nowiński; Jacek Sapa; Małgorzata Zygmunt; Gabriel Nowak; Magdalena Luty-Błocho; Marek Wojnicki; Krzysztof Fitzner; Maciej Tęsiorowski
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.024

Review 4.  Minimum information reporting in bio-nano experimental literature.

Authors:  Matthew Faria; Mattias Björnmalm; Kristofer J Thurecht; Stephen J Kent; Robert G Parton; Maria Kavallaris; Angus P R Johnston; J Justin Gooding; Simon R Corrie; Ben J Boyd; Pall Thordarson; Andrew K Whittaker; Molly M Stevens; Clive A Prestidge; Christopher J H Porter; Wolfgang J Parak; Thomas P Davis; Edmund J Crampin; Frank Caruso
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Retro-orbital injections in mice.

Authors:  Tal Yardeni; Michael Eckhaus; H Douglas Morris; Marjan Huizing; Shelley Hoogstraten-Miller
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.625

6.  Patisiran, an RNAi therapeutic for the treatment of hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis.

Authors:  Arnt V Kristen; Senda Ajroud-Driss; Isabel Conceição; Peter Gorevic; Theodoros Kyriakides; Laura Obici
Journal:  Neurodegener Dis Manag       Date:  2018-11-27

7.  The Lymphatic Immune Response Induced by the Adjuvant AS01: A Comparison of Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Immunization Routes.

Authors:  Melanie R Neeland; Wei Shi; Catherine Collignon; Nadine Taubenheim; Els N T Meeusen; Arnaud M Didierlaurent; Michael J de Veer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 8.  Application of GFP imaging in cancer.

Authors:  Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 9.  Nanomaterial Applications in Photothermal Therapy for Cancer.

Authors:  Austin C V Doughty; Ashley R Hoover; Elivia Layton; Cynthia K Murray; Eric W Howard; Wei R Chen
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Murine melanoma: a model for intracranial metastasis.

Authors:  A Raz; I R Hart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Nanoparticles use for Delivering Ursolic Acid in Cancer Therapy: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Andang Miatmoko; Ester Adelia Mianing; Retno Sari; Esti Hendradi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 2.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to Human Therapeutic Nanoparticle Development.

Authors:  Thelvia I Ramos; Carlos A Villacis-Aguirre; Katherine V López-Aguilar; Leandro Santiago Padilla; Claudia Altamirano; Jorge R Toledo; Nelson Santiago Vispo
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 3.  Membrane-wrapped nanoparticles for photothermal cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sara B Aboeleneen; Mackenzie A Scully; Jenna C Harris; Eric H Sterin; Emily S Day
Journal:  Nano Converg       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 4.  Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic.

Authors:  Snežana Đorđević; María Medel Gonzalez; Inmaculada Conejos-Sánchez; Barbara Carreira; Sabina Pozzi; Rita C Acúrcio; Ronit Satchi-Fainaro; Helena F Florindo; María J Vicent
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.617

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.