Literature DB >> 32367472

Acute Regulation of the Arousal-Enhancing Drugs Caffeine and Modafinil on Class IIa HDACs In Vivo and In Vitro: Focus on HDAC7.

Alejandra Bernardi1, Oscar V Torres2, Maximo Sosa1, Javier A Muñiz1, Francisco J Urbano3, Jean Lud Cadet4, Veronica Bisagno5.   

Abstract

Psychostimulant drugs, such as modafinil and caffeine, induce transcriptional alterations through the dysregulation of epigenetic mechanisms. We have previously demonstrated that acute modafinil administration is accompanied by multiple changes in the expression of histone deacetylases (HDACs) within the mouse medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Herein, we compared alterations in class IIa HDACs in the mouse mPFC and dorsal striatum (DS) after a single exposure to each psychostimulant. We treated male C57BL/6 mice with modafinil (90 mg/kg, i.p.), caffeine (10 mg/kg, i.p.), or vehicle and evaluated locomotor activity. Following, we examined hdac4, hdac5, and hdac7 mRNA expression using qRT-PCR and HDAC7, pHDAC7, and pHDACs4/5/7 using Western blot. Last, we explored generalized effects in N2a cell line using modafinil (100 μM and 1 mM) or caffeine (80 μM and 800 μM). Our results indicate that modafinil had greater effects on locomotor activity compared with caffeine. qRT-PCR experiments revealed that modafinil decreased hdac5 and hdac7 mRNA expression in the DS, while caffeine had no effects. In the mPFC, modafinil increased hdac7 mRNA expression, with no effects observed for caffeine. Western blot revealed that within the DS, modafinil induced increases in HDAC7, pHDAC7, and pHDACs4/5/7 protein expression, while, in the mPFC, caffeine induced decreases in HDAC7, pHDAC7, and pHDACs4/5/7 protein levels. In vitro studies revealed that modafinil increased hdac4, hdac5, and hdac7 mRNA levels in N2a, while caffeine only increased hdac5 at a higher dose. These findings support the notion that modafinil and caffeine exert distinct regulation of class IIa HDAC family members and that these transcriptional and translational consequences are region-specific.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caffeine; Dorsal striatum; HDACs; Modafinil; N2a cell line; mPFC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32367472     DOI: 10.1007/s12640-020-00200-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotox Res        ISSN: 1029-8428            Impact factor:   3.911


  33 in total

1.  Effects of T-type calcium channel blockers on cocaine-induced hyperlocomotion and thalamocortical GABAergic abnormalities in mice.

Authors:  Verónica Bisagno; Mariana Raineri; Viviana Peskin; Silvia I Wikinski; Osvaldo D Uchitel; Rodolfo R Llinás; Francisco J Urbano
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Regulation of class IIa HDAC activities: it is not only matter of subcellular localization.

Authors:  Eros Di Giorgio; Claudio Brancolini
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.778

3.  HDAC superfamily promoters acetylation is differentially regulated by modafinil and methamphetamine in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Betina González; Alejandra Bernardi; Oscar V Torres; Subramaniam Jayanthi; Natalia Gomez; Máximo H Sosa; Edgar García-Rill; Francisco J Urbano; Jean-Lud Cadet; Verónica Bisagno
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  The stimulant effects of caffeine on locomotor behaviour in mice are mediated through its blockade of adenosine A(2A) receptors.

Authors:  M El Yacoubi; C Ledent; J F Ménard; M Parmentier; J Costentin; J M Vaugeois
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Adenosine receptors and brain diseases: neuroprotection and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Catarina V Gomes; Manuella P Kaster; Angelo R Tomé; Paula M Agostinho; Rodrigo A Cunha
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-09

6.  ERK/MAPK regulates hippocampal histone phosphorylation following contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Wilson B Chwang; Kenneth J O'Riordan; Jonathan M Levenson; J David Sweatt
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 7.  Cognitive enhancers versus addictive psychostimulants: The good and bad side of dopamine on prefrontal cortical circuits.

Authors:  Veronica Bisagno; Betina González; Francisco J Urbano
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 8.  Epigenetic landscape of amphetamine and methamphetamine addiction in rodents.

Authors:  Arthur Godino; Subramaniam Jayanthi; Jean Lud Cadet
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

9.  Mechanisms of modafinil: A review of current research.

Authors:  Paul Gerrard; Robert Malcolm
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 10.  Transcriptional and epigenetic substrates of methamphetamine addiction and withdrawal: evidence from a long-access self-administration model in the rat.

Authors:  Jean Lud Cadet; Christie Brannock; Subramaniam Jayanthi; Irina N Krasnova
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.