Elena S Novitskaya1, Annegret H Dahlmann-Noor2, Gillian G W Adams2, Louise E Allen3. 1. Ophthalmology Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. elena.novitskaya@gmail.com. 2. Paediatric and Strabismus Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 3. Ophthalmology Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate current anaesthetic practice for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) interventions in the UK. We collected the data from the 12-month prospective British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit study carried out in 2013/2014 that were analysed with regard to type of anaesthesia used for primary ROP procedures and the hospital department in which treatment took place. A total of 327 cases of treated ROP from 55 different UK units were reported in the study. Type of anaesthesia used during treatment was available for 324 (99.1%) cases and the treatment location in 316 (96.6%). Overall, 266 (89.3%) laser treatments and 13 (50.0%) of primary intravitreal injections were performed with the neonate intubated, using intravenous sedation (IVS) in 158 (59.4%) and the remainder, under general anaesthesia (GA). Two hundred thirteen (67.4%) of all ROP procedures took place in the neonatal unit. GA was used in 98 (95.1%) of theatre cases compared with 19 (8.9%) of cases treated in the neonatal unit. Three (0.9%) neonates suffered significant respiratory distress during or immediately after laser treatment. Conclusion: This survey suggests that the preference in UK units is to undertake ROP laser treatment in the neonatal unit with the neonate intubated and sedated intravenously. Those babies treated in the operating theatre are more likely to receive GA. In the surveyed year, half of the neonates receiving intravitreal injections as sole primary therapy was intubated; the reason for this could not be elucidated from the responses. Adverse respiratory reactions during or after laser treatment affected fewer than 1% of the neonates in this study. What is Known: • Prior to the introduction of intravitreal anti-VEGF, almost all ROP treatments in the UK were performed under general anaesthetic (GA). • The technique of intravitreal injection is described using topical anaesthesia and was thought to be changing anaesthesia preferences for ROP treatment. What is New: • Half of the neonates receiving primary anti-VEGF injection in the UK were treated under intravenous sedation or GA. • The increasing use of primary anti-VEGF treatment has not influenced trends in anaesthetic practice in the UK since the last review 10 years ago.
The aim of this study is to evaluate current anaesthetic practice for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) interventions in the UK. We collected the data from the 12-month prospective British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit study carried out in 2013/2014 that were analysed with regard to type of anaesthesia used for primary ROP procedures and the hospital department in which treatment took place. A total of 327 cases of treated ROP from 55 different UK units were reported in the study. Type of anaesthesia used during treatment was available for 324 (99.1%) cases and the treatment location in 316 (96.6%). Overall, 266 (89.3%) laser treatments and 13 (50.0%) of primary intravitreal injections were performed with the neonate intubated, using intravenous sedation (IVS) in 158 (59.4%) and the remainder, under general anaesthesia (GA). Two hundred thirteen (67.4%) of all ROP procedures took place in the neonatal unit. GA was used in 98 (95.1%) of theatre cases compared with 19 (8.9%) of cases treated in the neonatal unit. Three (0.9%) neonates suffered significant respiratory distress during or immediately after laser treatment. Conclusion: This survey suggests that the preference in UK units is to undertake ROP laser treatment in the neonatal unit with the neonate intubated and sedated intravenously. Those babies treated in the operating theatre are more likely to receive GA. In the surveyed year, half of the neonates receiving intravitreal injections as sole primary therapy was intubated; the reason for this could not be elucidated from the responses. Adverse respiratory reactions during or after laser treatment affected fewer than 1% of the neonates in this study. What is Known: • Prior to the introduction of intravitreal anti-VEGF, almost all ROP treatments in the UK were performed under general anaesthetic (GA). • The technique of intravitreal injection is described using topical anaesthesia and was thought to be changing anaesthesia preferences for ROP treatment. What is New: • Half of the neonates receiving primary anti-VEGF injection in the UK were treated under intravenous sedation or GA. • The increasing use of primary anti-VEGF treatment has not influenced trends in anaesthetic practice in the UK since the last review 10 years ago.
Entities:
Keywords:
General anaesthesia; Neonatal anaesthesia; Prematurity; Respiratory distress; Retinopathy of prematurity; Sedation