Literature DB >> 32367062

Keep mental health in mind.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32367062      PMCID: PMC7197232          DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0914-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


× No keyword cloud information.
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread around the world, efforts have—rightly so—focused on addressing immediate medical needs: slowing down viral transmission chains to reduce the number of cases, optimize health-systems capacity and prevent fatalities. Now, 4 months into the pandemic, and with the realization that the end of the crisis is nowhere near, a different dimension of public health emerges and requires urgent attention. That is the toll of the pandemic on people’s mental health and well-being. Studies of past outbreaks provide some insight into the detrimental effects of similar crises on population-wide mental health. The 2003 SARS epidemic was associated with a 30% increase in suicides in people over the age of 65; almost a third of healthcare workers reported probable emotional distress; and survivors were found to be at risk for post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Mitigation strategies such as quarantine, although necessary to contain viral spread, have a negative psychological impact, such as causing post-traumatic stress symptoms, emotional disturbance, depression and insomnia. Job loss and financial struggles during global economic downturn—which are already happening with the current pandemic—have been associated with a long-lasting decline in mental health. The scale, pervasiveness and complexity of the stressors associated with the ongoing pandemic are unprecedented in recent times. There is no accurate template for what is yet to come, but odds are that a surge in the prevalence of mental-health problem is on the horizon. In fact, a study of over a thousand healthcare workers who cared for patients with COVID-19 in China showed that a considerable proportion of participants reported symptoms of depression (50%), anxiety (45%), insomnia (34%) and distress (72%). The droves of people exposed to the frontlines of the pandemic, such as essential workers, people with underlying health issues, and patients with COVID-19 and their caregivers, as well as people with pre-existing mental-health conditions, have been rendered particularly vulnerable to poor mental-health outcomes. The pandemic undoubtedly has created almost universal psychological distress. A plan to address the problem and to prevent the long-term mental-health deterioration of segments of the population at most risk is paramount at this point in the COVID-19 response. In March 2020, the World Health Organization released recommendations for safeguarding mental health, which are tailored to the individual person and are designed for immediate considerations. Similar guidelines have been issued by governmental agencies in the USA, the UK and other countries. However, much more needs to be done. A comprehensive assessment of the prevalence, severity and nature of COVID-19-related mental-health challenges, as well as the factors that contribute to risk and resilience, across the general public and especially in at-risk populations, will enable governments to plan for the inevitable wave of mental-health problems and dedicate the necessary resources for targeted interventions. Research initiatives tackling COVID-19 and mental health have tended to be small in scale and localized; however, this landscape is changing, and larger studies are now underway. A nationwide survey in China reported that about a third of respondents experienced psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Similar studies in the UK have also revealed increased feelings of anxiety and depression and widespread concerns about the effect of social isolation on well-being, both in the general population and among people with pre-existing mental-health conditions. A study by the National Institute of Mental Health was recently launched in the USA, in which participants are asked about mental-health symptoms and COVID-19-related stress in the form of a questionnaire every 2 weeks for up to 6 months. Global action to map the landscape and longitudinal effects of COVID-19 on mental health across the various stages of the pandemic must be initiated immediately. One approach to preempt an onslaught of mental-health problems on already overburdened healthcare systems could be to switch from individual-based approaches to population-wide screening aimed at identifying people at elevated risk. New innovations in digital health could be leveraged to assess mental-illness risk in large populations. For example, smartphone-based surveys, coupled with automated machine-learning analyses, have shown promise in identifying patients who are at risk for developing post-traumatic stress disorder. Digital phenotyping, which uses passively collected data to flag early signs of mental illness, is also gaining momentum. The development of both approaches, however, is still in its infancy, and rigorous testing of performance is needed before such initiatives can be rolled out at scale. A more immediate alternative would be to integrate psychiatric screening into primary care, using validated instruments such as the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) to identify initial symptoms of depression and anxiety and to enable early, targeted intervention. Researchers specializing in psychology, psychiatry, behavioral and social science, and digital health, as well as healthcare providers, policymakers and other stakeholders, must work together and toward innovative and practical technologies to address the mental-health needs under the current pandemic condition. Collecting and analyzing large-scale, high-quality data has to be prioritized now so that tailored and effective mental-health services can be implemented to best mitigate the long-term mental-health consequences of the pandemic later. As the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic shifts from acute to protracted, attention must be paid to the potentially devastating effects on population-wide mental health and emotional and social well-being. There will be no easy solution, but high-quality research, coupled with recent innovations in digital health, could enable health services to offer proactive and tailored mental-health care for those in need.
  10 in total

Review 1.  How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Carmen Moreno; Til Wykes; Silvana Galderisi; Merete Nordentoft; Nicolas Crossley; Nev Jones; Mary Cannon; Christoph U Correll; Louise Byrne; Sarah Carr; Eric Y H Chen; Philip Gorwood; Sonia Johnson; Hilkka Kärkkäinen; John H Krystal; Jimmy Lee; Jeffrey Lieberman; Carlos López-Jaramillo; Miia Männikkö; Michael R Phillips; Hiroyuki Uchida; Eduard Vieta; Antonio Vita; Celso Arango
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 27.083

2.  How much of an impact did COVID-19 self-isolation measures have on mental health?

Authors:  Yasuhiro Omiya; Shinichi Tokuno
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2020-10-14

3.  Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown.

Authors:  Ilya M Veer; Antje Riepenhausen; Matthias Zerban; Carolin Wackerhagen; Lara M C Puhlmann; Judith M C van Leeuwen; Oliver Tüscher; Kenneth S L Yuen; Henrik Walter; Raffael Kalisch; Haakon Engen; Göran Köber; Sophie A Bögemann; Jeroen Weermeijer; Aleksandra Uściłko; Netali Mor; Marta A Marciniak; Adrian Dahl Askelund; Abbas Al-Kamel; Sarah Ayash; Giulia Barsuola; Vaida Bartkute-Norkuniene; Simone Battaglia; Yaryna Bobko; Sven Bölte; Paolo Cardone; Edita Chvojková; Kaja Damnjanović; Joana De Calheiros Velozo; Lena de Thurah; Yacila I Deza-Araujo; Annika Dimitrov; Kinga Farkas; Clémence Feller; Mary Gazea; Donya Gilan; Vedrana Gnjidić; Michal Hajduk; Anu P Hiekkaranta; Live S Hofgaard; Laura Ilen; Zuzana Kasanova; Mohsen Khanpour; Bobo Hi Po Lau; Dionne B Lenferink; Thomas B Lindhardt; Dávid Á Magas; Julian Mituniewicz; Laura Moreno-López; Sofiia Muzychka; Maria Ntafouli; Aet O'Leary; Ilenia Paparella; Nele Põldver; Aki Rintala; Natalia Robak; Anna M Rosická; Espen Røysamb; Siavash Sadeghi; Maude Schneider; Roma Siugzdaite; Mirta Stantić; Ana Teixeira; Ana Todorovic; Wendy W N Wan; Rolf van Dick; Klaus Lieb; Birgit Kleim; Erno J Hermans; Dorota Kobylińska; Talma Hendler; Harald Binder; Inez Myin-Germeys
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Within- and across-day patterns of interplay between depressive symptoms and related psychopathological processes: a dynamic network approach during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Omid V Ebrahimi; Julian Burger; Asle Hoffart; Sverre Urnes Johnson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Mechanisms associated with the trajectory of depressive and anxiety symptoms: A linear mixed-effects model during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Omid V Ebrahimi; Asle Hoffart; Sverre Urnes Johnson
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-02-04

6.  Factors Affecting the Psychological Well-Being of Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Crisis.

Authors:  Muffarah H Alharthi; Abdulaziz T Alshomrani; Khalid Bazaid; Hany M A Sonpol; Ibrahim A E Ibrahim; Ayman M Alashkar
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-07-28

7.  Preliminary quantitative assessment of the multidimensional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Sustainable Development Goals.

Authors:  Mohamed Elsamadony; Manabu Fujii; Masahiro Ryo; Francesco Fuso Nerini; Kaoru Kakinuma; Shinjiro Kanae
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 11.072

8.  Missing Diagnoses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Year in Review.

Authors:  Héctor Pifarré I Arolas; Josep Vidal-Alaball; Joan Gil; Francesc López; Catia Nicodemo; Marc Saez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  PTSD symptoms among health workers and public service providers during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Sverre Urnes Johnson; Omid V Ebrahimi; Asle Hoffart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing concerns for the economic consequence of the COVID-19 response and mental health problems associated with economic vulnerability and negative economic shock in Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Cristiano Codagnone; Francesco Bogliacino; Camilo Gómez; Rafael Charris; Felipe Montealegre; Giovanni Liva; Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva; Frans Folkvord; Giuseppe A Veltri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.