Literature DB >> 32366757

Predictive Value of an Alternative Strategy for Measuring Depth and Size of Stage 1 Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Stephanie L Skala1, Jasmine A Ebott2, Lili Zhao3, Richard W Lieberman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite poor reproducibility for measuring vulvar cancer depth, 1-mm or greater invasion triggers lymphadenectomy for small tumors. Previous literature suggests that measuring depth from the nearest dysplastic rete peg (alternative method) rather than highest dermal papilla (conventional method) may be acceptable.
METHODS: Pathologic staging and follow-up information were recorded for 100 pT1 vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) resected from 1990 to 2019. Conventional depth, alternative depth, gross/clinical size, and size of the invasive component were measured for each tumor. In this retrospective study, we evaluated which clinicopathologic factors were most predictive of lymph node involvement and recurrence.
RESULTS: Depending on the measurements used (conventional vs alternative depth, clinical lesion size vs cumulative extent of invasive component), between 1 and 18 cases were downstaged to pT1a. All such cases were pN0, without lymphovascular or perineural invasion. Infiltrative cords (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.15; 95% CI = 1.63-16.2; p = .005) and perineural invasion (HR = 3.16; 1.18-8.45; p = .022) were most strongly associated with groin recurrence. Of staging criteria evaluated, only cumulative extent of the invasive component 2 cm or greater was significantly associated with groin recurrence (HR = 2.87; 1.01-8.17; p = .048). The Kaplan-Meier curves for local recurrence-free survival by stage did not show significant separation regardless of method.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients downstaged using alternative measurement techniques lacked nodal disease/recurrence; one-third of those with nodal sampling experienced postoperative morbidity. Our data suggest that the use of alternative depth and cumulative extent of invasion could safely allow some conventional stage IB vulvar SCC patients to avoid groin surgery, thereby reducing treatment-related morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32366757     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  3 in total

1.  FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva: 2021 revision.

Authors:  Alexander B Olawaiye; Joseph Cotler; Mauricio A Cuello; Neerja Bhatla; Aikou Okamoto; Sarikapan Wilailak; Chittaranjan N Purandare; Gerhard Lindeque; Jonathan S Berek; Sean Kehoe
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

2.  Cancer of the vulva: 2021 update.

Authors:  Alexander B Olawaiye; Mauricio A Cuello; Linda J Rogers
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

Review 3.  Management of Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer.

Authors:  Priscila Grecca Pedrão; Yasmin Medeiros Guimarães; Luani Rezende Godoy; Júlio César Possati-Resende; Adriane Cristina Bovo; Carlos Eduardo Mattos Cunha Andrade; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Ricardo Dos Reis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.