Literature DB >> 32366664

Exemplar learning reveals the representational origins of expert category perception.

Elliot Collins1,2, Marlene Behrmann3.   

Abstract

Irrespective of whether one has substantial perceptual expertise for a class of stimuli, an observer invariably encounters novel exemplars from this class. To understand how novel exemplars are represented, we examined the extent to which previous experience with a category constrains the acquisition and nature of representation of subsequent exemplars from that category. Participants completed a perceptual training paradigm with either novel other-race faces (category of experience) or novel computer-generated objects (YUFOs) that included pairwise similarity ratings at the beginning, middle, and end of training, and a 20-d visual search training task on a subset of category exemplars. Analyses of pairwise similarity ratings revealed multiple dissociations between the representational spaces for those learning faces and those learning YUFOs. First, representational distance changes were more selective for faces than YUFOs; trained faces exhibited greater magnitude in representational distance change relative to untrained faces, whereas this trained-untrained distance change was much smaller for YUFOs. Second, there was a difference in where the representational distance changes were observed; for faces, representations that were closer together before training exhibited a greater distance change relative to those that were farther apart before training. For YUFOs, however, the distance changes occurred more uniformly across representational space. Last, there was a decrease in dimensionality of the representational space after training on YUFOs, but not after training on faces. Together, these findings demonstrate how previous category experience governs representational patterns of exemplar learning as well as the underlying dimensionality of the representational space.

Entities:  

Keywords:  category learning; mental representations; object recognition; perceptual learning; visual expertise

Year:  2020        PMID: 32366664      PMCID: PMC7245133          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1912734117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

Review 1.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise.

Authors:  M J Tarr; I Gauthier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Other-race and inversion effects during the structural encoding stage of face processing in a race categorization task: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Stéphanie Caharel; Benoît Montalan; Emilie Fromager; Christian Bernard; Robert Lalonde; Rebaï Mohamed
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Should we reject the expertise hypothesis?

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Cindy Bukach
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-06-14

4.  A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

5.  Visual search strategy, selective attention, and expertise in soccer.

Authors:  A M Williams; K Davids
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Categorization training increases the perceptual separability of novel dimensions.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-03-25

7.  Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Chun-Chia Kung; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Multi-PIE.

Authors:  Ralph Gross; Iain Matthews; Jeff Cohn; Takeo Kanade; Simon Baker
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Autom Face Gesture Recognit       Date:  2010-05-01

9.  Studying real-world perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Michael L Mack; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-06

10.  Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Marieke Mur; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  Activity in perirhinal and entorhinal cortex predicts perceived visual similarities among category exemplars with highest precision.

Authors:  Kayla M Ferko; Anna Blumenthal; Chris B Martin; Daria Proklova; Alexander N Minos; Lisa M Saksida; Timothy J Bussey; Ali R Khan; Stefan Köhler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 2.  Face Recognition by Humans and Machines: Three Fundamental Advances from Deep Learning.

Authors:  Alice J O'Toole; Carlos D Castillo
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 7.745

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.