| Literature DB >> 32365787 |
Aleksandra Bartkowiak1, Bartosz Orwat1,2, Maciej Zalas1, Przemyslaw Ledwon3, Ireneusz Kownacki1,2, Waldemar Tejchman4.
Abstract
Very recently, we have reported the synthesis and evaluation of biological properties of new merocyanine dyes composed of triphenylamine moiety, π-aromatic spacer, and rhodanine/2-thiohydantoin-based moiety. Interestingly, 2-thiohydantoin has never been studied before as an electron-accepting/anchoring group for the dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). In the presented study, we examined the applicability of 2-thiohydantoin, an analog of rhodanine, in DSSC technology. The research included theoretical calculations, electrochemical measurements, optical characterization, and tests of the solar cells. As a result, we proved that 2-thiohydantoin might be considered as an acceptor/anchoring group since all the compounds examined in this study were active. The most efficient device showed power conversion efficiency of 2.59%, which is a promising value for molecules of such a simple structure. It was found that the cells' performances were mainly attributed to the dye loading and the ICT molecular absorption coefficients, both affected by the differences in the chemical structure of the dyes. Moreover, the effect of the aromatic spacer size and the introduction of carboxymethyl co-anchoring group on photovoltaic properties was observed and discussed.Entities:
Keywords: DSSC; TiO2; acceptor; anchor; dye; photovoltaics; thiohydantoin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32365787 PMCID: PMC7254308 DOI: 10.3390/ma13092065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Chemical structures of the examined compounds.
Predicted molecular and electronic properties of the studied compounds.
| Compound | π-Spacer/ | π-spacer/ | Dipole | EHOMO teo | ELUMO teo | λICT teo | λπ–π* teo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 32.8 | 16.0 | 8.2 | −5.34 | −2.80 | 398 | 275 |
|
| 56.2 | 34.8 | 7.4 | −5.35 | −2.80 | 400 | 285 |
|
| 83.1 | 53.4 | 6.8 | −5.38 | −2.81 | 431 | 290 |
|
| 32.7 | 18.0 | 6.6 | −5.34 | −2.81 | 399 | 276 |
|
| 56.2 | 34.2 | 5.8 | −5.35 | −2.82 | 401 | 285 |
|
| 76.4 | 53.0 | 5.2 | −5.37 | −2.83 | 438 | 293 |
Figure 2Visualization of HOMO and LUMO orbitals calculated for the examined molecules.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammetry of 2 × 10−3 M solutions of the studied compounds in DCM/(n-Bu)4NPF6 (blue curves) and THF/(n-Bu)4NPF6 (red curves); scan rate 0.1 V/s.
The numerical data of the cyclic voltammetry measurements.
| Compound | Eox DCM | IP | EHOMO | Ered DCM | Ered THF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 32.8 | 16.0 | 8.2 | −5.34 | −1.86 |
|
| 56.2 | 34.8 | 7.4 | −5.35 | −1.79 |
|
| 83.1 | 53.4 | 6.8 | −5.38 | −1.84 |
|
| 32.7 | 18.0 | 6.6 | −5.34 | −1.65 |
|
| 56.2 | 34.2 | 5.8 | −5.35 | −1.14 |
|
| 76.4 | 53.0 | 5.2 | −5.37 | −1.34 |
Figure 4Absorption spectra of 1a–2c (a) in DCM (normalized, inset: zoom on the visible absorption range); (b) in EtOH; (c) adsorbed on TiO2 (normalized, inset: zoom on the visible absorption range).
Optical properties of the studied compounds.
| Compound | λICT | λπ–π* | λabs onset | Eg opt | ELUMO opt | λICT | λπ–π* | εICT | λICT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCM | EtOH | TiO2 | |||||||
|
| 419 | 301 | 488 | 2.54 | −3.01 | 417 | 298 | 87100 | 441 |
|
| 402 | 305 | 486 | 2.55 | −2.99 | 413 | 301 | 61600 | 416 |
|
| 431 | 306 | 501 | 2.47 | −3.12 | 413 | 303 | 45700 | 443 |
|
| 422 | 302 | 492 | 2.52 | −3.02 | 426 | 296 | 66100 | 425 |
|
| 404 | 304 | 488 | 2.54 | −3.03 | 433 | 301 | 49100 | 431 |
|
| 434 | 305 | 505 | 2.46 | −3.12 | 421 | 300 | 39600 | 453 |
Figure 5Internal power conversion efficiency chart.
Figure 6J–V characteristics of the fabricated solar cells.
The numerical data of the cyclic voltammetry measurements.
| Compound | JSC | VOC | FF | PCE | Dye Loading | R1 | R2 | R3 | τ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.34 | 585 | 72.5 | 1.42 | 0.64 | 20.3 | 3.3 | 145.5 | 4.3 |
|
| 1.17 | 592 | 70.8 | 0.49 | 2.02 | 17.7 | 20.2 | 253.5 | 7.5 |
|
| 1.41 | 519 | 69.2 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 13.0 | 4.9 | 304.0 | 4.3 |
|
| 5.97 | 607 | 71.4 | 2.59 | 51.40 | 26.0 | 17.8 | 50.2 | 2.4 |
|
| 5.82 | 604 | 72.2 | 2.54 | 35.72 | 24.4 | 4.4 | 68.0 | 5.7 |
|
| 4.85 | 580 | 71.1 | 2.00 | 24.68 | 17.5 | 5.0 | 108.6 | 4.3 |
Figure 7Fitted Nyquist plots of impedance spectra of the DSSC devices.
Figure 8Bode phase plot under VOC forward bias conditions.