| Literature DB >> 32365750 |
Jocelyn Blanca Esthela Hernández-Castillo1, Aurea Bernardino-Nicanor2, María de Los Ángeles Vivar-Vera3, José Luis Montañez-Soto4, Gerardo Teniente-Martínez2, José Mayolo Simitrio Juárez-Goiz2, Leopoldo González-Cruz2.
Abstract
The inflorescences of Chamaedorea tepejilote Liebm. are consumed as food in Central America and southern Mexico but is an underutilized food because of its sensory characteristics, principally due to its bitter taste. However, the inflorescences of Chamaedorea tepejilote Liebm. are nutritionally promising due to their high protein content (approximately 25%). Protein isolates from pacaya were modified via three different thermal treatments to determine the effect of the treatments on the protein structures. Scanning electron microscopy indicated that the pacaya protein isolate particles had less rough and irregular surfaces with larger particle sizes due to an aggregation process when a thermal treatment was used compared to those when no thermal treatment was used. An increase in the intensity of the low molecular weight protein fractions (≤20 kDa) in the electrophoretic pattern of the proteins was observed, which was generated by the hydrolysis of the proteins by heat treatment. The modifications in the FT-IR spectra showed that thermal treatment of pacaya affected the secondary structure of its proteins, mainly when microwave treatment was used. Raman spectroscopy revealed that the α-helical structure was dominant in the proteins of pacaya and that thermal treatment increased the fraction of the β-sheet structure at the expense of the α-helical structure.Entities:
Keywords: pacaya; protein modification; thermal treatment
Year: 2020 PMID: 32365750 PMCID: PMC7285206 DOI: 10.3390/polym12051016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Chemical composition of the pacaya protein isolates obtained of flour with different thermal treatments.
| Previous Thermal Treatment | Protein | Moisture (%) | Lipid | Ash | * Carbohydrates (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without thermal treatment | 75.27 ± 2.03 d | 4.00 ± 0.33 d | 0.59 ± 0.07 a | 5.67 ± 0.34 a | 14.55 c |
| Hydrothermal processing | 76.46 ± 3.45 a | 4.15 ± 0.41 b | 0.56 ± 0.08 c | 4.25 ± 0.41 d | 14.80 b |
| Steaming at elevated pressure | 75.51 ± 3.85 c | 4.09 ± 0.15 c | 0.55 ± 0.08 d | 4.75 ± 0.75 c | 15.25 a |
| Microwave process | 75.96 ± 5.25 b | 4.23 ± 0.27 a | 0.58 ± 0.09 b | 5.50 ± 0.33 b | 13.90 d |
Different letters in each column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. * Determined by difference.
Figure 1SEM micrograph of pacaya protein isolate (a) extracted from pacaya without thermal treatment; (b) extracted from pacaya under hydrothermal processing; (c) extracted from pacaya via steaming at an elevated temperature; (d) extracted from pacaya under microwave treatment.
Figure 2Effect of thermal treatment on the SDS-PAGE pattern of pacaya proteins in (a) pacaya flour; (b) pacaya protein isolate. Lanes: M: molecular weight marker, 1: extracted from pacaya without thermal treatment, 2: extracted from pacaya under hydrothermal processing, 3: extracted from pacaya via steaming at an elevated temperature, 4: extracted from pacaya under microwave treatment.
Figure 3FT-IR patterns of pacaya protein isolates (a) extracted from pacaya without thermal treatment; (b) extracted from pacaya under hydrothermal processing; (c) extracted from pacaya via steaming at an elevated temperature; (d) extracted from pacaya under microwave treatment.
Figure 4FT-Raman spectra of pacaya protein isolates (a) extracted from pacaya without thermal treatment; (b) extracted from pacaya under hydrothermal processing; (c) extracted from pacaya via steaming at an elevated temperature; (d) extracted from pacaya under microwave treatment.