David Y Graham1, Yamil Canaan2, James Maher3, Gregory Wiener4, Kristina G Hulten1, Ira N Kalfus5. 1. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (D.Y.G., K.G.H.). 2. Jesscan Medical Research, Miami, Florida (Y.C.). 3. BI Research Center, Houston, Texas (J.M.). 4. GW Research, Inc., Chula Vista, California (G.W.). 5. Independent Consultant to Pharmaceutical companies, New York, New York (I.N.K.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although consensus supports eradication of Helicobacter pylori infections, antimicrobial resistance has substantially reduced eradication rates with most current therapies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a novel rifabutin-based therapy (RHB-105) for H pylori eradication. DESIGN: Phase 3, double-blind trial (ERADICATE Hp2). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03198507). SETTING: 55 clinical research sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 455 treatment-naive adults with epigastric discomfort and confirmed H pylori infection. INTERVENTION: RHB-105 (amoxicillin, 3 g; omeprazole, 120 mg; and rifabutin, 150 mg) versus active comparator (amoxicillin, 3 g, and omeprazole, 120 mg), given as 4 capsules every 8 hours for 14 days. MEASUREMENTS: Between-group difference for H pylori eradication rate, demonstrated by 13C urea breath test 4 weeks after treatment, analyzed by using the χ2 test. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population, the eradication rate was higher with RHB-105 than with the active comparator (228 vs. 227 patients, respectively; 83.8% [95% CI, 78.4% to 88.0%] vs. 57.7% [95% CI, 51.2% to 64.0%]; P < 0.001). Eradication rates were unaffected by resistance to clarithromycin or metronidazole. No rifabutin resistance was detected. The most commonly reported adverse events (incidence ≥5%) were diarrhea (10.1% with RHB-105 vs. 7.9% with active comparator), headache (7.5% vs. 7.0%), and nausea (4.8% vs. 5.3%). LIMITATION: Persons of Asian descent were excluded because of their higher prevalence of poor cytochrome P450 2C19 metabolizers. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest potential for RHB-105 as first-line empirical H pylori therapy, addressing an unmet need in the current environment of increasing antibiotic resistance. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: RedHill Biopharma Ltd.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although consensus supports eradication of Helicobacter pyloriinfections, antimicrobial resistance has substantially reduced eradication rates with most current therapies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a novel rifabutin-based therapy (RHB-105) for H pylori eradication. DESIGN: Phase 3, double-blind trial (ERADICATE Hp2). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03198507). SETTING: 55 clinical research sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 455 treatment-naive adults with epigastric discomfort and confirmed H pylori infection. INTERVENTION: RHB-105 (amoxicillin, 3 g; omeprazole, 120 mg; and rifabutin, 150 mg) versus active comparator (amoxicillin, 3 g, and omeprazole, 120 mg), given as 4 capsules every 8 hours for 14 days. MEASUREMENTS: Between-group difference for H pylori eradication rate, demonstrated by 13C urea breath test 4 weeks after treatment, analyzed by using the χ2 test. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population, the eradication rate was higher with RHB-105 than with the active comparator (228 vs. 227 patients, respectively; 83.8% [95% CI, 78.4% to 88.0%] vs. 57.7% [95% CI, 51.2% to 64.0%]; P < 0.001). Eradication rates were unaffected by resistance to clarithromycin or metronidazole. No rifabutin resistance was detected. The most commonly reported adverse events (incidence ≥5%) were diarrhea (10.1% with RHB-105 vs. 7.9% with active comparator), headache (7.5% vs. 7.0%), and nausea (4.8% vs. 5.3%). LIMITATION: Persons of Asian descent were excluded because of their higher prevalence of poor cytochrome P450 2C19 metabolizers. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest potential for RHB-105 as first-line empirical H pylori therapy, addressing an unmet need in the current environment of increasing antibiotic resistance. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: RedHill Biopharma Ltd.
Authors: Pedro Cortés; Alfred D Nelson; Yan Bi; Fernando F Stancampiano; Loren P Murray; George G A Pujalte; Victoria Gomez; Dana M Harris Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2021 Jan-Dec
Authors: Kristina G Hulten; Robert M Genta; Ira N Kalfus; Yi Zhou; Hongjun Zhang; David Y Graham Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 33.883
Authors: Paula Roszczenko-Jasińska; Marta Ilona Wojtyś; Elżbieta K Jagusztyn-Krynicka Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Anoja W Gunaratne; Harrison Hamblin; Annabel Clancy; Aleja Jane Marie C Magat; Marie Vic M Dawson; Jeffrey Tu; Thomas J Borody Journal: Helicobacter Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 5.753