Literature DB >> 32365007

Membrane bioreactor and rapid sand filtration for the removal of microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant.

Javier Bayo1, Joaquín López-Castellanos2, Sonia Olmos2.   

Abstract

This paper discusses about the role of two different wastewater treatment technologies in the abatement of microplastics (MPs) from the final effluent of an urban wastewater treatment plant (WWTP); i.e., membrane bioreactor technology (MBR) and rapid sand filtration (RSF). For this purpose, a WWTP with these two technologies was monitored for 18 months. The average microplastic concentration was 4.40 ± 1.01 MP L-1 for the influent, 0.92 ± 0.21 MP L-1 for MBR, and 1.08 ± 0.28 MP L-1 for RSF, without statistically significant differences for MPs removal between both technologies (F-test = 0.195, p = 0.661). The main MP forms isolated in our study were fibers (1.34 ± 0.23 items L-1), followed by films (0.59 ± 0.24 items L-1), fragments (0.20 ± 0.09 items L-1), and beads (0.02 ± 0.01 items L-1). All of them probed to be statistically significant reduced after both technologies, but without statistically significant differences between them. The MP removal efficiency was 79.01% and 75.49% for MBR and RSF, respectively, although higher for microplastic particulate forms (MPPs), 98.83% and 95.53%, than for fibers, 57.65% and 53.83% for MBR and RSF, respectively, displaying a selective removal of particulate forms against microfibers. Fourteen different plastic polymers were identified in the influent, only persisting low-density polyethylene (LDPE), nylon (NYL), and polyvinyl (PV) in RSF effluent, and melamine (MUF) after MBR treatment. The MP size ranged from 210 μm, corresponding to NYL fragment form in the influent, to 6.3 mm, corresponding to a red microfiber also from the influent. The maximum MP average size significantly decreased from MBR (1.39 ± 0.15 mm), to RSF (1.15 ± 0.08 mm) and influent (1.05 ± 0.05 mm) (F-test = 4.014, p = 0.019), exhibiting the fiber selection carried out by these advanced technologies for wastewater treatment.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MBR; Microplastics; RSF; Wastewater treatment plant

Year:  2020        PMID: 32365007     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  6 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in aqueous virus removal technologies.

Authors:  Hussein E Al-Hazmi; Hanieh Shokrani; Amirhossein Shokrani; Karam Jabbour; Otman Abida; Seyed Soroush Mousavi Khadem; Sajjad Habibzadeh; Shirish H Sonawane; Mohammad Reza Saeb; Adrián Bonilla-Petriciolet; Michael Badawi
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 8.943

2.  A Low-Cost Microfluidic Method for Microplastics Identification: Towards Continuous Recognition.

Authors:  Pedro Mesquita; Liyuan Gong; Yang Lin
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.523

3.  Semi-crystalline microplastics in wastewater plant effluents and removal efficiencies of post-treatment filtration systems.

Authors:  Hajo Bitter; Leonie Krause; Franziska Kirchen; Thomas Fundneider; Susanne Lackner
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2022-09-20

4.  Efficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) for Microplastic Removal: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Antonio Cristaldi; Maria Fiore; Pietro Zuccarello; Gea Oliveri Conti; Alfina Grasso; Ilenia Nicolosi; Chiara Copat; Margherita Ferrante
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Microplastics in Ecosystems: From Current Trends to Bio-Based Removal Strategies.

Authors:  Solange Magalhães; Luís Alves; Bruno Medronho; Anabela Romano; Maria da Graça Rasteiro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  A review of the cost and effectiveness of solutions to address plastic pollution.

Authors:  Josiane Nikiema; Zipporah Asiedu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.190

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.