| Literature DB >> 32364173 |
Hyun-Kyu Kang1, Ki-Han Kim2, Jin-Su Ahn2, Hong-Bae Kim3, Jeong-Han Yi2, Hyung-Sik Kim2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microscopic image analysis based on image processing is required for quantitative evaluation of decellularization. Existing methods are not widely used because of expensive commercial software, and machine learning-based techniques lack generality for decellularization because many high-resolution image data has to be processed.Entities:
Keywords: Segmentation; decellularization; image process; microscope image
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32364173 PMCID: PMC7369084 DOI: 10.3233/THC-209041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Health Care ISSN: 0928-7329 Impact factor: 1.285
Figure 1.Flow of the proposed image processing algorithm for segmentation and quantification of cell and tissue from microscopic images.
Figure 2.Flowchart of the proposed image segmentation method.
Figure 3.Illustration of the procedures for the experimental protocol.
Figure 4.Extracted cell and tissue images from colored microscopic images with different brightness. (A) is high brightness, (D) is medium brightness, (G) is relatively darker brightness than (A) and (D). (B), (E), (H) are extracted cells and (C), (F), (I) are segmented tissue images.
Figure 5.Results of Gaussian-weighted image and comparison of cell extraction. (A) is a raw-colored image with high-intensity tissue regions. (B) is the result of recognition of tissue as a cell by high-intensity tissue regions. (C) shows the error correction by the Gaussian-weighted method.
Figure 6.Applied voltage and current pulse waveforms used for the electroporation method.
Number of cells and absolute percentage error over time before and after decellularization
| Naive | 1 hr | 2 hr | 5 hr | 8 hr | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 volts/cm | N, n | 38, 38 | 36, 34 | 31, 31 | 15, 15 | 13, 13 |
| % Abs. Err | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 200 volts/cm | N, n | 22, 24 | 22, 22 | 18, 18 | 8, 8 | 5, 5 |
| % Abs. Err | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 280 volts/cm | N, n | 31, 33 | 28, 29 | 20, 19 | 12, 12 | 9, 9 |
| % Abs. Err | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
N: number of cells after image processing, n: number of cells counted directly.
Changes in cell and tissue area according electric voltage and time after electroporation (Unit: %)
| Naive | 1 hr | 2 hr | 5 hr | 8 hr | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 volts/cm | Cell area | 3.12 | 2.98 | 2.46 | 1.60 | 1.39 |
| Tissue area | 93.83 | 93.01 | 92.88 | 92.41 | 90.36 | |
| 200 volts/cm | Cell area | 4.91 | 4.57 | 4.01 | 2.46 | 1.87 |
| Tissue area | 93.11 | 91.24 | 89.86 | 89.10 | 87.47 | |
| 280 volts/cm | Cell area | 3.98 | 3.66 | 2.47 | 1.09 | 0.76 |
| Tissue area | 94.37 | 92.89 | 91.17 | 87.47 | 84.34 |