Literature DB >> 32363804

Three-dimensional printing of extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimicking scaffolds: A critical review of the current ECM materials.

Kate Da Silva1, Pradeep Kumar1, Yahya E Choonara1, Lisa C du Toit1, Viness Pillay1.   

Abstract

The loss of tissues and organs through injury and disease has stimulated the development of therapeutics that have the potential to regenerate and replace the affected tissue. Such therapeutics have the benefit of reducing the reliance and demand for life-saving organ transplants. Of the several regenerative strategies, 3D printing has emerged as the forerunner in regenerative attempts due to the fact that biologically and anatomically correct 3D structures can be fabricated according to the specified need. Despite the progress in this field, improvement is still limited by the difficulty in fabricating scaffolds that adequately mimic the native cellular microenvironment. In response, despite the complexities of the native extracellular matrix (ECM), the inclusion of ECM components into bioinks has emerged as a cutting-edge research area in terms of providing possible ECM-mimicking abilities of the 3D printed constructs. Furthermore, the development of ECM-mimicking scaffolds can potentially assist in improving personalized patient treatments. This review provides a critical analysis of selected naturally occurring ECM components as well as synthetic self-assembling peptides in their ability to provide the required ECM microenvironment for tissue regeneration. The success and possible short comings of each material, as well as the specific characteristics of each bioink, are evaluated.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; ECM-mimicking scaffolds/materials; extracellular matrix; regenerative medicine; tissue engineering

Year:  2020        PMID: 32363804     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  6 in total

Review 1.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chun-Yang Zhang; Chao-Ping Fu; Xiong-Ya Li; Xiao-Chang Lu; Long-Ge Hu; Ranjith Kumar Kankala; Shi-Bin Wang; Ai-Zheng Chen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Recent Advances in 3D Printing with Protein-Based Inks.

Authors:  Xuan Mu; Francesca Agostinacchio; Ning Xiang; Ying Pei; Yousef Khan; Chengchen Guo; Peggy Cebe; Antonella Motta; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 29.190

Review 3.  Is extracellular matrix (ECM) a promising scaffold biomaterial for bone repair?

Authors:  Ranli Gu; Hao Liu; Yuan Zhu; Xuenan Liu; Siyi Wang; Yunsong Liu
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 4.  Multifunctional microfluidic chip for cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Qiao-Ru Guo; Ling-Ling Zhang; Ji-Fang Liu; Zhen Li; Jia-Jun Li; Wen-Min Zhou; Hui Wang; Jing-Quan Li; Da-Yu Liu; Xi-Yong Yu; Jian-Ye Zhang
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2021-01-01

5.  Cellular Interaction of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Polymer and Hydrogel 3D Microscaffold Templates.

Authors:  Beatriz N L Costa; Ricardo M R Adão; Christian Maibohm; Angelo Accardo; Vanessa F Cardoso; Jana B Nieder
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  Development of Silk Fibroin Scaffolds by Using Indirect 3D-Bioprinting Technology.

Authors:  Yeong-Jin Choi; Dong-Woo Cho; Hyungseok Lee
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.891

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.