Literature DB >> 32363333

A real-time dashboard of clinical trials for COVID-19.

Kristian Thorlund1, Louis Dron1, Jay Park2, Grace Hsu1, Jamie I Forrest2, Edward J Mills1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32363333      PMCID: PMC7195288          DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30086-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Digit Health        ISSN: 2589-7500


× No keyword cloud information.
In response to the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency, clinical trial research assessing the efficacy and safety of clinical candidate interventions to treat COVID-19 are emerging at an unprecedented rate. As of April 21, 2020, well over 500 clinical trials have been registered at the various international and national clinical trial registry sites. Findings from randomised clinical trials that have been published as of April 21, 2020, have investigated the efficacy of lopinavir–ritonavir compared with standard of care, hydroxychloroquine compared with best supportive care, favipiravir compared with arbidol, and lopinavir–ritonavir compared with arbidol. Other non-randomised trials have investigated hydroxychloroquine versus hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin. Over 300 trials are enrolling participants and cover further investigations of the above drugs and promising therapies such as remdesivir, IL-6 inhibitors (tocilizumab and sarilumab), convalescent plasma therapy, stem-cell transfusion, vaccine candidates, several other well known direct acting antiv irals, and traditional Chinese medicines. Most of these trials will offer comparative efficacy data versus standard of care according to local COVID-19 treatment guidelines, but a handful of randomised controlled trials will also provide head-to-head evidence between high profile interventions. The figure shows the network of completed, ongoing, and planned COVID-19 interventional clinical trials of these interventions or intervention groups that are being explored in at least two trials.
Figure

Evidence network of COVID-19 clinical trials of top 15 interventions

Circles (node) represent interventions or intervention groups (categories). Lines between two circles indicate comparisons in clinical trials. The numbers on the lines are the number of clinical trials making the specific comparison. Circular arrows and numbers indicate the number of non-comparative clinical trials in which that intervention is included. A few trials examining combination therapies are excluded from the figure due to space limitations. COVID-19=coronavirus disease 2019. LPV/r (lopinivir–ritonavir). *Includes trials on hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine.

Evidence network of COVID-19 clinical trials of top 15 interventions Circles (node) represent interventions or intervention groups (categories). Lines between two circles indicate comparisons in clinical trials. The numbers on the lines are the number of clinical trials making the specific comparison. Circular arrows and numbers indicate the number of non-comparative clinical trials in which that intervention is included. A few trials examining combination therapies are excluded from the figure due to space limitations. COVID-19=coronavirus disease 2019. LPV/r (lopinivir–ritonavir). *Includes trials on hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. Given the accelerated rate at which trial information and findings are emerging, an urgent need exists to track clinical trials, avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts, and understand what trials are being done and where. In response, we have developed a COVID-19 clinical trials registry to collate all trials. Data are pulled from the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, including those from the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical Research Information Service - Republic of Korea, EU Clinical Trials Register, ISRCTN, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, Japan Primary Registries Network, and German Clinical Trials Register. Both automated and manual searches are done to ensure minimisation of duplicated entries and for appropriateness to the research questions. Identified studies are then manually reviewed by two separate reviewers before being entered into the registry. Concurrently, we have developed artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods for data searches to identify potential clinical studies not captured in trial registries. These methods provide estimates of the likelihood of importance of a study being included in our database, such that the study can then be reviewed manually for inclusion. Use of AI-based methods saves 50–80% of the time required to manually review all entries without loss of accuracy. Finally, we will use content aggregator services, such as LitCovid, to ensure our data acquisition strategy is complete. With this three-step process, the probability of missing important publications is greatly diminished and so the resulting data are representative of global COVID-19 research efforts. Trials for COVID-19 are then mapped according to geographical, trial, patient, and intervention characteristics, when these data are available. These data are stored securely in a backend database and outputs are visualised on a front-end feature. As trial findings are communicated, these data must be centralised and meta-analysed in real-time. Syntheses of these trials are urgently needed to assist clinicians, researchers, and policy makers to make evidence-informed decisions to minimise the morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19.
  77 in total

1.  A concern about survival time as an endpoint in coronavirus disease 2019 clinical trials.

Authors:  Kay See Tan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Retrieval and Investigation of Data on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Using Bioinformatics Approach.

Authors:  Muhamad Fahmi; Viol Dhea Kharisma; Arif Nur Muhammad Ansori; Masahiro Ito
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Use of repurposed and adjuvant drugs in hospital patients with covid-19: multinational network cohort study.

Authors:  Albert Prats-Uribe; Anthony G Sena; Lana Yin Hui Lai; Waheed-Ul-Rahman Ahmed; Heba Alghoul; Osaid Alser; Thamir M Alshammari; Carlos Areia; William Carter; Paula Casajust; Dalia Dawoud; Asieh Golozar; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Paras P Mehta; Mengchun Gong; Daniel R Morales; Fredrik Nyberg; Jose D Posada; Martina Recalde; Elena Roel; Karishma Shah; Nigam H Shah; Lisa M Schilling; Vignesh Subbian; David Vizcaya; Lin Zhang; Ying Zhang; Hong Zhu; Li Liu; Jaehyeong Cho; Kristine E Lynch; Michael E Matheny; Seng Chan You; Peter R Rijnbeek; George Hripcsak; Jennifer Ce Lane; Edward Burn; Christian Reich; Marc A Suchard; Talita Duarte-Salles; Kristin Kostka; Patrick B Ryan; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-05-11

4.  Computational Identification of Potential Anti-Inflammatory Natural Compounds Targeting the p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK): Implications for COVID-19-Induced Cytokine Storm.

Authors:  Seth O Asiedu; Samuel K Kwofie; Emmanuel Broni; Michael D Wilson
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  Clinical trials in a COVID-19 pandemic: Shared infrastructure for continuous learning in a rapidly changing landscape.

Authors:  Haley Hedlin; Ariadna Garcia; Yingjie Weng; Ziyuan He; Vandana Sundaram; Bryan Bunning; Vidhya Balasubramanian; Kristen Cunanan; Kristopher Kapphahn; Santosh Gummidipundi; Natasha Purington; Mary Boulos; Manisha Desai
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Changes in the Scientific Information Environment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Importance of Scientific Situational Awareness in Responding to the Infodemic.

Authors:  John K Iskander; Katherine M Bianchi
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2020-12-17

7.  The G-Quadruplex/Helicase World as a Potential Antiviral Approach Against COVID-19.

Authors:  Nadia Panera; Alberto Eugenio Tozzi; Anna Alisi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Studies of Novel Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Global Analysis of Literature.

Authors:  Bach Xuan Tran; Giang Hai Ha; Long Hoang Nguyen; Giang Thu Vu; Men Thi Hoang; Huong Thi Le; Carl A Latkin; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Can the COVID-19 Pandemic Disrupt the Current Drug Development Practices?

Authors:  Jung-Hyun Won; Howard Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Repurposing of Mycobacterium indicus pranii for the severe form of COVID-19 patients in India: A cohort study.

Authors:  Naveed Nazir Shah; Khurshid Ahmad Dar; Syed Quibtiya; Aaliya Mohi Ud Din Azad; Mehvish Mushtaq; Showkeen Muzamil Bashir; Muzafar Ahmad Rather; Sofi Imtiyaz Ali; Wajid Mohammad Sheikh; Showkat Ul Nabi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 20.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.