Literature DB >> 32363127

FLT3LG - a biomarker reflecting clinical responses to the immunogenic cell death inducer oxaliplatin.

Jonathan G Pol1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Julie Le Naour1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Guido Kroemer1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11.   

Abstract

The fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) ligand (FLT3LG) binds to FLT3 on dendritic cells to stimulate their differentiation and expansion, hence facilitating tumor antigen cross-presentation and anticancer immune responses. A recent study by Abrahamsson et al. demonstrates that, in patients receiving a hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin for the treatment of colorectal cancer metastases, an increase in circulating FLT3LG predicts long-term survival of those individuals whose metastases have been rendered resectable. Thus, FLT3LG constitutes a potential biomarker of immune activation by immunogenic cell death-inducing chemotherapeutics such as oxaliplatin. Abbreviations: DC, dendritic cell; FLT3, fms-related tyrosine kinase 3; FLT3LG, FLT3 ligand; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; OXA, oxaliplatin.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunogenic cell death; biomarker; colorectal cancer; dendritic cells; flt3g

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32363127      PMCID: PMC7185211          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1755214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Editorial

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) refers to a type of cellular demise (usually by apoptosis), that, rather than being tolerogenic, elicits an adaptive immune response against antigens of the dying entity. ICD has been described in cancer cells following cytotoxic or cytolytic interventions such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy or oncolytic virotherapy.[1] The mechanisms of ICD involve the release and surface exposure of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that attract antigen-capturing immune sentinels such as dendritic cells (DCs). Activation of recruited DCs within the tumor bed ignites their migration to the secondary lymphoid organs (or alternatively their movement to tertiary lymphoid structures within the tumor) where they cross-present tumor antigens to T lymphocytes, thus priming an antitumor response. Not only tumor-specific CD8+ T cells can eliminate residual cancer cells spared by the treatment, but they also generate an immune memory compartment that can protect from tumor recurrence.[1-3] A series of DAMPs and cytokines has been characterized upon chemotherapy as hallmarks of ICD. They include calreticulin (CALR) exposure on the outer layer of the plasma membrane, the release of the nucleotide ATP and of the proteins high–mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and annexin A1 (ANXA1) into the tumor microenvironment, as well as the production of type I interferons (IFN) and of chemokines like C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10).[1-4] In vitro screening for these hallmarks, in vivo vaccination experiments, as well as comparisons of anticancer drug effects in immunocompetent versus immunodeficient hosts, led to the identification of several pharmaceutical agents capable of inducing ICD.[5-7] Such ICD inducers include the platinum salt oxaliplatin (OXA), anthracyclines such as doxorubicin (DOX) or daunorubicin (DAU), as well as the alkylating agent cyclophosphamide.[4] Of note, certain chemotherapies that do not produce the whole spectrum of ICD hallmarks can complement each other to stimulate bona fide ICD. For instance, cisplatin (CDDP) fails to elicit ICD as it is unable to trigger the endoplasmic reticulum stress module responsible for CALR translocation to the plasma membrane. However, a combination of CDDP with the ER stress inducers thapsigargin or tunicamycin facilitated CRT exposure at the cancer cell surface, resulting in the induction of full-blown ICD and superior therapeutic efficacy.[8] Thus, preclinical studies have proven the that ICD-inducing chemotherapeutics are de facto immunotherapeutics and that the induction of anticancer immune responses is indispensable for the long-term efficacy of any kind of antineoplastic treatment. Cumulative evidence supports the translation of the concept of ICD to the clinics. First, variations of the expression level of ICD-related DAMPs and receptors, as well as loss-of-function mutations affecting the corresponding signaling cascades, have prognostic and predictive impact.[9,10] For example, formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) is expressed on DCs and detects the DAMP ANXA1. Upon OXA-based chemotherapy, colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that are homozygous for a loss-of-function allele of FPR1 exhibit shorter progression-free and overall survival than subjects harboring one or two copies of the wild-type allele. Similarly, breast cancer patients receiving an anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy have a poor prognosis when they bear one or two copies of the FPR1 loss-of-function allele.
Figure 1.

Serum FLT3LG as a prognostic biomarker of ICD-induced systemic anticancer immunity in colorectal cancer.

The level of circulating FLT3LG reflects a tumor-specific immune response invoked by first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (OXA) in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CLM). Subjects could be segregated in 3 groups. First, patients in which OXA failed to convert CLM to resectable disease showed a limited (<2 fold baseline), slow and transient increase of serum FLT3LG. Second, some patients with technically resectable CLM presented a limited (<2 fold baseline), slow but gradual rise of FLT3LG. These two kinetics of serum FLT3LG reflected a bad prognosis with no survivors at censoring. In contrast, all patients of the third group, who remained alive after 8 to 12 years of follow-up after successful resection of CML exhibited a strong (>2 fold baseline), rapid and sustained elevation of serum FLT3LG. Thus, assessment of serum FLT3LG may be used to improve the selection of OXA-treated CLM patients for a curative-intent ablation procedure. FLT3LG, fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand; ICD, immunogenic cell death.

Serum FLT3LG as a prognostic biomarker of ICD-induced systemic anticancer immunity in colorectal cancer. The level of circulating FLT3LG reflects a tumor-specific immune response invoked by first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (OXA) in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CLM). Subjects could be segregated in 3 groups. First, patients in which OXA failed to convert CLM to resectable disease showed a limited (<2 fold baseline), slow and transient increase of serum FLT3LG. Second, some patients with technically resectable CLM presented a limited (<2 fold baseline), slow but gradual rise of FLT3LG. These two kinetics of serum FLT3LG reflected a bad prognosis with no survivors at censoring. In contrast, all patients of the third group, who remained alive after 8 to 12 years of follow-up after successful resection of CML exhibited a strong (>2 fold baseline), rapid and sustained elevation of serum FLT3LG. Thus, assessment of serum FLT3LG may be used to improve the selection of OXA-treated CLM patients for a curative-intent ablation procedure. FLT3LG, fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand; ICD, immunogenic cell death. Second, ICD-inducing chemotherapies have demonstrated a positive interaction with immunotherapies. T cell activation consecutive to ICD sensitizes to immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade or interleukin (IL)-2.[11-14] A clinical trial compared two consolidation treatments in acute myeloid leukemia. These regimens consisted of dual immunotherapy with IL-2histamine dihydrochloride after cytarabine-based chemotherapy comprising or not the ICD inducer DAU. Interestingly, higher levels of circulating effector memory CD8+ T cells at the beginning of immunotherapy, together with extended survival, were observed in subjects that received the anthracycline DAU.[11] Moreover, a Phase II trial enrolling patients with triple-negative breast cancer revealed an improved objective response rate in a cohort co-infused with the ICD inducer DOX + the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab (anti-PD-1) over individuals treated with the same ICI + the non ICD chemotherapeutic CDDP.[12] Finally, A.H. Ree’s group recently reported on the prognostic value of circulating levels of the hematopoietic cytokine fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) ligand (FLT3LG) in CRC after OXA-based chemotherapy.[15,16] FLT3LG is produced by stromal cells in the bone marrow and by lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment.[17,18] FLT3LG regulates the differentiation and expansion of conventional and plasmacytoid DCs from most FLT3+ bone marrow progenitors, including both lymphoid and myeloid common progenitors. Moreover, mature DCs express FLT3 and proliferate in the presence of FLT3LG.[19,20] In the clinic, elevation of serum FLT3 has been described as a marker of recovery from chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression.[21,22] In locally advanced CRC, Kalanxhi E. et al observed higher levels of serum FLT3LG at baseline and post-neoadjuvant therapy with OXA in patients with signs of a histologic tumor response.[15] Moreover, elevated levels of circulating FLT3LG post-neoadjuvant treatment strongly correlated with better progression-free survival, mostly due to a reduced risk of metastatic events. In their latest study, Abrahamsson H. et al measured circulating FLT3LG first at baseline and then along the course of 1st-line chemotherapy with OXA in individuals with CRC liver metastases.[16] Treatment consisted of 1 to 3 sequences, each sequence consisting of one hepatic arterial infusion of OXA (complemented with oral capecitabine) every 2 weeks over an 8-week period. Liver metastases that responded to treatment underwent surgical resection. Interestingly, the mean serum level of FLT3LG rose following the 1st sequence of OXA in all patients. This increase of circulating FLT3LG was similar between the two groups of patients stratified according to resectability of CRC liver metastases. Of note, eligibility for surgical removal was associated with wild-type RAS status, rather than the more aggressive RAS mutation. Remarkably, within the resectable category (n = 33/55; 60%), patients that remained alive at the end of the 8 to 12-year follow-up (n = 9/33; 27.7%) demonstrated an immediate and prolonged 2-fold increase of circulating FLT3LG (from 76.5 pg/ml at baseline to 159 pg/ml post-1st sequence of OXA on average). In contrast, mean FLT3LG levels were lower by 40 pg/ml in resected individuals that ultimately succumbed to the disease (n = 24/33; 72.3%).[16] Further investigations should confirm FLT3LG as a prognosis biomarker in CRC. Collectively, accretion of serum FLT3LG reflected the establishment of a systemic anticancer immune response consecutive to OXA-mediated ICD and to supportive DC expansion. Some preclinical investigations have comforted the beneficial role of systemic FLT3LG in sensitizing cancer to immunotherapeutic approaches.[23,24] Nowadays, ICIs targeting the immune checkpoints PD-1, PD-L1 or CTLA-4 represent the most transversal cancer treatment. Nevertheless, only a fraction of patients do benefit from ICI monotherapies due to primary or acquired cancer resistance. Such resistance mechanisms include DC dysfunction or reduced DC recruitment, as well as decreased T cell priming and/or infiltration.[25] These mechanisms of resistance can be overcome by therapeutic agents that induce cancer ICD or facilitate DC recruitment/activation.[23,24,26-36] The main DC subsets involved in cancer immunity are Ly6ChiCD11b+ monocyte-derived DCs and Clec9A+ conventional DCs.[23,24,26,35,37] M. Merad and colleagues showed limited efficacy of anti-PD-L1 therapy in a murine model of melanoma (B16).[23] However, when anti-PD-L1 was combined with repeated infusions of FLT3LG, together with intratumoral administrations of the toll-like receptor 3 agonist poly I:C, tumor growth control was achieved. Mechanistically, systemic FLT3LG triggers the differentiation of CD103+ conventional DCs from bone marrow progenitors, followed by DC expansion and accumulation in the tumor bed. These events favor DC activation upon the capture of tumor antigens and initiate their migration to the draining lymph nodes, where mature DCs efficiently prime CD8+ T cells. Remarkably, the tumor enrichment of DCs not only led to an expansion of effector T lymphocytes but also facilitated their access to the neoplastic core. Interestingly, this tritherapy of anti-PD-L1FLT3LG + poly I:C could synergize with BRAF inhibitors for efficient treatment of BRAF mutated melanoma.[23] Furthermore, FLT3LG + poly I:C can be advantageously combined with ICD-inducing radiotherapy to treat murine A20 lymphomas. This triple combination also sensitized the neoplasm to anti-PD-1 ICI, leading to complete and durable remission in most animals.[23] In a clinical trial, the combination of FLT3LG + poly I:C + radiotherapy was evaluated in 11 patients with indolent B cell lymphoma. The treatment promoted the peripheral expansion of CD8+ T cells, particularly of the naive and exhausted effector memory subsets. At censoring, the best overall responses recorded consisted of one complete and one partial responses, 6 stable and 2 progressive diseases. One more patient with a partial response remained under monitoring. In one subject with a systemic partial response, untreated (abscopal) lesions exhibited an increased infiltration by myeloid cells (mainly DCs and monocytes), as well as by lymphoid cells (notably exhausted CD8+ T cells, as well as naive and memory B cells).[24] In sum, there is overwhelming preclinical and clinical evidence that FLT3LG may be useful for stimulating the anticancer effects of DCs. Whether FLT3LG can overcome stress-induced (glucocorticoid-mediated) DC defects that negatively affect tumor immunosurveillance[38] remains to be determined, it appears that, at least in specific circumstances, circulating FLT3LG levels may constitute a proxy for the assessment of incipient anticancer immune responses ignited by immunogenic chemotherapy. Future studies will have to evaluate whether the assessment of fluctuations in plasma FLT3LG concentrations, alone or in combination with other immune parameters, will yield a clinically useful biomarker for predicting the outcome of anticancer treatments.
  38 in total

1.  Systemic clinical tumor regressions and potentiation of PD1 blockade with in situ vaccination.

Authors:  Linda Hammerich; Thomas U Marron; Ranjan Upadhyay; Judit Svensson-Arvelund; Maxime Dhainaut; Shafinaz Hussein; Yougen Zhan; Dana Ostrowski; Michael Yellin; Henry Marsh; Andres M Salazar; Adeeb H Rahman; Brian D Brown; Miriam Merad; Joshua D Brody
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Aitziber Buqué; Oliver Kepp; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  A natural killer-dendritic cell axis defines checkpoint therapy-responsive tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Kevin C Barry; Joy Hsu; Miranda L Broz; Francisco J Cueto; Mikhail Binnewies; Alexis J Combes; Amanda E Nelson; Kimberly Loo; Raj Kumar; Michael D Rosenblum; Michael D Alvarado; Denise M Wolf; Dusan Bogunovic; Nina Bhardwaj; Adil I Daud; Patrick K Ha; William R Ryan; Joshua L Pollack; Bushra Samad; Saurabh Asthana; Vincent Chan; Matthew F Krummel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Restoration of the immunogenicity of cisplatin-induced cancer cell death by endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Authors:  I Martins; O Kepp; F Schlemmer; S Adjemian; M Tailler; S Shen; M Michaud; L Menger; A Gdoura; N Tajeddine; A Tesniere; L Zitvogel; G Kroemer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Anthracycline-based consolidation may determine outcome of post-consolidation immunotherapy in AML.

Authors:  Johan Aurelius; Lars Möllgård; Roberta Kiffin; Frida Ewald Sander; Staffan Nilsson; Fredrik Bergh Thorén; Kristoffer Hellstrand; Anna Martner
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-04-17

6.  Overall Survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC.

Authors:  Scott J Antonia; Augusto Villegas; Davey Daniel; David Vicente; Shuji Murakami; Rina Hui; Takayasu Kurata; Alberto Chiappori; Ki H Lee; Maike de Wit; Byoung C Cho; Maryam Bourhaba; Xavier Quantin; Takaaki Tokito; Tarek Mekhail; David Planchard; Young-Chul Kim; Christos S Karapetis; Sandrine Hiret; Gyula Ostoros; Kaoru Kubota; Jhanelle E Gray; Luis Paz-Ares; Javier de Castro Carpeño; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Martin Reck; Johan Vansteenkiste; David R Spigel; Catherine Wadsworth; Giovanni Melillo; Maria Taboada; Phillip A Dennis; Mustafa Özgüroğlu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Anticancer chemotherapy-induced intratumoral recruitment and differentiation of antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  Yuting Ma; Sandy Adjemian; Stephen R Mattarollo; Takahiro Yamazaki; Laetitia Aymeric; Heng Yang; João Paulo Portela Catani; Dalil Hannani; Helene Duret; Kim Steegh; Isabelle Martins; Frederic Schlemmer; Mickaël Michaud; Oliver Kepp; Abdul Qader Sukkurwala; Laurie Menger; Erika Vacchelli; Nathalie Droin; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Roman Krzysiek; Siamon Gordon; Philip R Taylor; Peter Van Endert; Eric Solary; Mark J Smyth; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 8.  Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death.

Authors:  Oliver Kepp; Laura Senovilla; Ilio Vitale; Erika Vacchelli; Sandy Adjemian; Patrizia Agostinis; Lionel Apetoh; Fernando Aranda; Vincenzo Barnaba; Norma Bloy; Laura Bracci; Karine Breckpot; David Brough; Aitziber Buqué; Maria G Castro; Mara Cirone; Maria I Colombo; Isabelle Cremer; Sandra Demaria; Luciana Dini; Aristides G Eliopoulos; Alberto Faggioni; Silvia C Formenti; Jitka Fučíková; Lucia Gabriele; Udo S Gaipl; Jérôme Galon; Abhishek Garg; François Ghiringhelli; Nathalia A Giese; Zong Sheng Guo; Akseli Hemminki; Martin Herrmann; James W Hodge; Stefan Holdenrieder; Jamie Honeychurch; Hong-Min Hu; Xing Huang; Tim M Illidge; Koji Kono; Mladen Korbelik; Dmitri V Krysko; Sherene Loi; Pedro R Lowenstein; Enrico Lugli; Yuting Ma; Frank Madeo; Angelo A Manfredi; Isabelle Martins; Domenico Mavilio; Laurie Menger; Nicolò Merendino; Michael Michaud; Gregoire Mignot; Karen L Mossman; Gabriele Multhoff; Rudolf Oehler; Fabio Palombo; Theocharis Panaretakis; Jonathan Pol; Enrico Proietti; Jean-Ehrland Ricci; Chiara Riganti; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Anna Rubartelli; Antonella Sistigu; Mark J Smyth; Juergen Sonnemann; Radek Spisek; John Stagg; Abdul Qader Sukkurwala; Eric Tartour; Andrew Thorburn; Stephen H Thorne; Peter Vandenabeele; Francesca Velotti; Samuel T Workenhe; Haining Yang; Wei-Xing Zong; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 8.110

9.  Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma.

Authors:  A Greystoke; J P B O'Connor; K Linton; M B Taylor; J Cummings; T Ward; F Maders; A Hughes; M Ranson; T M Illidge; J Radford; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition: The Best of Both Worlds.

Authors:  Venkatesh Sivanandam; Christopher J LaRocca; Nanhai G Chen; Yuman Fong; Susanne G Warner
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 7.200

View more
  3 in total

1.  Single-Molecule RNA Sequencing Reveals IFNγ-Induced Differential Expression of Immune Escape Genes in Merkel Cell Polyomavirus-Positive MCC Cell Lines.

Authors:  Tatjana Sauerer; Christopher Lischer; Adrian Weich; Carola Berking; Julio Vera; Jan Dörrie
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Immune Infiltration Characteristics and a Gene Prognostic Signature Associated With the Immune Infiltration in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chunmei Zhu; Qiuji Wu; Ningning Yang; Zhewen Zheng; Fuxiang Zhou; Yunfeng Zhou
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  FLT3LG and IFITM3P6 consolidate T cell activity in the bone marrow microenvironment and are prognostic factors in acute myelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Haiyan Chen; Meng Wu; Hongping Xia; Songjie Du; Guoren Zhou; Guangfeng Long; Yanan Zhu; Xu Huang; Daheng Yang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 8.786

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.