| Literature DB >> 32362979 |
Shunji Suzuki1, Takafumi Kimura2, Sumiko Hara3, Fumihiko Ishimaru4, Minoko Takanashi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) has become an established alternative source of hematopoietic stem cells with marrow and postmobilization peripheral blood. The presence of a large amount of clots may lead to the deterioration of cord blood quality. To improve UCB quality as a source of hematopoietic stem cells in Japan, we examined factors associated with UCB collection methods from the viewpoint of eliminating the presence of clots.Entities:
Keywords: Hematopoietic stem cells; Japan; Single puncture; Umbilical cord blood collection; Umbilical cord blood quality
Year: 2020 PMID: 32362979 PMCID: PMC7188375 DOI: 10.14740/jh628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hematol ISSN: 1927-1212
Results of Univariate Logistic Regression Analyses Concerning the Association Between Possible Factors of UCB Collection Methods and the UCB Quality (Presence or Absence of Clots)
| Factor of UCB collection | Presence of clots | P value | Crude ORs | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||||
| Collection during vaginal delivery only | |||||
| Yes | 1,121 | 407 | 0.67 | 0.963 | 0.82 - 1.1 |
| No | 1,010 | 353 | |||
| Missing data | 0 | 0 | |||
| Clamp the tube to prevent air contamination | |||||
| Yes | 1,379 | 517 | 0.34 | 0.896 | 0.71 - 1.1 |
| No | 333 | 111 | |||
| Missing data | 460 | 136 | |||
| Puncture with needle hole facing up | |||||
| Yes | 1,738 | 154 | 0.03 | 1.47 | 1.0 - 2.0 |
| No | 393 | 51 | |||
| Missing data | 0 | 545 | |||
| Puncture the umbilical cord near the placenta | |||||
| Yes | 1,325 | 567 | < 0.01 | 0.619 | 0.48 - 0.79 |
| No | 351 | 93 | |||
| Missing data | 455 | 100 | |||
| Puncture the thick part of the Walton Jelly | |||||
| Yes | 1,146 | 282 | 0.07 | 1.21 | 0.99 - 1.5 |
| No | 248 | 746 | |||
| Missing data | 737 | 14 | |||
| Single puncture only | |||||
| Yes | 1,307 | 585 | < 0.01 | 1.45 | 1.2 - 1.8 |
| No | 269 | 175 | |||
| Missing data | 555 | 0 | |||
| Continuous massage of the uterine fundus during collection | |||||
| Yes | 1,383 | 509 | 0.19 | 1.16 | 0.93 - 1.5 |
| No | 311 | 133 | |||
| Missing data | 161 | 118 | |||
| Avoid squeezing the umbilical cord | |||||
| Yes | 426 | 18 | < 0.01 | 3.24 | 2.0 - 5.3 |
| No | 1,685 | 212 | |||
| Missing data | 25 | 530 | |||
| Yes | 1,298 | 594 | 0.06 | 1.23 | 0.99 - 1.53 |
| No | 384 | 160 | |||
| Missing data | 549 | 6 | |||
| Continuous stirring of the bag during collection | |||||
| Yes | 1,538 | 354 | 0.09 | 0.691 | 0.42 - 1.1 |
| No | 367 | 75 | |||
| Missing data | 226 | 336 | |||
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; UCB: umbilical cord blood.
Results of Multivariate Logistic Regression Analyses Concerning the Association Between Possible Factors of UCB Collection Methods and the UCB Quality (Presence or Absence of Clots)
| Factor of umbilical cord blood collection | P value | Adjusted ORs | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Puncture the umbilical cord near the placenta | 0.09 | 1.02 | 0.91 - 1.2 |
| Puncture with needle hole facing up | 0.052 | 1.41 | 0.98 - 1.8 |
| Single puncture only | 0.01 | 1.80 | 1.3 - 5.4 |
| Avoid squeezing the umbilical cord | 0.11 | 1.29 | 0.91 - 1.8 |
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; UCB: umbilical cord blood.