| Literature DB >> 32362734 |
Taija Saarela1, Antti J Rissanen2, Anne Ojala3,4,5, Jukka Pumpanen1, Sanni L Aalto1, Marja Tiirola6, Timo Vesala7, Helena Jäntti1.
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems represent a significant natural source of methane (CH4). CH4 produced through anaerobic decomposition of organic matter (OM) in lake sediment and water column can be either oxidized to carbon dioxide (CO2) by methanotrophic microbes or emitted to the atmosphere. While the role of CH4 oxidation as a CH4 sink is widely accepted, neither the magnitude nor the drivers behind CH4 oxidation are well constrained. In this study, we aimed to gain more specific insight into CH4 oxidation in the water column of a seasonally stratified, typical boreal lake, particularly under hypoxic conditions. We used 13CH4 incubations to determine the active CH4 oxidation sites and the potential CH4 oxidation rates in the water column, and we measured environmental variables that could explain CH4 oxidation in the water column. During hypolimnetic hypoxia, 91% of available CH4 was oxidized in the active CH4 oxidation zone, where the potential CH4 oxidation rates gradually increased from the oxycline to the hypolimnion. Our results showed that in warm springs, which become more frequent, early thermal stratification with cold well-oxygenated hypolimnion delays the period of hypolimnetic hypoxia and limits CH4 production. Thus, the delayed development of hypolimnetic hypoxia may partially counteract the expected increase in the lacustrine CH4 emissions caused by the increasing organic carbon load from forested catchments.Entities:
Keywords: Boreal lake; Greenhouse gases; Hypoxia; Methane; Oxidation; Stable isotopes; Stratification
Year: 2019 PMID: 32362734 PMCID: PMC7181431 DOI: 10.1007/s00027-019-0690-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aquat Sci ISSN: 1015-1621 Impact factor: 2.744
Sampling schedule and the measured variables during each sampling of this study in 2016
| Sampling date | Measured variables |
|---|---|
| 25 May | Temperature, pH, the concentrations of O2, CH4 and CO2 |
| 18 July | Temperature, pH, the concentrations of O2, CH4, CO2, NOx−, NH4+ and SO42−, δ13C-CH4, δ13C-DIC |
| 15 August | Temperature, pH, the concentrations of O2, CH4, CO2, NOx−, NH4+, SO42− and DOC, δ13C-CH4, δ13C-DIC, 13C-CH4 oxidation experiment |
| 5 September | Temperature, pH, the concentrations of O2, CH4, CO2, NOx−, NH4+, Fe, SO42−, S2− and DOC, δ13C-CH4, δ13C-DIC, 13C-CH4 oxidation experiment |
Fig. 1Depth profiles of water temperature (°C) and O2 concentration (mg l−1) in a May, b July, c August and d September
Fig. 2Concentrations of NOx−, NH4+ and SO42− in a July, b August and c September, concentrations of DOC in b August and c September, and concentrations of Tot Fe in c September. Note different scales on X-axis
Fig. 3Depth profiles of CH4 and CO2 in a May, b July, c August and d September. Concentrations are presented as averages ± standard deviations (n = 2 or 3)
Spearman’s rank correlations between the average gas concentrations (n = 52) and stable isotopic values (n = 39) of CH4 and CO2, water column depth, temperature, the O2 concentration, pH (n = 52), and the concentrations of DOC (n = 23), NOx−, NH4+, SO42− (n = 39) and Fe3+ (n = 13)
| CH4 −concentration | CO2 concentration | δ13C-CH4 | δ13C-DIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | − 0.490** | 0.884** | n.s | − 0.872** |
| Temperature | 0.638** | − 0.839** | − 0.332* | 0.927** |
| O2 | n.s | − 0.776** | n.s | 0.975** |
| pH | 0.625** | − 0.773** | − 0.347* | 0.813** |
| DOC | n.s | n.s | − 0.444* | n.s |
| NOx− | − 0.403* | 0.519** | n.s | − 0.494** |
| NH4+ | 0.396* | n.s | n.s | n.s |
| SO42− | − 0.330* | 0.705** | 0.351* | − 0.652** |
| Fe3+ | n.s | 0.863** | n.s | − 0.802** |
| CH4 | − 0.462** | − 0.726** | n.s | |
| CO2 | − 0.462** | n.s | − 0.946** |
*Correlation is significant at the p < 0.05 level (2-tailed)
**Correlation is significant at the p < 0.01 level (2-tailed)
Fig. 4Depth profiles of δ13C-CH4 and δ13C-DIC (‰) in a July, b August and c September. Values are presented as averages ± standard deviations (n = 2 or 3)
Fig. 5The O2 concentration (mg l−1) and the potential CH4 oxidation rates (nmol C l−1 d−1) ± standard errors determined with 13C-CH4-tracer in September (n = 18 at the depths of 8 and 11.5 m, and n = 17 at 10 m depth)