Literature DB >> 3236262

Adaptation in chemoreceptor cells. I. Self-adapting backgrounds determine threshold and cause parallel shift of response function.

P F Borroni1, J Atema.   

Abstract

1. The self-adapting effects of chemical backgrounds on the response of primary chemoreceptor cells to superimposed stimuli were studied using lobster (Homarus americanus) NH4 receptor cells. 2. These receptors responded for several seconds to the onset of the backgrounds, and then returned to their initial level of spontaneous activity (usually zero). The strongest response always occurred only during the steepest concentration change; the response then decayed back to zero or to the earlier spontaneous firing level, while the background concentration was still rising, and remained silent during the entire time that the background was maintained constant (20-30 min) 3. Exposure to constant self-adapting backgrounds eliminated the response of NH4 receptor cells to stimuli of concentration lower than the background, and reduced the responses to all higher stimulus concentrations tested by a nearly equal amount. This resulted in a parallel shift of the stimulus-response function to the right along the abscissa. 4. Since the response threshold was completely re-set by adaptation to backgrounds, NH4 receptors seem to function mostly as detectors of relative rather than absolute stimulus intensity across their entire dynamic range: the response to a given stimulus-to-background ratio remained the same over 3 log step increases of background concentration. 5. As in other sensory modalities, a parallel shift of response functions appears to be an important property of chemoreceptor cells, allowing for this sensory system to function over a wider stimulus intensity range than the instantaneous dynamic range of individual receptor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3236262     DOI: 10.1007/bf00612719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  23 in total

Review 1.  Vertebrate olfactory reception.

Authors:  D Lancet
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  Pharmacological receptors.

Authors:  D R Waud
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Cross adaptation between salts in the chorda tympani nerve of the rat.

Authors:  D V Smith; M Frank
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1972-02

4.  Site of gustatory neural adaptation.

Authors:  T Sato
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Effects of continuous noise backgrounds on rate response of auditory nerve fibers in cat.

Authors:  J A Costalupes; E D Young; D J Gibson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Chemoreception in the sea: adaptations of chemoreceptors and behaviour to aquatic stimulus conditions.

Authors:  J Atema
Journal:  Symp Soc Exp Biol       Date:  1985

7.  Adaptation and recovery of the rat chorda tympani response to NaCl.

Authors:  D V Smith; S L Bealer; R L Van Buskirk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-05

8.  A cyclic nucleotide-gated conductance in olfactory receptor cilia.

Authors:  T Nakamura; G H Gold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jan 29-Feb 4       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The role of narrowly tuned taste cell populations in lobster (Homarus americanus) feeding behavior.

Authors:  P F Borroni; L S Handrich; J Atema
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Intracellular recordings from gecko photoreceptors during light and dark adaptation.

Authors:  J Kleinschmidt; J E Dowling
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  11 in total

1.  Temporal analysis of adaptation in moth (Trichoplusia ni) pheromone receptor neurons.

Authors:  P F Borroni; R J O'Connell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Adaptation in chemoreceptor cells. II. The effects of cross-adapting backgrounds depend on spectral tuning.

Authors:  P F Borroni; J Atema
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Micro-scale fluid and odorant transport to antennules of the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii.

Authors:  Swapnil Pravin; DeForest Mellon; Matthew A Reidenbach
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Functional asymmetries in cockroach ON and OFF olfactory receptor neurons.

Authors:  Maria Burgstaller; Harald Tichy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatial distribution of odors in simulated benthic boundary layer flows.

Authors:  P A Moore; M J Weissburg; J M Parrish; R K Zimmer-Faust; G A Gerhardt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Olfactory coding in a simple system: adaptation in Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  M Cobb; I Domain
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Regulation of sex-specific feeding behavior in fiddler crabs: physiological properties of chemoreceptor neurons in claws and legs of males and females.

Authors:  M J Weissburg; C D Derby
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Rising Background Odor Concentration Reduces Sensitivity of ON and OFF Olfactory Receptor Neurons for Changes in Concentration.

Authors:  Maria Hellwig; Harald Tichy
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Simultaneous sampling of flow and odorants by crustaceans can aid searches within a turbulent plume.

Authors:  Swapnil Pravin; Matthew A Reidenbach
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Modulation of the behavioral and electrical responses to the repellent DEET elicited by the pre-exposure to the same compound in Blattella germanica.

Authors:  Valeria Sfara; Gastón A Mougabure-Cueto; Paola A González-Audino
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.