Literature DB >> 32362508

Distributional Changes in U.S. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Purchases, 2002-2014.

Pourya Valizadeh1, Barry M Popkin2, Shu Wen Ng2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: U.S. policy actions focus on reducing sugar-sweetened beverage purchases. Yet, there are no studies on trends in overall purchase distribution and how it has changed by key subpopulations. This study examined changes in distributions of total sugar-sweetened beverage purchases and its major subtypes (regular carbonated soft drinks and fruit/sports/energy drinks) in 2002-2014 and distinguished among low, moderate, and high purchasers.
METHODS: Longitudinal data on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases of U.S. households from the 2002-2014 Nielsen Homescan Panel were used. Sugar-sweetened beverages were defined as all caloric non-alcoholic beverages containing added sugars. Longitudinal quantile regression model examined trends across distributions (from quantile 25 to 95) of purchases (measured in kcal/day/capita), while accounting for households' unobserved differences. All statistical analyses were conducted in 2019.
RESULTS: All households across the total purchase distribution significantly reduced their purchases. High purchasers made less proportional reductions than low purchasers (e.g., 35% at 95th quantile vs 62% at 25th quantile). However, the smaller relative reductions among higher purchasers translated into larger absolute decreases (e.g., 134 kcal/day/capita at 95th quantile vs 23 kcal/day/capita at 25th quantile). Similar patterns in heterogeneity were observed across sugar-sweetened beverage subtype distributions and among racial/ethnic and income groups. In addition, there were significant racial/ethnic and income disparities in total sugar-sweetened beverage purchases in 2002-2003. Although racial/ethnic disparities among higher purchasers improved, income disparity patterns at all purchase levels persisted into 2013-2014.
CONCLUSIONS: From 2002‒2003 to 2013-2014, U.S. households at all purchase levels made meaningful reductions in sugar-sweetened beverage purchases in both absolute and relative terms. Furthermore, racial/ethnic disparities in total sugar-sweetened beverage purchases narrowed, but income disparity patterns persisted.
Copyright © 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32362508      PMCID: PMC7375910          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  41 in total

1.  Low energy reporters vs others: a comparison of reported food intakes.

Authors:  S M Krebs-Smith; B I Graubard; L L Kahle; A F Subar; L E Cleveland; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Effects of drinks sweetened with sucrose or aspartame on hunger, thirst and food intake in men.

Authors:  B J Rolls; S Kim; I C Fedoroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-07

3.  Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in the United States.

Authors:  Jean A Welsh; Andrea J Sharma; Lisa Grellinger; Miriam B Vos
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Ounces of prevention--the public policy case for taxes on sugared beverages.

Authors:  Kelly D Brownell; Thomas R Frieden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Persistent disparities over time in the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage intake among children in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle A Mendez; Donna R Miles; Jennifer M Poti; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Trends in Obesity and Severe Obesity Prevalence in US Youth and Adults by Sex and Age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016.

Authors:  Craig M Hales; Cheryl D Fryar; Margaret D Carroll; David S Freedman; Cynthia L Ogden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Does energy intake underreporting involve all kinds of food or only specific food items? Results from the Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Santé (FLVS) study.

Authors:  L Lafay; L Mennen; A Basdevant; M A Charles; J M Borys; E Eschwège; M Romon
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-11

8.  Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: epidemiologic evidence.

Authors:  Frank B Hu; Vasanti S Malik
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-02-06

9.  Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States.

Authors:  Euna Han; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 10.  Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes.

Authors:  L M Powell; J F Chriqui; T Khan; R Wada; F J Chaloupka
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 9.213

View more
  5 in total

1.  Decomposing consumer and producer effects on sugar from beverage purchases after a sugar-based tax on beverages in South Africa.

Authors:  Maxime Bercholz; Shu Wen Ng; Nicholas Stacey; Elizabeth C Swart
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.774

2.  Linking a sugar-sweetened beverage tax with fruit and vegetable subsidies: A simulation analysis of the impact on the poor.

Authors:  Pourya Valizadeh; Barry M Popkin; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 8.472

3.  Would A National Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax In The United States Be Well Targeted?

Authors:  Pourya Valizadeh; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  Am J Agric Econ       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.757

4.  Are price discounts on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) linked to household SSB purchases? - a cross-sectional study in a large US household and retail scanner database.

Authors:  Yichen Zhong; Amy H Auchincloss; Mark F Stehr; Brent A Langellier
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Secular trends and customer characteristics of sweetened beverage and water purchasing at US convenience and other small food stores, 2014-2017.

Authors:  Megan R Winkler; Kathleen Lenk; Darin Erickson; Melissa N Laska
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.457

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.