Literature DB >> 32362347

Possible Influence of the Route of Treatment Administration on Treatment Adherence in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

Iria Sánchez Martínez1, María Cerdán Sánchez2, Javier López Román3, Francisca Iniesta Martínez3, Ester Carreón-Guarnizo2, Jose-Eustasio Meca Lallana2, Pilar Zafrilla Rentero3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, demyelinating, and degenerative disease of the central nervous system with an immune-based pathologic origin. The present pilot study aimed to assess whether the change in the route of treatment administration is associated with a variation in adherence and whether there is a change in quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and fatigue.
METHODS: Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who were >18 years of age and who used to receive immunomodulatory parenteral treatment and were ready to change administration route were eligible for the study. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months later. Adherence, quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and fatigue were measured via the following questionnaires: Morisky-Green questionnaire on patient-reported medication adherence, Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Instrument, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale.
FINDINGS: The study sample included 30 patients (mean age, 43.2 years; age range, 24-71 years; 60% female and 40% male). There was a significant improvement in adherence (p = 0.048). Mean (SD) physical and mental health quality-of-life summary scores varied from 52.50 (24.15) and 54.13 (21.24) to 67.55 (20.92) and 62.30 (21.75) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, d = -0.426 and d = -0.643, respectively). In the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, an improvement of the score was observed in effectiveness of the medication (p = 0.0041, d = -0.563), adverse effects of the medication (p < 0.001, d = -0.976), convenience of the medication (p < 0.001, d = -1.235), and global satisfaction (p = 0.006, d = -0.725). Patients had a higher mean (SD) score (45.13 [26.7]) on the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale while receiving injectable treatment compared with that obtained with oral treatment (34.86 [23.16]; p = 0.009, d = 0.41). IMPLICATIONS: When the route of administration changed from injectable to oral, there was an increase in adherence, quality of life, and degree of patient satisfaction with their treatment and a decrease in the degree of fatigue.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Fatigue; Multiple sclerosis; Quality of life; Treatment satisfaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32362347     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  1 in total

1.  Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients.

Authors:  Leorah Freeman; Arianna Kee; Marc Tian; Rina Mehta
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-01-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.