| Literature DB >> 32362021 |
Amr E Abbas1,2, Ramy Mando1, George Hanzel1,2, James Goldstein1,2, Francis Shannon1,2, Philippe Pibarot3.
Abstract
Evaluating the hemodynamic performance of aortic valve prostheses has relied primarily on echocardiography. This involves calculating the trans-prosthetic valve mean gradient (MG) and aortic valve area (AVA), and assessing for valvular and paravalvular regurgitation in a fashion similar to the native aortic valve. In conjunction with other echocardiographic and nonechocardiographic parameters, MG and AVA are used to distinguish between prosthesis stenosis, prosthesis patient mismatch, pressure recovery, increased flow, and measurement errors. This review will discuss the principles and limitations of echocardiographic evaluation of aortic valve prosthesis following surgical, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement and in comparison to invasive hemodynamics through illustrative clinical cases.Entities:
Keywords: Bernoulli equation; continuity equation; echocardiography and catheterization discordance; pressure recovery; prosthesis patient mismatch; transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32362021 DOI: 10.1111/echo.14663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Echocardiography ISSN: 0742-2822 Impact factor: 1.724