Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Vidofludimus calcium (IMU-838) After Single and Multiple Ascending Oral Doses in Healthy Male Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Vidofludimus is a potent and selective inhibitor of human mitochondrial enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH). The clinical efficacy and safety profile of vidofludimus has been analyzed in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. In previous sudies, hematuria at higher doses occurred in close temporal relationship to vidofludimus administration and appeared to be dose related. The present report describes the results from two phase 1 studies conducted in healthy male subjects to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics after single and multiple ascending (SAD and MAD) oral doses of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium, tablets containing a specific polymorph). The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of IMU-838 was also assessed in the SAD study.
METHODS: In the SAD study, 12 subjects received single doses of IMU-838 under fasting (10-40 mg) or fed (10 mg) condition in an open-label, partial parallel group design. In the MAD study, 52 subjects received multiple doses of IMU-838 (30-50 mg) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design.
RESULTS: IMU-838 showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics after single and multiple oral dosing in both SAD and MAD studies. IMU-838 was well absorbed after single daily doses. Food did not impact the pharmacokinetics of IMU-838. The accumulation factor for multiple daily dosing was approximately 2. Steady-state concentrations were reached within about 6-8 days for 30-50 mg groups. The geometric mean plasma half-life of IMU-838 at steady state was approximately 30 h, which supports its use for once-daily dosing regimen. Single and multiple oral doses of IMU-838 were safe and well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: Overall, oral IMU-838 was generally well tolerated in SAD and MAD studies in healthy subjects over a wide dose range of 10-50 mg. IMU-838 was well absorbed after single daily doses. IMU-838 showed dose proportional pharmacokinetics after single and multiple oral dosing.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes

Key Points

Introduction

Vidofludimus, the active moiety and free acid form of IMU-838, is a potent and selective inhibitor of human mitochondrial enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), which is only expressed at high levels and relevant in metabolically activated lymphocytes [1-3]. The activity of DHODH is the rate-limiting step in pyrimidine synthesis to support the enhanced nucleotide demand for messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis in highly activated lymphocytes [4, 5]. The inhibition of DHODH in these cells leads to induction of a metabolic stress signal initiating an immediate block of transcription of pre-loaded genes like certain cytokines. If the metabolic stress signal holds on because of prolonged DHODH inhibition, pro-apoptotic transcripts are stabilized, and apoptosis is induced [3, 6]. Normal-acting lymphocytes without a high metabolic turnover do not depend on de novo pyrimidine synthesis but can satisfy their pyrimidine requirements through the DHODH-independent salvage pathway [3, 7]. Therefore, inhibition of DHODH by vidofludimus selectively affects highly activated lymphocytes like phytohemagglutinin (PHA) stimulated lymphocytes in vitro or highly activated and chronically stimulated lymphocytes in autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Klotz et al. have demonstrated that those lymphocytes with the highest affinity to the antigen and the highest metabolic activity are the most sensitive cells to DHODH inhibition [8]. Furthermore, vidofludimus is a very potent inhibitor of interleukin (IL)-17 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release from stimulated immune cells. The efficacy of vidofludimus has been demonstrated in several animal disease models for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [2] as well as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [1], multiple sclerosis (experimental autoimmune encephalitis, EAE) [9] and transplant rejection [10]. In hepatocytes, a total of eight metabolites are identified across different species, six of the eight metabolites in human hepatocytes. The main metabolite in humans was formed via O-demethylation. A study using human liver microsomes with and without cytochrome P450 (CYP)-selective inhibitors, and using human recombinant enzymes, showed that cytochrome CYP2C8 was the predominant hepatic CYP isoform involved in metabolism of vidofludimus, with smaller contributions by CYP2C9 (data on file).

Vidofludimus in its form as free acid (lab code: SC12267) using capsules or tablets containing amorphous vidofludimus (previous formulation name: 4SC-101) previously underwent a phase 1 and 2 clinical development program. The clinical efficacy and safety profile of vidofludimus (free acid) were analyzed in clinical studies in healthy volunteers [4] and patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis [11, 12] and Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis [4]. Single doses up to 350 mg and multiple doses up to 70 mg for 14 days have been tested in healthy volunteers. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis have been exposed to daily doses of 20 or 35 mg vidofludimus with individual treatment durations of 12–13 weeks [4, 11, 12]. An in-depth analysis of the whole clinical database has demonstrated that vidofludimus free acid at daily doses < 70 mg is not associated with an increased rate of clinically relevant adverse reactions. High doses of vidofludimus administered in the single- and multiple-dose phase 1 studies showed presumably drug-associated events of hematuria. Cases of hematuria occurred exclusively at single doses of 210 mg vidofludimus (free acid) or higher and at daily doses of 70 mg vidofludimus (free acid). These occurred in close temporal relationship to study drug administration and appeared to be dose related. Although there is no strict dose correlation, very high doses of vidofludimus in the phase 1 trials seemed to also result in lowering of serum uric acid levels. Urinary crystallization of uric acid in acidic urine may be speculated to be the event mechanism for these events of hematuria at multiple doses of 70 mg or higher [12]. For this reason, the doses in this trial were selected to not exceed the AUC found in the previous phase 1 trial (SC12267-2-2004) of 70 mg daily repeated SC12267 (AUC0–24,ss of 259.5 h μg/ml), which led to the findings of hematuria (data on file).

Immunic AG has developed a new pharmaceutical form containing the calcium salt of vidofludimus (lab code: IM90838; INNM: vidofludimus calcium) in a new pharmaceutical formulation (tablets containing a specific polymorph) with the designated formulation name of IMU-838. IMU-838 is under development as an oral tablet formulation for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), IBD and other chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. This report describes the results from two phase 1 studies conducted in healthy male subjects to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics after single and multiple ascending (SAD and MAD) oral doses of IMU-838. In the single-dose study, food effect on the pharmacokinetics of IMU-838 was also assessed.

Methods

Ethics Approval

The protocols for SAD and MAD studies were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC). The studies were conducted in compliance with ethical standards for human experimentation established by the Declaration of Helsinki principles, the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) and the Guideline of Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Both SAD and MAD studies were conducted at a single center, Nuvisan GmbH, Germany.

Study Participants

Twelve (in the SAD study) and 52 (in the MAD study) healthy male subjects between 18 and 55 years of age inclusive, body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m2 inclusive and smoking ≤ 5 cigarettes/day were included in the studies. As the monitoring of erythrocytes in urine was a major safety objective in this trial, no female subjects were included because menses is known to cause artificial hematuria. No difference is expected between male and female subjects as no preclinical studies had observed any differences between different genders. The summary of demographic data for SAD and MAD studies is given in Table 1. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before participation in the studies. The complete details of inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Supplementary Appendix 1 (SAD and MAD study). Only the subjects who complied with all selection criteria were enrolled into the trial. IMU-838 tablets were used in the strengths of 10, 15 and 20 mg. In both SAD and MAD studies, blood samples were collected and centrifuged within 45 min of blood draw. A vial (3.0 ml K2 EDTA-Vacutainer) was centrifuged for 10 min at ~ 2000g in a precooled centrifuge (5 °C). After centrifugation, a pipette was used to extract two samples of 0.3 ml plasma (main and backup sample). These plasma samples were stored at − 20 °C up to measurements. The storage condition was validated for up to 3 months.

Table 1

SAD and MAD study demographics

Demographics	SAD study		MAD study
	Group 1(n = 6)	Group 2(n = 6)	Group 1		Group 2		Group 3
			Placebo (n = 4)	30 mg (n = 12)	Placebo (n = 4)	40 mg (n = 12)	Placebo-pre-dosed/Placebo (n = 4)	Placebo- pre-dosed /50 mg (n = 8)	25 mg pre-dosed /50 mg (n = 8)
Age (years)	46.8 ± 10.76 (26–55)	40.8 ± 10.25 (22–50)	37.3 ± 16.52 (22–53)	32.8 ± 11.26 (19–55)	50.3 ± 3.50 (46–54)	37.8 ± 9.63 (26–53)	37.8 ± 10.81 (25–49)	39.0 ± 12.29 (19–53)	38.5 ± 13.13 (22–53)
Height (cm)	176.7 ± 9.48 (163–190)	179.0 ± 12.77 (169–204)	185.8 ± 3.69 (181–190)	177.7 ± 6.61 (164–188)	175.5 ± 3.11 (171–178)	177.7 ± 6.26 (166–184)	175.0 ± 4.16 (170–180)	181.4 ± 9.58 (168–193)	178.4 ± 5.66 (170–189)
Weight (kg)	78.07 ± 8.331 (67.1–88.6)	80.62 ± 17.451 (66.2–115.3)	85.5 ± 12.37 (68.0–96.0)	76.5 ± 8.99 (65.0–94.0)	84.5 ± 3.46 (81.2–89.1)	76.7 ± 9.41 (61.0–92.7)	68.2 ± 10.43 (54.5–78.8)	83.4 ± 11.96 (67.7–101.2)	77.9 ± 8.37 (65.0–88.9)
BMI (kg/m2)	25.05 ± 2.696 (21.9–28.2)	24.90 ± 1.887 (22.5–27.7)	24.8 ± 3.40 (19.7–26.6)	24.3 ± 3.03 (20.1–29.7)	27.5 ± 1.71 (25.9–29.1)	24.4 ± 3.45 (18.6–29.5)	22.2 ± 2.66 (18.9–25.4)	25.3 ± 2.86 (20.7–29.8)	24.5 ± 2.62 (20.7–27.1)

Values are expressed as mean ± SD (range)

BMI body mass index, SD standard deviation, SAD single ascending dose, MAD multiple ascending dose

Study Design

Study 1: SAD Study

Study 1 had an open-label, partial parallel group design, with escalating single oral doses of IMU-838 in 12 healthy male subjects. The primary objective of the study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of IMU-838 while the secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of IMU-838 and to assess the effect of food intake on bioavailability of IMU-838 in healthy male subjects. Healthy male subjects were divided in two groups. In group 1, subjects (n = 6) received two single ascending doses in the fasted state (10 and 30 mg) and a single dose of 10 mg IMU-838 after a standardized breakfast in a third period. In group 2, subjects (n = 6) received two single doses in the fasted state (20 and 40 mg).

Drug administration took place in the morning with appropriate intervals between subjects to allow for sample collection and any necessary additional clinical observations. Blood samples were collected and plasma was analyzed for IMU-838 concentrations at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120 and 168 h after dosing. There was a washout of at least 14 days between administrations in the same subject. Fasted drug administration was performed after an overnight fast of 10 h, which was continued for a further 4 h. Fed administration was performed 30 min after start of a standardized breakfast. Urine samples were collected for 24 h prior to dosing, and a sample of the post-dose 24 h urine collection was used for determination of the amount of drug excreted.

Subjects were hospitalized from day − 1 until discharge on the morning of day 3 (72 h after dosing). After completion of all 48-h assessments of a dosing period, safety and drug concentration data were reviewed, and the next dose increment was decided on by the sponsor and the investigator. There was a time interval of at least 1 week between two consecutive dosing groups (periods) to allow a careful analysis of the safety parameters of the previous dose group. The decision to proceed with the next higher scheduled dose was taken upon mutual agreement between the sponsor and the investigator and required availability of relevant pharmacokinetic and safety data of the previous dose group. One subject withdrew for personal reasons after completion of period 1 assessments. All other subjects completed the study as planned. All subjects were included in the safety and pharmacokinetic set.

Study 2: MAD Study

Study 2 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design with escalating multiple doses of IMU-838 using an adaptive dose-finding design (for dose escalation and de-escalation) in 52 healthy male subjects. The primary objective of the study was to assess the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of IMU-838 while the secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of IMU-838 in healthy male subjects.

Three consecutive groups of healthy male subjects were used; an optional fourth group was not dosed. The first group of 16 subjects (12 subjects on IMU-838 and 4 on placebo) received 30 mg IMU-838 or placebo once daily over 14 consecutive days. Following the 30 mg starting dose (dose group 1), further dose groups had either of two alternative group designs:

Alternative design A: 14-day once daily dosing (12 subjects received IMU-838 and 4 subjects received placebo),

Alternative design B: 14-day once daily dosing (16 subjects received IMU-838 and 4 subjects received placebo). Preceding the 14-day dosing period, an initiation dose period where subjects received one daily dose during 6 days (day –6 to –1) was initiated:

Eight of 16 subjects randomized to IMU-838 received half of the dose planned for days 0 to 13,

Eight of 16 subjects randomized to IMU-838 received placebo doses,

Four subjects randomized to placebo received placebo doses.

After completion of all day 14 assessments of each dose group, safety and drug concentration data were analyzed and a decision was made about whether:

the study was to be discontinued,

the dose was to be escalated and to which new dose level, or

the dose was to be lowered to an intermediary dose.

If no stopping rules were reached, and the safety and pharmacokinetic data were deemed to be acceptable, the next dose group was to be started with a dose that could be up to 1.5-fold higher than the previous dose group. The decision to proceed with the next higher scheduled dose was taken upon mutual agreement between the sponsor and the investigator. There was a time interval of at least 1 week between the end of dosing in one group and start of the next dosing group to allow a careful analysis of the safety and plasma concentrations of IMU-838 of the previous dose group.

After the first dose group (30 mg IMU-838 and placebo), two additional dose groups were performed: one-dose group (40 mg IMU-838 or placebo) with alternative group design A and one-dose group (50 mg IMU-838 or placebo) with alternative group design B.

Drug administration was performed after an overnight fast of at least 8 h, which was continued for further 1 h on the pharmacokinetic profile days. On all other days, dosing was performed in the morning in the fasted state approximately 15 min to 1 h before breakfast. Blood samples were collected and plasma was analyzed for IMU-838 concentrations at different time intervals: pre-dose (within 120 min prior to drug administration) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 h after the first dose on day 0 (13 samples); trough concentrations on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 12 (7 samples); pre-dose (within 15 min prior to drug administration) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h after the last dose on day 13 (16 samples); and a final sample 240 h after the last dosing (day 23). Urine samples were collected for 24 h prior to dosing, and a sample of the post-dose 24 h urine collection was used for determination of the amount of drug excreted. The MAD study design is presented in Table 2. If no stopping rules were reached, and the safety and pharmacokinetic data were deemed acceptable, the next dose group was to be started with a dose that could be up to 1.5-fold higher than the in previous dose group (i.e., the second group may receive between 35 and 45 mg, depending on the data in the starting dose group). The selected dose steps were 40 mg for the second dose group and 50 mg IMU-838 for the third dose group. There was a time interval of at least 1 week between the end of dosing in one group and start of the next dosing group to allow a careful analysis of the safety and plasma concentrations of IMU-838 of the previous dose group. For any dose group without an initiation dose period (alternative A), subjects were hospitalized from day −1 until day 4 (100 h after dosing) and again from day 12 until day 14 (24 h after the last drug administration). For any dose group that included an initiation dose period (alternative B), subjects were additionally hospitalized from day −7 until day −5.

Table 2

MAD study design

Study design: alternative A
	Screening	Treatment phase																Follow-up
		Inpatient						Outpatient							Inpatient			Outpatient
Study day			↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓	↓
	− 21 to − 2	− 1	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	23

↓ dosing, MAD multiple ascending dose

Endpoints and Assessments

Bioanalysis

All samples were stored at − 20 °C until they were analyzed. Plasma and urine IMU-838 concentrations were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography with a tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. The LC-MS/MS system consists of an Applied Biosystems API 4000 mass spectrometer, chromatographic system of an Agilent 1200 series G1312A/B binary pump, Agilent 1200 series G1322/A degasser and Agilent 1200 series G1316A column oven, and an HTC PAL autosampler CTC analytics. The assay method involved a protein precipitation of samples with the internal standard (SC-13093), a chromatographic separation on a Luna C8 (50 × 2.0 mm, 3 μm) column and LC–MS/MS detection. The lower limit of quantitation for the assay was 0.100 µg/ml, and the linear calibration range was 0.100–25.0 µg/ml. The mobile phase used was: mobile phase A [0.7708 g ammonium acetate + 1000 ml high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-water adjust to pH 5 with acetic acid] and mobile phase B (acetonitrile). The purge solution was: purge solution 1 (500 μl formic acid and 500 ml HPLC-water) and purge solution 2 (200 ml HPLC-water, 300 ml acetonitrile and 1.00 ml ammonia solution). The electrospray (atmospheric pressure ionization) technique was used in negative ion (ESI−) mode. The injection volume was 20.0 μl (in the SAD study) and 5.0–10.0 μl (in the MAD study), and the flow rate was 0.300 ml/min.

Pharmacokinetics

For single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated during the interval from 0 h to the last timepoint with a quantifiable concentration (AUC0–t) or during 24 h (AUC0–24) by the linear-log trapezoidal method. The AUC from 0 h to infinity (AUC0–∞) was calculated by adding the last sample with a quantifiable concentration (Cz)/terminal elimination rate constant (λz) to AUC0–t. %AUCextrap was the ratio of the extrapolated part within AUC0–∞ in percentage. The apparent terminal rate constant (λz) was calculated by log linear regression on the terminal phase. The half-life (t1/2) was calculated as (ln 2)/λz. The apparent total clearance (CL/F) was calculated as dose/AUC0–∞ after single dosing and as dose/AUC0–24 after multiple dosing. The apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F) during the terminal phase was calculated as CL/F/λz. The accumulation ratio for AUC (RAAUC) was calculated as AUC0-24(Day 13–14)/AUC0-24(Day 0–1). The accumulation ratio for maximum concentration (RACmax) was calculated as Cmax(Day 13–14)/Cmax(Day 0–1). The amount of IMU-838 excreted in the urine in the given collection interval (Ae) was also calculated.

Safety and Tolerability

Safety and tolerability were assessed in both the studies by the clinical evaluation of adverse events (AEs), vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate), 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter ECG, physical examination and laboratory investigations (urine and plasma).

Population Pharmacokinetic Model

A preliminary structural population pharmacokinetic model was evaluated based on available SAD and MAD data. Concentration data collected after administration in the fed state or collected after pre-dosing were not included. The outliers identified in the MAD study were included. The purpose was to evaluate the feasibility to fit a population pharmacokinetic model on phase 1 data to update it with data from future phase 2 studies.

A two-compartment model with first-order kinetic constants for absorption, inter-compartmental transfer and elimination was fitted on the IMU-838 concentrations after single (only doses in the fasted state) and multiple administration (Fig. 1). After visual inspection of the mean concentration-time profiles in a semi-logarithmic scale (see Figs. 2, 3), it was concluded that a bi-exponential model was appropriate. The population pharmacokinetic model was parametrized in terms of absorption rate (ka), volume (V1/F, volume in the central compartment and V2/F, volume in the peripheral compartment) and clearance (CL/F, the apparent total clearance, and Q/F, the intercompartmental clearance between the central and peripheral compartments). The absorption rate was estimated by fitting the two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model on SAD and MAD data without any derivation. The elimination (k10) and inter-compartmental rate constants (k12, k21) were derived from the clearance and volume as expressed below:

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the two-compartment model. CL/F apparent total clearance, ka absorption rate, Q/F intercompartmental clearance between central and peripheral compartments, V1/F volume in central compartment, V2/F volume in peripheral compartment

Fig. 2

Mean concentration-time profiles of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) up to 24 h post-dose after fasted administration of IMU-838 in SAD study. h hour, SAD single ascending dose

Fig. 3

Mean concentration-time profiles of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) up to 24 h post-dose after fasted and fed administration of 10 mg IMU-838 in the SAD study. h hour, SAD single ascending dose

The alpha t1/2 was the t1/2 on the rapid distribution phase, and the beta t1/2 was the t1/2 on the slow elimination phase. Both alpha and beta t1/2 were derived from the elimination and inter-compartmental rate constants.

In this preliminary stage, only the structural population pharmacokinetic model was estimated, without any covariate testing. Observations below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; < 0.1 μg/ml) were treated as left-censored data. Inter-individual variability (IIV) was estimated on CL/F and V1/F according to the following equation:where is the estimated parameter for subject , is the typical population value of the parameter, and are individual-specific inter-individual random effects for individual and are assumed to be normally distributed, with a variance-covariance matrix for the inter-individual random effects ( Residual error was modeled using an exponential error model:where Y is the observed concentration in the ith individual at the jth time point, individual predicted data (IPRED) is the individual predicted concentration in the ith individual, and is the residual error in the ith individual at the jth time point and is assumed to be normally distributed, with the residual variability.

Statistical Analysis

For SAD and MAD studies, the pharmacokinetic parameters of IMU-838 were assessed for dose proportionality. The respective linear regression model related the logarithm of dose as an independent variable to the logarithm of the pharmacokinetic parameters. To investigate dose proportionality, an estimate for the slope of the regression line with a 95% confidence interval was presented. A value that was appreciably different from 1 provided evidence for non-proportionality. All safety data were evaluated descriptively. The pharmacokinetic statistical analysis was conducted by using the computer software package SAS 9.4. The population pharmacokinetic analysis model was developed using SAS 9.4 (SAS/STAT 15.1) with the PROC NLMIXED procedure in combination with the CMPTMODEL statement.

Results

Pharmacokinetics

The inter-assay accuracy and precision data were calculated from 32 sets of QC samples. One set of QC samples consisted of three concentrations (0.300, 12.5 and 20.0 μg/ml). Each sequence contained two sets of QC samples (the pre-qualifying run six sets). The linearity (mean r2 of the standard curves) was 0.99786. Accuracy (bias %) and precision (range %) were between − 4.6 and − 1.8 and between 6.1 and 13.1, respectively. The precision and accuracy data are comparable to the results of the validation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the sample results are reliable within the given accuracy and precision ranges.

Mean concentration-time (linear and semilogarithmic) profiles of IMU-838 are summarized in Fig. 2 (fasted administration up to 24 h post-dose) and Fig. 3 (fasted-fed administration). All pre-dose concentrations were below the LLOQ (< 0.1 μg/ml). Plasma concentrations rapidly increased dose dependently and reached a peak concentration between 2 and 5 h. The mean concentration-time profiles of IMU-838 were similar after fasted and fed administration with slightly higher and later peak concentration after administration in the fed state compared with the fasted state.

Single oral dosing of IMU-838 in doses ranging from 10 to 40 mg results in predictable, dose-linear plasma pharmacokinetics under fasted conditions. A dose proportional increase in AUC and Cmax was observed for IMU-838 with slopes near 1 and 95% confidence intervals containing the ‘1’ (except for AUC0–t where the 95% confidence intervals were slightly above 1) (Supplementary Appendix 2). Geometric mean t1/2 under fasted conditions ranged from 26.6 to 41.4 h. Geometric mean CL/F under fasted conditions (3.48–4.22 ml/min) and Vz/F (9.36 to 12.48 L) were similar for all doses. For the 30 mg dose (the dose expected to be closest to an effective dose), the terminal plasma t1/2 was approximately 40 h, and median time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was seen at 5 h. Based on single-dose pharmacokinetics, an accumulation ratio regarding exposure following multiple daily dosing close to 2 was expected. Comparing single dosing of 10 mg under fasted and fed conditions, no detrimental effect of food intake and only a small difference between fasted and fed conditions were found consistent with the lipophilic characteristics of the active ingredient. Blood exposure was only slightly higher (about 32%) after fed administration compared with fasted conditions. Geometric mean Cmax was about 23% higher. Overall, median tmax following single oral doses of IMU-838 occurred between 3 and 5 h under fasted conditions and 7 h under fed conditions, consistent with a known delayed stomach emptying following food intake. The principal IMU-838 pharmacokinetic parameters are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3

Summary of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) in the SAD study

Parameters	10 mg fasted (n = 6)	20 mg fasted (n = 6)	30 mg fasted (n = 6)	40 mg fasted (n = 5)	10 mg fed (n = 6)
AUC0-t (μg·h/ml)	35.749 (16.3)	72.973 (17.1)	129.785 (31.4)	180.809 (18.4)	47.441 (30.1)
AUC0-24 (μg·h/ml)	19.663 (22.9)	41.107 (19.4)	64.521 (34)	94.413 (17.4)	24.199 (29.9)
AUC0-∞ (μg·h/ml)	41.010 (15.9)	79.023 (17.2)	137.617 (29.3)	191.565 (21)	53.941 (25.5)
Cmax (μg/ml)	1.527 (33.7)	3.374 (25.6)	4.943 (57.1)	7.856 (21.2)	1.881 (36.3)
tmax (h)	3.17 (2–5)	4.00 (2–8)	5.33 (1–12)	3.40 (3–4)	6.34 (3–8)
CL/F (ml/min)	4.064 (15.9)	4.218 (17.2)	3.633 (29.3)	3.480 (21)	3.090 (25.5)
Vz/F (l)	9.362 (13.5)	10.238 (23.0)	12.398 (27.3)	12.485 (19.6)	9.018 (23.7)
t1/2 (h)	26.613 (21.3)	28.039 (28.8)	39.422 (15.8)	41.444 (13.6)	33.718 (14.3)

Geometric mean (geometric %CV) is reported above; for tmax, median (minimum-maximum) is reported

AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last time point with a detectable plasma concentration, AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to scheduled sample at time 24 h, AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, CL/F apparent total clearance, C maximum plasma concentration, n number of subjects, CV coefficient of variation, t time to maximum plasma concentration, t half-life, V/F apparent volume of distribution, SAD single ascending dose

The amount of IMU-838 excreted in urine was very low; concentrations were below the LLOQ in all samples obtained after 10 mg IMU-838 and in four of six samples after 20 mg IMU-838. Following 30 mg IMU-838 and 40 mg IMU-838, drug urine concentrations were found to be above the LLOQ for four of six and four of the five subjects, respectively, and the amount of IMU-838 excreted in urine from 4 to 28 h post-dose ranged between 0.22 and 0.46 mg after 30 mg IMU-838 and between 0.42 and 0.52 mg after 40 mg IMU-838. This amounts to slightly more than 1% of the administered dose excreted in urine during this single 24 h time period.

The inter-assay accuracy and precision data were calculated from 64 sets of QC samples. One set of QC samples consisted of three concentrations (0.300, 12.5 and 20.0 μg/ml). Each sequence contained two sets of QC samples (the pre-qualifying run six sets). The linearity (mean r2 of the standard curves) was 0.99776. Accuracy (bias %) and precision (range %) in the MAD study were between − 5.6 and − 4.0 and between 7.2 and 7.9, respectively. The precision and accuracy data are comparable to the results of the validation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the sample results are reliable within the given accuracy and precision ranges.

Repeated oral dosing of IMU-838 in doses ranging from 30 to 50 mg resulted in dose-proportional plasma pharmacokinetics under fasted conditions (Figs. 4, 5).

Fig. 4

Mean concentration time profiles of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) up to 24 h after dosing on day 0 and up to 72 h after dosing on day 13 in MAD study. h hour, MAD multiple ascending dose

Fig. 5

Mean trough plasma concentration time profiles of the IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) in MAD study. MAD multiple ascending dose

On day 0, mean concentration-time profiles of IMU-838 were lowest after administration of 30 mg, similar after 40 mg and 50 mg (not pre-dosed) and highest after 50 mg pre-dosed with peak concentrations at 3–4 h after dosing. Geometric mean AUC0–t of IMU-838 increased from 51.1 μg·h/ml after 30 mg to 71.7 μg·h/ml after 40 mg and showed no further increase after administration of 50 mg (not pre-dosed: 66.7 μg·h/ml). Similar results were seen for AUC0–24 h. Geometric mean Cmax of IMU-838 increased from 3.98 μg/ml after 30 mg IMU-838 to 5.81 μg/ml after 40 mg IMU-838; no further increase was observed after 50 mg (not pre-dosed: 5.02 μg/ml). Median tmax occurred between 2 and 3 h. The t1/2, CL/F and Vz/F could not be calculated after the single dose because of a too short observation period before the second dosing.

Steady-state concentrations were reached within about 6–8 days for the pre-dosed group as well as for the 30–50 mg groups (Fig. 5). The median tmax following multiple oral doses of IMU-838 occurred between 2 to 3 h after the first and after repeated dosing (Table 4). Geometric mean t1/2 at steady state ranged from 28.6 to 30.4 h. After 14 days of dosing, geometric mean AUC0–t of IMU-838 was 189 h·μg/ml after 30 mg, 285 h·μg/ml after 40 mg and similar after 50 mg IMU-838 (304 and 310 h·μg/ml), independent of whether pre-dosed with half-dose IMU-838 or placebo. Similar differences between the treatments were seen for AUC0–24 h. Geometric mean Cmax of IMU-838 was 6.54 μg/ml after 30 mg IMU-838 and similar after 40 mg and 50 mg (10.9, 10.7 and 10.8 μg/ml after 40 mg, 50 mg pre-dosed and 50 mg not pre-dosed, respectively). A dose-proportional increase in AUC and Cmax was observed for IMU-838 with slopes near 1 and 95% confidence intervals containing the ‘1’ (Supplementary Appendix 3). The accumulation factor after repeated dosing ranged between 1.96 to 2.49 for AUC0–t and 1.64 to 2.16 for Cmax.

Table 4

Summary of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) in MAD study

Parameters	30 mg (n = 12)	40 mg (n = 12)	50 mg pre-dosed (n = 8)	50 mg not pre-dosed (n = 8)	50 mg all (n = 16)
Day 0
AUC0–24 (μg•h/ml)	51.211 (29.0)	78.315a (25.6)	107.440b (28.0)	67.143 (36.7)	82.130c (41.0)
Cmax (μg/ml)	3.979 (39.5)	5.805 (32.3)	7.264 (27.7)	5.016 (51.1)	6.036 (44.3)
tmax (h)	3.00 (2.0–8.0)	3.00 (2.0–5.0)	2.00 (2.0–4.0)	3.00 (2.0–4.0)	2.00 (2.0–4.0)
Day 13
AUC0–t (μg·h/ml)	188.554 (30.3)	284.959 (25.3)	304.154 (16.1)	310.301 (32.7)	307.212 (24.8)
AUC0–24 (μg·h/ml)	100.294 (25.0)	158.686 (22.6)	165.552 (14.1)	167.254 (27.3)	166.401 (20.9)
Cmax (μg/ml)	6.543 (25.8)	10.911 (20.2)	10.725 (20.1)	10.841 (21.5)	10.783 (20.1)
tmax (h)	3.00 (3.0–12.0)	3.00 (1.0–5.0)	3.00 (2.0–5.0)	2.00 (2.0–5.0)	2.50 (2.0–5.0)
CL/F (ml/min)	4.985 (25.0)	4.201 (22.6)	5.034 (14.1)	4.982 (27.3)	5.008 (20.9)
Vz/F (l)	13.125 (25.1)	10.235d (17.0)	13.040 (19.4)	12.802 (23.5)	12.920 (20.8)
RAAUC	1.958 (24.4)	2.077e (23.1)	1.584f (30.6)	2.491 (28.1)	2.052 g (37.1)
RACmax	1.644 (37.6)	1.880 (30.1)	1.476 (38.7)	2.161 (48.8)	1.786 (47.5)
t1/2 (h)	30.414 (20.5)	28.566d (14.6)	29.928 (14.5)	29.682 (19.5)	29.805 (16.6)

AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last time point with a detectable plasma concentration, AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the scheduled sample at time 24 h, AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, CL/F apparent total clearance, C maximum plasma concentration, n number of subjects, CV coefficient of variation, RAAUC accumulation ratio for AUC0–24, RA accumulation ratio for Cmax, t time to maximum plasma concentration, t half-life, V/F apparent volume of distribution, MAD multiple ascending dose

Geometric mean (geometric %CV) is reported above; For tmax, median (minimum–maximum) is reported; an = 9, bn = 6, cn = 14, dn = 11, en = 9, fn = 6, gn = 14; not calculated: not reliable because of high %AUCextrap

Safety

Single oral doses of IMU-838 were well tolerated. A total of nine treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported with the highest incidence of them found following the lowest single dose (10 mg IMU-838 fasted). No dose dependency was found regarding TEAEs. All TEAEs were of mild intensity and resolved within hours without treatment. Only three TEAEs (flatulence, micturition urgency and headache) experienced by three subjects were considered drug-related by the investigator (Table 5). Vital signs, ECG, physical examination and laboratory parameters did not reveal any clinically significant post-dose changes or differences between treatments. Particular emphasis was given to AEs of special interest that included hematuria and retroperitoneal colicky pain in connection with suspected or confirmed nephrolithiasis. Despite the close monitoring of these areas, no clinically significant laboratory findings of special interest and no AEs of special interest were observed.

Table 5

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the SAD study

System organ class	Preferred term	Treatment
		10 mg fasted, n = 6	20 mg fasted, n = 6	30 mg fasted, n = 6	40 mg fasted, n = 5	10 mg fed, n = 6
		N (%) [number of events]
Total		3 (50.0) [5]	1 (16.7) [1]	1 (16.7) [1]	1 (20.0) [1]	1 (16.7) [1]
Infections and infestations	Viral upper respiratory tract infection	2 (33.3) [2]	–	–	–	–
	Rhinitis	–	–	–	1 (20.0) [1]	–
Nervous system disorders	Headache	1 (16.7) [1]	1 (16.7) [1]	–	–	–
Gastrointestinal disorders	Flatulence	1 (16.7) [1]	–	–	–	–
Investigations	Opiates positive	–	–	1 (16.7) [1]	–	–
Renal and urinary disorders	Micturition urgency	1 (16.7) [1]	–	–	–	–
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders	Epistaxis	–	–	–	–	1 (16.7) [1]

Bold: TEAEs considered drug-related, N number of subjects having the event, SAD single ascending dose

Repeated daily oral doses of 30–50 mg IMU-838 administered once daily over 14 consecutive days were well tolerated. Overall, 79 TEAEs of mild or moderate intensity were reported by 31 subjects (59.6%); overall, 53 TEAEs, reported by 29 subjects (55.8%), were considered drug related. There was no increase in the number of subjects who reported drug-related TEAEs or in the number of drug-related TEAEs with increasing dose. The rate of TEAEs was highest after dosing of 30 mg IMU-838 [9 subjects (75.0%) reported 18 drug-related TEAEs] and lower after dosing of 40 mg IMU-838 (5 subjects [41.7%] reported 8 drug-related TEAEs) and after 50 mg IMU-838 (8 subjects [50.0%] reported 16 drug-related TEAEs).

The most frequently reported drug-related TEAEs were flatulence, mainly observed after 30 mg IMU-838, and hemoglobinuria (based solely on positive urine dipstick findings; only 1 of 9 positive findings of hemoglobinuria as measured by urine dipstick could be substantiated by urine sediment analysis) mainly observed after 50 mg IMU-838. Other TEAEs considered drug related by the investigator and that were reported by more than a single subject per treatment were fatigue and headache (Table 6).

Table 6

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the MAD study

System organ class	Preferred term	Treatment
		25 mg, n = 8b	30 mg, n = 12	40 mg, n = 12	50 mg, n = 16b	Placebo, n = 20b
		N (%) [number of events]
Total		3 (37.5) [4]	9 (75.0) [20]	6 (50.0) [12]	10 (62.5) [22]	9 (45.0) [21]
Gastrointestinal disorders	Total	1 (12.5) [2]	7 (58.3) [14]	1 (8.3) [1]	2 (12.5) [3]	3 (15.0) [5]
	Abdominal pain	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–	–
	Abdominal pain upper	1 (12.5) [1]	–	–	1 (6.3) [2]	–
	Diarrhea	1 (12.5) [1]	–	–	–	1 (5.0) [1]
	Dyspepsia	–	–	–	1 (6.3) [1]	1 (5.0) [1]
	Feces soft	–	2 (16.7) [2]	–	–	1 (5.0) [1]
	Flatulence	–	6 (50.0) [10a]	1 (8.3) [1]	–	1 (5.0) [2]
	Nausea	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–	–
Renal and urinary disorders	Total	–	1 (8.3) [1]	2 (16.7) [2]	6 (37.5) [8]	2 (10.0) [3]
	Dysuria	–	–	–	1 (6.3) [1]	–
	Glycosuria	–	–	–	–	1 (5.0) [2]
	Hematuria	–	–	–	1 (6.3) [1]	–
	Hemoglobinuriac	–	1 (8.3) [1]	2 (16.7) [2]	5 (31.3) [6a]	1 (5.0) [1]
Infections and infestations	Total	1 (12.5) [1]	–	–	4 (25.0) [4]	5 (25.0) [6]
	Nasopharyngitis	1 (12.5) [1]	–	–	4 (25.0) [4]	5 (25.0) [5]
	Rhinitis	–	–	–	–	1 (5.0) [1]
General disorders and administration site conditions	Total	–	–	3 (25.0) [3]	1 (6.3) [1]	1 (5.0) [1]
	Fatigue	–	–	3 (25.0) [3a]	–	1 (5.0) [1]
	Tenderness	–	–	–	1 (6.3) [1]	–
Nervous system disorders	Total	–	1 (8.3) [1]	1 (8.3) [2]	3 (18.8) [3]	1 (5.0) [1]
	Headache	–	1 (8.3) [1]	1 (8.3) [2]	3 (18.8) [3]	1 (5.0) [1]
Investigations	Total	–	2 (16.7) [3]	1 (8.3) [1]	1 (6.3) [1]	1 (5.0) [1]
	Blood creatinine kinase increased	–	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–
	Blood glucose increased	–	–	–	–	1 (5.0) [1]
	Gamma–glutamyl transferase increased	–	1 (8.3) [2]	–	–	–
	Lipase increased	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	1 (6.3) [1]	–
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders	Total	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	1 (6.3) [1]	3 (15.0) [4]
	Back pain	–	–	–	–	1 (5.0) [1]
	Flank pain	–	–	–	1 (6.3) [1]	1 (5.0) [1]
	Musculoskeletal discomfort	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–	–
	Pain in extremities	–	–	–	–	2 (10.0) [2]
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders	Total	–	–	1 (8.3) [1]	1 (6.3) [1]	–
	Epistaxis	–	–	–	1 (6.3) [1]	–
	Sneezing	–	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–
Cardiac disorders	Total	1 (12.5) [1]	–	–	–	–
	Atrioventricular block first degree	1 (12.5) [1]	–	–	–	–
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications	total	–	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–
	Arthropod bite	–	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–
Psychiatric disorders	Total	–	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–
	Listless	–	–	1 (8.3) [1]	–	–

Bold: TEAEs considered drug-related, N number of subjects having the event, MAD multiple ascending dose

aDrug-related except for 1 event

bMultiple counting of the same subject in different treatment periods possible (dose group 3; 25 mg, 50 mg and placebo)

cAll occurrences of this AE were based solely on a positive dip stick test. The protocol had specified that evaluation of RBC in urine should be based solely on findings from microscopic examination of urinary sediment and not from dipstick reading alone. However, none of these positive dipstick readings were confirmed by a microscopic examination of urinary sediment. The investigator had decided to report these positive dipstick readings (without confirmation by urine sediment) as adverse events to provide a conservative reporting of events, even though this reporting was not protocol compliant

The majority of individual laboratory values were within the normal ranges. There were no clinically relevant differences between pre- and post-dose assessments and between the treatment groups for any parameter. Most deviations from the normal ranges in any laboratory parameter were small and considered not clinically relevant. Deviations in laboratory values considered possibly clinically relevant were recorded in five subjects (increase in gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT], creatine kinase, blood glucose, lipase, and urine erythrocytes). Laboratory tests to check liver function parameters (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], GGT, total bilirubin and direct/indirect bilirubin) resulted in a single clinically relevant abnormality in one subject only. Pre-treatment with a half-dose of IMU-838 was associated with a smaller increase of uric acid excreted in urine and to a smaller decrease in plasma oxalate upon the start of the 14-day treatment period compared with pre-dosing with placebo.

Physical examination, ECG and vital signs data showed no clinically significant findings except for ‘suprapubic tenderness’ and ‘flank tenderness’ in one subject (50 mg IMU-838; without pre-dosing) and an ‘atrioventricular block first degree’ on day –5 in one subject (25 mg IMU-838 initiation dosing); no further abnormal ECG findings were observed for this subject, even when the dose was increased to 50 mg for 14-day treatment between day 0 and day 13. One single event of moderate hematuria was observed at the end of the dosing period with 50 mg IMU-838, which was considered drug related, although this event was seen in a subject with clinical suspicion of urinary tract infection, which may be an alternative cause of this event. This event occurred in a subject that had been pre-dosed with placebo.

Pharmacokinetic parameters estimates with their relative standard error (%RSE) are presented in Table 7. To check the goodness of fit, the predictive interval is presented in Fig. 6 (SAD study) and Fig. 7 (MAD study) with the observed concentration-time profiles. Based on the predictive intervals, the two-compartment pharmacokinetic model appears to appropriately describe the observed plasma concentration-time profiles.

Table 7

Population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for the IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) base model

Parameter	Units	Estimate	%RSE
CL/F	ml/min	4.47	3.01
Q/F	ml/min	6.15	8.42
V1/F	l	2.98	17.3
V2/F	l	6.31	4.90
ka	h−1	0.15	15.6
k10	h−1	0.0901	17.1
k12	h−1	0.124	14.3
k21	h−1	0.0584	10.6
t1/2 alpha	h	2.76	11.5
t1/2 beta	h	33.1	3.92
IIV on CL/F	%CV	20.8	11.0
IIV on V1/F	%CV	49.4	13.3
Correlation coefficient IIV CL/F and IIV V1/F	–	0.387	36.6
Exponential residual error	%CV	41.6	2.04

CL/F apparent total clearance, CV coefficient of variation, IIV inter-individual variability, k elimination rate constants, k and k inter-compartmental rate constants, ka absorption rate, Q/F intercompartmental clearance between central and peripheral compartments, V/F volume in central compartment, V/F volume in peripheral compartment

k10 was derived from the clearance and volume as per Eq. 1, k12 and k21 were derived from the clearance and volume as per Eqs. 2 and 3, respectively; IIV was estimated on CL/F and V1/F as per Eq. 4; residual error was modeled using an exponential error model as per Eq. 5

Fig. 6

Concentration-time profiles of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) in the SAD study with the predictive interval of the population pharmacokinetic model (median, quantile 2.5% and quantile 97.5%). SAD single ascending dose

Fig. 7

Concentration-time profiles of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) in the MAD study with the predictive interval of the population pharmacokinetic model (median, quantile 2.5% and quantile 97.5%). MAD multiple ascending dose

Discussion

This phase 1, SAD and MAD clinical study characterized the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of IMU-838, an investigational oral selective immunomodulatory drug, in healthy male subjects. IMU-838 is a novel orally available drug that inhibits the intracellular metabolism of activated immune cells by blocking the enzyme DHODH. IMU-838 acts on activated T and B cells without affecting other immune cells, which allows the immune system to keep functioning.

The aim of the SAD and MAD study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of IMU-838 (in particular plasma concentrations). A partial parallel design with a small number of healthy male subjects aged 18–55 years was considered appropriate for the clinical studies given the safety database of 299 subjects previously exposed to vidofludimus (free acid) and 12 subjects to IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium in the SAD study) and given the fact that only doses were used that were well below the doses at which the first AEs of special interest (red blood cells [RBCs] in urine or hematuria) were expected. In the previous phase 1 SAD trial of vidofludimus (free acid), the lowest single dose at which hematuria was present was 210 mg. As the monitoring of erythrocytes in urine was a major safety objective in this trial, no female subjects were included as it is known that menses can serve as an alternative cause for hematuria. It was also important to evaluate the blood exposure of IMU-838 comparing fasted and fed conditions for future trials that will use multiple doses (the expected form of therapy for IMU-838). The inclusion of a fed/fasted arm was considered important for the treatment regimen in a consecutively planned multiple-dose study. The partial parallel group design would allow intra-individual comparison of fasted and fed conditions in the one-dose group (10 mg).

IMU-838 was readily absorbed following administration of single oral doses under fasted condition. Single oral doses of 10–40 mg of IMU-838 under fasted conditions were associated with a dose-proportional increase in AUC and Cmax with slopes near 1 and 95% confidence intervals containing the ‘1’ (except for AUC0-t, where the 95% confidence intervals were slightly > 1). The geometric mean t1/2 ranged from about 27 to 41 h, and the median tmax occurred between 3 and 5 h. Geometric mean CL/F and Vz/F were similar for all doses. Food intake was not associated with any detrimental effect on IMU-838 exposure, which was found consistent with the lipophilic characteristics of the active ingredient. IMU-838 tmax was prolonged when given with food, consistent with a known delayed stomach emptying following food intake.

Multiple daily oral dosing of IMU-838 resulted in a dose linear plasma pharmacokinetics under fasted conditions up to doses of 50 mg IMU-838. Geometric mean t1/2 at steady state ranged from 28.6 to 30.4 h; median tmax occurred between 2 to 3 h. These pharmacokinetic properties make IMU-838 well suited for once-daily dosing and limit the accumulation after repeat dosing (the accumulation factor ranged between 1.96 and 2.49 for AUC0–t and between 1.64 and 2.16 for Cmax). Steady-state concentrations were reached within about 6–8 days. The time needed to reach 97% of the steady state is at least 5 half-lives, meaning that at least 150 h (or 6.25 days) are needed to reach steady state. For the pre-dosed group, samples at − 2 h and − 1 h had not been planned; however, the mean concentration at time 0 h was about 50% of the concentration for the 50 mg group at 6 h after repeated dosing on day 6. Thus, linear pharmacokinetics can be assumed. The mean apparent terminal t1/2 calculated on day 13 was about 30 h. The time needed to reach 97% of the steady state is at least five half-lives, meaning that at least 150 h (or 6.25 days) is needed to reach steady state.

Oral IMU-838 administered in single and multiple doses was well tolerated. There were no deaths or serious AEs reported in the study. All TEAEs were of mild or moderate intensity. There was no discontinuation in either the SAD and MAD study due to TEAEs. One subject in the SAD study prematurely discontinued the study for personal reasons. With the single doses, there were a total of nine TEAEs with the highest incidence found following the lowest single dose (10 mg IMU-838 fasted). With multiple doses, there were a total of 53 drug-related TEAEs with the highest incidence found following the lowest multiple dose (30 mg IMU-838). No dose dependency was found regarding TEAEs. Vital signs, physical examination and ECG parameters did not reveal any clinically significant post-dose changes or differences between treatments. The incidences of TEAEs for the 50 mg dose group were similar between 25 mg IMU-838 pre-treatment (6 days pre-treatment) and placebo pre-treatment. A smaller increase of uric acid excreted in urine and a smaller decrease in plasma oxalate upon the start of the 14-day treatment period were observed compared to pre-dosing with placebo. Thus, pre-dosing with a half-dose may be an effective strategy to further limit the risk of AEs of elevated RBC levels in urine or hematuria. Particular emphasis in this trial was given to AEs of special interest that included hematuria and retroperitoneal colicky pain in connection with suspected or confirmed nephrolithiasis. Moderate hematuria was observed at the end of the dosing period in a subject with 50 mg IMU-838. This event was considered drug-related, although this event was seen in a subject with clinical suspicion of urinary tract infection, which was considered to be an alternative cause of this event.

A preliminary structural population pharmacokinetic model has been developed based on single- and multiple-dose concentration data collected after administration in the fasted state and without pre-dosing. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order kinetic constants appears to appropriately describe the observed plasma concentration-time profiles.

The present studies have several limitations: (1) first, the study is limited to Caucasian participants; (2) second, no women were studied because of the focus on monitoring hematuria; (3) third, as the main elimination pathway of IMU-838 seems to be biliary, the pharmacokinetics and elimination in patients with hepatic impairment remain to be explored.

Conclusions

Overall, oral IMU-838 was generally well tolerated in SAD and MAD studies in healthy subjects over a wide dose range of 10–50 mg. IMU-838 was well absorbed after single daily doses. IMU-838 showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics after single and multiple oral dosing. Food did not impact the pharmacokinetics of IMU-838. Geometric mean plasma t1/2 of IMU-838 at steady state was approximately 30 h, which supports its use for a once-daily dosing regimen that is currently being evaluated in phase 2 studies. A preliminary population pharmacokinetic model has been developed to support the further analysis of sparse pharmacokinetic data planned to be collected in the future phase 2 studies.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 kb)

This article reports the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics after single and multiple ascending (SAD and MAD) oral doses of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) from two phase 1 studies conducted in healthy male subjects

This is significant because oral IMU-838 offers favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics and is well tolerated in SAD and MAD studies in healthy subjects over a wide dose range of 10–50 mg

IMU-838 showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics after single and multiple oral dosing

A preliminary population pharmacokinetic model has been developed to support the further analysis of sparse pharmacokinetic data planned to be collected in the future phase 2 studies